...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in McLeansboro

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a traumatic event like a dog bite injury in McLeansboro, you seek reassurance and protection. Carlson Bier embodies that safe haven, bringing their wealth of experience in handling dog bite cases in Illinois to navigate swiftly through complex legal proceedings, making them your dependable companion during these tough times. Their expertise lies not only in comprehending the nuances of your situation but also in crafting compelling arguments for maximum compensation. With an unwavering emphasis on client satisfaction and justice delivery, they remain committed till the rightful resolution is achieved. After all, ensuring your peace of mind following an ordeal with Dog Bite Injuries is their highest priority. Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing deftness coupled with compassion; assuring no stone will be left unturned to protect your rights and interests over everything else; indeed reinforcing why they are considered trusted allies when it comes to seeking representation for dog bite injuries litigation cases within Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in McLeansboro Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the gravity of a dog bite incident and its potential impact on your quality of life. As a renowned personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our primary focus is assisting victims of unfortunate dog bite injuries navigate through seeking justice and compensation. The scope of these incidents goes beyond physical wounds; they can also culminate in emotional distress and sometimes debilitating trauma.

Dog bites present various complexities, from the legal to the health related aspects. For starters, correctly identifying the dog’s breed or type that inflicted harm can be instrumental in understanding particular behavior patterns, inherent risk levels and other pertinent factors that could influence the case outcome. Additionally, knowledge about animal laws – particularly those concerning ‘dangerous dogs’ or ‘negligence per se concepts’ – holds vital importance when dealing with dog bite cases. Such nuanced facets call for an acute understanding of both law and behavioral disciplines.

• There exists common misconceptions about assailant dogs being “naturally aggressive breeds”; however, any breed has potential to cause significant harm.

• Since you are entitled to seek damages not just for physical but also emotional suffering resulting from a traumatic incident like a dog attack, consider counseling even if no visible injuries exist as such trauma often lingers below skin level.

A critical aspect to remember post sustaining such an injury is prompt medical attention; it reduces infection risk while ensuring documentations are made – crucial in future claims process. While everyone hopes never to fall victim to a situation so fraught with distressing complications, taking steps towards understanding how exactly to handle one provides insight into possible outcomes should something unforeseeable occur.

Illinois Dog Owner Liability Law constitutes another facet one must comprehend when dealing with instances like these. Essentially stating that owners alone bear responsibility for attack occurrences barring rare exceptions (like provocation by victim), this remains largely beneficial from victims’ perspective during damage recovery procedures

• The liable party’s homeowners insurance usually ends up compensating victim in most cases.

• In cases where no insurance is available to cover costs, seeking legal judgment against the dog owner becomes an option.

Representation by an empathetic legal professional often proves more comforting throughout the process. At Carlson Bier, our experienced and knowledgeable attorneys aid clients in navigating each step with ease – from initial consultation through conclusion of proceedings.

Accident-related personal injury law can be highly complicated sphere for those not well-versed with its technical facets. Provided this complexity, working closely with a firm that not only brings solid professional expertise but also embodies empathy towards victims’ distressing situation helps considerably. The entire team at Carlson Bier enhances rehabilitation chances by handling these bewildering tasks so you can focus on your recovery journey.

Remember, time constraints exist within which one needs to move forward legally after a dog bite incident – called Statute Of Limitations. Therefore, hesitating means reducing chances of securing compensation entitled under Illinois law.

Our dedicated team strives tirelessly drawing upon our decades-long experience to ensure maximum benefit transpires for you along stringent legal paths thereby making your life easier during such challenging times.

We invite you to take profound confidence knowing that Carlson Bier’s zealous representation stands between you and potential chaos while treading murky corridors of personal injury litigation related to dog bite injuries. Click on the button below to discover what value we bring to your case and how much it could potentially be worth. Your path towards justice starts now – choose Carlson Bier for apt guidance amidst uncertainty’s maze! We stand ready restoring peace back into lives terribly jostled by mind-numbing dog bite incidents!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For McLeansboro Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in McLeansboro

Areas of Practice in McLeansboro

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Supplying professional legal support for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering experienced legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Stumble Accidents

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents receive fair compensation for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Big Rig Mishap

Ensuring professional legal representation for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in delivering expert legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on defending persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer