FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in McLeansboro

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been injured in a pedestrian accident, Carlson Bier, based in Illinois, is committed to providing outstanding legal representation. Navigating the aftermath of such an incident can be overwhelming, but with Carlson Bier at your side, you have access to skilled lawyers who specialize in these matters. With extensive knowledge and expertise gained from handling numerous pedestrian accident cases throughout our practice history; we are well-versed in understanding complex traffic laws that come into play during litigation procedures for this type of injury case. While focused on achieving the fairest possible outcome for our clients residing or working around McLeansboro area affected by such mishap, we aim to expedite compensation processes as swiftly as possible while upholding all ethical requirements stipulated under Illinois law. Dare we say there’s no match for their compassionate advocacy and bespoke strategies? Trust Carlson Bier – integrity matched best with diligence when it comes to optimizing justice after sustaining injuries from pedestrian accidents – they truly understand what’s at stake!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in McLeansboro Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we champion the rights of personal injury victims across the state of Illinois. Our primary goal is to advocate for those who have been implicated in pedestrian accidents due to others’ negligent behavior, operating by a commitment to high-level representation that offers peace of mind in these trying times.

Navigating the aftermath of a pedestrian accident can be overwhelming on many fronts with legal complexities often amplifying your anguish and pain. Pedestrian accidents are unfortunately not uncommon and understanding them within a legal framework can go a long way towards ensuring you get access to insurable justice when such unfortunate events occur.

At its simplest, pedestrian accidents occur when someone walking or running is hit by a motor vehicle resulting in injury. Such encounters can provoke extensive damages and even fatalities due to pedestrians’ vulnerability compared to drivers encased within their vehicles protected by robust safety features like airbags and seat belts.

There are various types of injuries associated with pedestrian accidents including:

– Traumatic brain injuries

– Spinal cord injuries

– Broken or fractured bones

– Death

Even seemingly minor incidents can lead to significant physical, emotional, and financial burdens. People may face concussion symptoms or disruptive changes arising from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). If you’ve experienced a similar incident as a pedestrian, you must understand what settlement options await should you take appropriate legal action.

Illinois law espouses several requirements for obtaining compensation after an accidental encounter involving pedestrians. Demonstrating negligence remains critical; this could involve proving that the driver violated traffic laws, such as failing to yield right-of-way or speeding at the time of the accident. Furthermore, showing direct causation between harm suffered and another’s negligence is essential. Importantly remember that while interaction with law enforcement following an accident might feel unnerving don’t ever admit fault before contacting your attorney first.

This leads us onto insurance matters: bear in mind initial compensation will most likely come from ‘at-fault’ vehicle’s auto insurance, potentially followed by your insurers’. Additionally, even when found somewhat at fault, you’re possibly still eligible for compensation on account of Illinois’s ‘Comparative Negligence’ laws invite victims whose actions contributed less than 50% towards accident causation to receive a percentage deductible damages from the guilty party.

Enlisting seasoned legal assistance like that offered by Carlson Bier can be instrumental here. Our experienced team leverages strategic expertise combined with in-depth knowledge enabling us to challenge anything hindering optimal results whether it be proving negligence or negotiating with insurance companies.

At Carlson Bier, we embrace an approachable attitude balancing assertive advocacy with empathetic consideration of your situation. We understand the chaos and distress such experiences impart – our practice entails easing this burden via comprehensive guidance during these overwhelming times plus fighting to secure deserved recompense amplifying recovery chances hence making a significant difference in clients’ lives.

This comprehensive guide is aimed not only at educating you regarding pedestrian accidents but also offering resourceful solutions through reliable representation. At Carlson Bier, we are committed to providing aid informed by years worth of experience within personal injury law assisting countless individuals navigate their respective paths to justice after being implicated as innocent pedestrian victims.

We cordially invite you now to take the next step and find out what your case could be worth thus giving yourself a chance at ensuring necessary justice served by calibrating rightful compensation attainable based on unique circumstances surrounding each incident. Click the button below and journey into a world where your rights get upheld robustly because here at Carlson Bier – personal injury justice isn’t merely our profession; it’s our passion.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For McLeansboro Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in McLeansboro

Areas of Practice in McLeansboro

Cycling Crashes

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Giving specialist legal services for people of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, extending professional legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Birth Damages

Delivering legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Collisions: Committed to helping victims of car accidents receive reasonable recompense for injuries and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Semi Mishap

Extending professional legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Committed to providing dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and expert legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​