Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mendon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a spinal cord injury can truly be life-altering, impacting not only physical wellbeing but also emotional and financial stability. In such trying times, you need the solid strength of an experienced legal ally who is truly committed to your cause. Enter Carlson Bier – esteemed experts in handling Spinal Cord Injury cases throughout Illinois. We endeavor to understand every minute intricacy of your case and strive relentlessly to bring about a resolution that serves you best. Our attorneys are proficient in deciphering complex medical reports, ensuring they advocate proficiently for clients with spinal cord injuries. The distinctive blend of their vast experience, innovative strategies and ceaseless devotion sets them apart as preferred counsel for numerous spinal cord injury victims across Mendon and beyond. Trust us at Carlson Bier when we pledge our dedication towards bringing those responsible to justice while alleviating some burdens from this challenging time through rightful compensation claims advocacy; because nothing speaks louder than actions driven by genuine compassion coupled with sterling competency.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mendon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating consequences of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) and commit to delivering competent legal representation. Schema alanined in Illinois at Carlson Bier is a cadre of experienced personal injury attorneys who harbor an uncompromising commitment to justice for SCI victims.

Spinal cord injuries often result from accidents or violent incidents that could have been avoided if not for someone else’s negligence or recklessness. SCIs can lead to lasting damage such as paralysis, nerve damage, chronic pain, and even death. These life-altering conditions mandate a tremendous financial toll on their victim – costs that include medical expenses, rehabilitation therapies, home modifications and assistance tools among others.

The following aspects underscore the severity of living with spinal cord injuries:

• Chronic Pain: SCI patients often wrestle with debilitating pain which significantly hampers their quality of life.

• Lost Employment Opportunities: The physical aftermath often forces victims out of work thereby truncating opportunities for wage earning whilst escalating medical expenditure.

• High Treatment Costs: The astronomical costs attached to ongoing healthcare numb families financially.

If you consider filing a claim against those responsible for your SCI, understanding the legality concerning your case is pivotal. Personal injury law provision in Illinois represents victims’ interests by holding those accountable whose negligence led to these catastrophic wounds. These cases call for legally proving the fault before securing compensation; this process belies its complexity by technicalities requiring specialized know-how only seasoned attorneys like ours possess.

Filing suit representations incorporate – but are not limited to – proof substantiating negligent behavior triggering the accident; confirmation that plaintiff’s injuries materialized from said event; establishing damages born as consequence thereof; among other pertinent details procuring maximal compensation entitlement under Illinois law . As noted earlier, SCIs impose detrimental effects on multiple facets of a victim’s life thus necessitating fair reparation rights based upon comprehensive evaluation.

Herein lies Carlson Bier’s value proposition where our understanding attorneys commit to guiding you through each stage of your case. Our team dives deep into compiling an infallible evidence portfolio, procuring expert testimonies, and methodically building a convincing argument that reflects the actual hardship endured by SCI victims. We believe in conscientious preparation and aggressive representation for delivering justice in all its might.

Wielding unparalleled prowess within personal injury law circle, Carlson Bier is your port of call when seeking just reparation for Spinal Cord Injuries suffered due to someone else’s negligence or carelessness. We are poised with acute knowledge about intricate insurance policies together with maneuvering litigation maze marvelously thereby liberating our clients from unwelcome stress whilst navigating the claims process.

If inclined towards collaborating with us on your quest for obtaining deserved compensation learn more by pressing on the button below. Unveil what monitory value attaches itself against realization against damages borne at no obligation whatsoever; we only charge fee upon securing victory hence allowing you space to focus upon health recuperation rather than fretting over financial worries. Trust us to walk this journey alongside you for ensuring rightful entitlement under Illinois’ spinal cord injuries laws – because at Carlson Bier everyone matters, every case counts.

Estimating potential case worth can be a complex task given variable conditions playing out differently across distinct scenarios however foreknowledge thereof provides paramount advantage while professing damage claim as it helps setting realistic expectations along the way. After evaluating specifics correspondingly inspect current legal possibilities concerning your spinal injury suit implications by clicking on the button beneath opening world of justified redemption accruing post-SCI traumatic adversity.

Rest assured Carlson Bier spares no effort within bounds of propriety magnifying damage claim returns multifold enabling enhanced strides towards liquidating piled medical expenses meaning lesser economic burden lingereringly causing sleepless nights . So why wait? Turn today’s anxiety into tomorrow’s relief…

Click below now! Because knowing what lies ahead makes negotiating rocky terrains easier and because every spinal cord injury victim deserves an attorney that truly cares.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mendon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mendon

Areas of Practice in Mendon

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Fire Burns

Extending specialist legal help for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Stumble Occurrences

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Damages

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain fair compensation for hurts and losses.

Bike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Incident

Ensuring adept legal advice for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Committed to delivering professional legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Proficient in managing cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Committed to supporting individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer