...

Bicycle Accidents in Mendota

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re involved in a Bicycle Accident within Mendota and need expert legal guidance, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our experienced team of personal injury lawyers understands the intricacies of Illinois bicycle accident laws like the back of our hands. We work diligently to ensure all your rights are protected while aiming for maximum compensation from responsible parties. Riding a bicycle is environmentally friendly and healthy but does carry risks – being hit by a vehicle shouldn’t be one! When these unfortunate incidents happen, drawing upon the expertise of seasoned attorneys like us at Carlson Bier makes navigating through complex legal processes smoother. Being exclusively dedicated to personal injury law has helped hone our skills; making us fit for handling cases involving bike accidents with ease. Allow us to guide you towards achieving justice so that your life can bounce back on track after an unfortunate incident without financial distress clouding over it as well. Partner up with Carlson Bier – where championing victims’ interests isn’t just our statute; it’s ingrained into every fiber of what we do!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Mendota Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to championing the rights of those injured in bicycle accidents throughout Illinois. As a distinguished personal injury law firm, we signify an unwavering commitment to securing justice and rightful compensation for our clients. Accidents involving bicycles can be incredibly complex due to the unique intersection of traffic laws, the inherent vulnerability of cyclists, and intricacies surrounding insurance coverage. Understanding some crucial aspects of these types of accidents is essential.

Culminating years of experience successfully representing victims of such incidents, we’ve gleaned comprehensive insights into matters connected with Bicycle Accidents. It’s imperative to comprehend that bike riders have similar rights on the road as motorists and are protected under state and local bicycle laws.

However, despite existing safety measures, bicyclist injuries often occur due to motorists’ negligence – failing to yield right-of-way at intersections or not maintaining a safe distance being among typical scenarios leading up to an accident.

• A common misconception held by society is that bicyclists are solely responsible for their safety when cycling alongside vehicles. Nevertheless, drivers owe a certain duty of care towards anyone sharing the road with them.

• When a careless driver breaches this responsibility causing harm or loss to the cyclist (property damage or injuries), they become liable.

• This liability may extend beyond drivers; vehicle manufacturers, component makers— any party whose negligence could directly contribute to an accident holds potential culpability.

Cyclists who find themselves victims in such unfortunate circumstances can pursue damages including medical costs arising from immediate treatment as well as future needs related indirectly/directly to accident-induced trauma. Other claimable losses involve wages lost during recovery periods, diminished earning capacity if incapacitated from resuming previous employment roles post-accident along with pain/suffering endured as resultants thereof.

Determining fault within these contexts involves pitfall avoidance since it is not uncommon for opposing parties/insurance companies aiming towards minimizing payouts arguing contributory negligence on the cyclist’s part. This emphasizes the significance of seasoned legal representation to meticulously establish fault boarding onto insurmountable evidence negating any potential blame game scenarios.

At Carlson Bier, our personal injury lawyers meticulously dominate all elements linked with proving liability while aggressively striving for maximum compensation in bicycle accident cases. We’ve persistently perpetuated an enlightened narrative demystifying common fallacies orbiting around cycling accidents providing empathetic yet aggressive advocacy for victims through claim filing and negotiations or trial whenever necessary.

Lastly, we would be remiss not to alert you about Illinois’s unique statute of limitations applicable according to specific incident characteristics where delayed reporting can even risk complete fortitude of your rightful claim! It is critical that bicycle accident victims reach out to competent legal aid as quickly post-accident feasible – beginning instantaneously with on-scene data collection followed by legally advised communication course coordinately complying with said regulatory restrictions.

No one should ever feel helpless following a bicycling accident. At Carlson Bier, we are ready to fight zealously for your interests ensuring diligent pursuit towards availing justice coupled with merited monetary recompense proficiently combating resultant financial distress alongside physical/mental trauma coping demands arising unforeseenly turning lives upside down amidst these unfortunate episodes.

If you’ve already reached this point in your recovery journey researching into possible recourse routes — give yourselves credit! You’re halfway there taking control fighting back Life’s sudden unfair twist getting proactive asserting due rights rightly deserved … not just surviving but thriving under any uncertain circumstances thrown unexpectedly at you by Fate.

To estimate what full justice rendered achieving closure could mean monetarily valuing explored possibilities opening — Click ‘Check Case Worth’ pushing the button below RIGHT NOW making today count creating tomorrows worth looking forward to leaving yesterdays behind aspiring moving onwards upwards embracing healing hope … together rising above adversity affirming life triumphs ultimately over temporary hurdles posed randomly upon us unprepared henceforth resiliently prepared hence!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mendota Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Mendota

Areas of Practice in Mendota

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Offering skilled legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering specialist legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Slip Incidents

Adept in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents receive equitable settlement for hurts and impairment.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Ensuring professional legal assistance for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Impairments

Specializing in providing dedicated legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Death

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer