FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Metamora

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bite injuries can have severe, life-altering consequences. When such an unfortunate event occurs in Metamora, the savvy choice for legal representation is Carlson Bier. Dealing with unwanted trauma and undeserved fallout shouldn’t cause additional stress; that’s where we come in to offer expert guidance and tenacious advocacy. With a wealth of experience dealing with dog bite injury cases across Illinois, Carlson Bier has cemented its reputation as a highly trusted personal injury law firm. Our team commits itself fully demonstrating unwavering dedication when fighting for clients’ rights, working tirelessly to ensure fair compensation for medical bills or lost wages related to your ordeal. Discerning community members consistently choose us because our lawyers embody knowledge precision matched by few firms statewide played out in their recognized track record of success – upholding justice is both our motivation and mission at Carlson Bier . Remember: while healing should always be your priority following a canine-inflicted harm event; it’s equally crucial to enlist legal allies relentless about defending your entitlements under Illinois law with respect to dog bites.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Metamora Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to representing current and potential victims of dog bite injuries. Having a seasoned Illinois personal injury lawyer on your side can significantly amplify the chances of securing reimbursement for medical bills, lost wages, pain, and suffering or other damage inflicted by a canine. Dog bites may seem minor relative to other forms of personal harm; however, they could escalate into severe complications if not addressed properly.

Dog bites are unexpected and traumatic experiences that have the capacity to alter lives permanently. In some cases, these incidents result in substantial physical damage such as nerve damage, disfigurement or worse. Being cognizant about certain key points is essential:

– Proving Liability: It’s pivotal to establish the dog owner’s liability in an incident through reported episodes of earlier aggressive behavior or violation of leash laws.

– Documentation: Documenting the event meticulously can fortify your case robustly. Taking pictures, noting down precise details about what transpired during the accident while it’s still fresh in your head is prudent.

– Medical Assistance: Acquiring timely medical assistance following a dog bite isn’t just crucial to prevent infections but also acts as evidence substantiating the severity of the injury sustained.

Understanding dog bite law in Illinois is integral when considering legal representation for yourself or loved ones who’ve had encounters with violent dogs. The state operates under ‘strict liability’ when it comes to animal attacks. Essentially implying that if someone’s pet behaved aggressively without provocation at a location where its presence was legally authorized — attacking another individual —the owner would be held responsible for any resultant injuries.

Furthermore, proving negligence is instrumental too—in instances where the egregious action didn’t necessarily involve biting but did cause emotional distress like fear leading to panic attacks subsequently causing another form of personal harm—for example falling from stairs due to panic induced mobility

Compensation associated with such cases can potentially reach significant amounts depending upon how severely it impacted you—financially (in terms of medical expenses), mentally (emotional trauma), and physically (the extent of wounds). Ensuring that you are wholly recompensed for your losses is cardinal to Carlson Bier. We embark on a comprehensive claim strategy ensuring each aspect of the aftermath – current and potential, is assessed meticulously.

With several decades worth of combined experience, our personal injury lawyers are proficient at presenting evidence convincingly in court, thereby maximizing possibilities of achieving favorable outcomes. We have recovered millions for victims grappling with unchecked aggression from canines—all the while maintaining absolute loyalty towards ethical practices in accordance with state laws governing dog bite cases.

In proving the owner’s negligence or non-compliance with leash laws, we meticulously construct strong legal arguments backed by profound knowledge about Illinois’ dog bite laws. Our immensity lies not just in courtroom prowess but the credence earned through our focus on personalized attention underpinned by compassion.

At Carlson Bier we don’t merely represent victims of dog bites; instead, we passionately stand for shielding innocent individuals from traumatic experiences inflicted by loose canines which can resultantly tamper their sense of security permanently. Consultations irrespective of opting for further legal assistance remain absolutely free!

If you’ve experienced a dog bite wound recently or know someone who has and believe that pursuing a case might be worth pondering over—then allow us to provide an assessment completely devoid any obligations on part! Simply click on the link below to discern what your case could potentially be valued at without any upfront commitments whatsoever. You’ll only need to inform us whether you’d like to proceed once armed with all necessary information—or even if you’d wish not to—that remains entirely up to you! Knowledge empowers & it’s time for justice now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Metamora Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Metamora

Areas of Practice in Metamora

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering specialist legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering expert legal services for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal support to clients affected by faulty goods.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Tumble Incidents

Professional in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Harms

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable payout for damages and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Trucking Incident

Providing specialist legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Committed to offering specialized legal services for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Passing

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Committed to defending persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440