...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Middlebury

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with dog bite injuries in Middlebury, it’s critical to find a legal team who understands the law and has your best interests at heart. In that regard, nothing surpasses the comprehensive expertise of Carlson Bier. With an impressive record handling personal injury cases across Illinois, they remain deeply vested in obtaining justice for their clients. They understand the potential physical and emotional trauma caused by such incidents and have dedicated their resources towards ensuring victims are fairly compensated for medical bills or resulting damages. Recognizing each case as unique, Carlson Bier provides individual attention to detail, fostering client trust through transparency and consistent communication regarding case progress and expectations. Their extensive knowledge assists them in navigating complex legal processes with ease while consistently focusing on optimal outcomes for those affected by dog bite injuries – making Carlson Bier an intelligent choice when seeking effective representation during these challenging times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Middlebury Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are personal injury attorneys dedicated to helping victims of dog bite injuries in Illinois navigate the complexities of injury claims. As experienced legal professionals, we provide expert counsel and fight diligently for your rights. Our extensive knowledge within this field means that we understand all too well the severity of dog bite injuries, which can be more than simply physical trauma; they can carry immense emotional and psychological distress as well within their wake.

Dog bites could potentially lead to significant medical expenses, lost income due to missed workdays and lasting psychological effects – these factors make up what is known as compensatory damages in legal terms. It is essential to understand not only the immediate ramifications but also potential future consequences related to such an event. The importance of receiving fair compensation cannot be understated.

• Pain & Suffering: A victim may seek compensation for pain endured both at the time of the incident and any continual or chronic pain that arises directly from it.

• Medical Expenses: This includes cost of ambulance services, hospital visits, medication prescriptions, therapy sessions, surgical procedures or any other necessary treatment aimed at recovery.

• Loss of Income: If a dog bite prevents you from working temporarily or permanently hampers career progression doling out a significant blow to potential earning ability.

• Emotional Distress: Dog bites often lead to severe anxiety issues including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and fear phobias which may qualify for compensation.

Our expertise lies within ensuring rightful justice through providing powerful representation on your behalf against the negligent parties involved while aiding with collection and preparation of robust evidence pivotal towards building a strong case. We address every instance with vigilance understanding that every moment counts when dealing with personal injury cases – especially those involving little ones who are most vulnerable to such incidents.

Being subjected to a dog bite isn’t anyone’s fault nor should victims bear financial burdens originating from another individual’s negligence. And proving liability requires navigating complex legal waters that demand expertise and dedication, which our firm consistently brings to the table.

As a team of committed personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, we extend our services to everyone within the state ensuring outspread reach devoid of any location limitations; never treading against integrity by proclaiming presence in cities where we lack physical offices but instead striving to be accessible and accommodating for those considering legal action post-incident.

In conclusion, every dog bite case incubates unique variables – whether it’s determining the severity or liability. But ultimately they pivot around one fundamental fact – suffering from someone else’s negligence demands justice. And at Carlson Bier, we insist upon it for you.

Our professional guidance empowers you towards making informed decisions on important matters involved during your claim process while offering reliable support as we stand by your side during trying times.

Get started today by clicking on the button below for a free assessment to determine how much your dog bite injury case may potentially be worth. Our commitment is driven by an unwavering objective – securing justice for victims through fair compensation delivered promptly. With Carlson Bier, you are not alone!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Middlebury Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Middlebury

Areas of Practice in Middlebury

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying expert legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Carelessness

Providing expert legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal services to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents receive appropriate settlement for wounds and harm.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering specialist legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in ensuring professional legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Expert in defending patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​