...

Bicycle Accidents in Minier

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal assistance after a bicycle accident in Minier, Carlson Bier stands as an expert choice. Boasting vast experience and proven results, Carlson Bier has gained unwavering trust for diligent representation of bike collision victims. With expertise covering all complexities linked to bike accidents — from case review through negotiations or trial proceedings— the law firm is devoted to fighting staunchly on behalf of injured cyclists’ rights throughout Illinois. This commitment underlines their deep understanding of this specialty area — delivering outstanding service with attention to detail and comprehensive knowledge of local traffic laws and safety regulations affecting bicyclists. Besides its primary strength in litigation, clients engage with Carlson Bier due to their approachable team members who guide you empathetically during such trying times, ensuring peace-of-mind every step along the way towards achieving rightful compensation for your physical injuries or property damages. Consider consulting the experts at Carlson Bier when navigating post-bicycle accident legalities; embodying dedication and action-oriented services within reach invariably positions them as a top-notch ally for affected bikers across Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Minier Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to our clients’ peace of mind and securing justice for victims of bicycle accidents in Illinois. Bicycle accidents can be harrowing experiences that leave individuals with substantial injuries and large medical bills. A cyclist hit by a vehicle has rights, recognized by law, to seek compensation for damages incurred from the negligence of others.

Understanding the specifics related to bicycle accidents is critical. One key point is that under Illinois law, bicycles are granted the same privileges as motor vehicle drivers on roads and highways. To elaborate, cyclists must adhere to traffic laws but conversely also possess equal right-of-way on roadways.

Perhaps you’ve wondered about preferable cycling locations – should cyclists stick to sidewalks or use main roads? Legally speaking in Illinois, bicyclists can ride on sidewalks except where prohibited by local ordinances. However caution dictates that it’s safer to use roadways or designated bike lanes if accessible; statistics reveal pedestrians-involved incidents happen more frequently on sidewalks.

It’s equally important noting that safety equipment does not guarantee prevention of accidents but emphasizes protection when they occur. For instance wearing helmets approved by ANSI or Snell may lessen head trauma severity during collisions while visibility gear enhances recognition in lower light conditions, potentially aiding accident avoidance.

A further significant topic regarding bicycle crashes pertains to ‘dooring’ incidents – instances where cyclists collide with abruptly opened car doors often resulting into serious injuries including fractures, concussions even fatalities sometimes. While this issue remains prevalent in urban settings with heavy parking along streetsides; please note such actions are deemed illegal according several state statutes consolidating cyclists’ legal positions during litigation.

The aftermath of a bicycle accident could be a complicated time fraught with physical pain combined with anxiety regarding legal complexities involved being a victimised party. These might encompass questions surrounding rightful compensation amounts attached to sustained injuries alongside loss computation concerning earning capacities due work absences instigated through recovery periods following such incident-induced traumas.

Let Carlson Bier guide you through the intricate legal maze, supporting and advocating for your cause. Our experienced attorney team understands Illinois’ traffic laws intricately to better navigate your case; we’ll help identify who’s at fault, whether it’s drivers, local government entities or bicycle manufacturers that bear responsibility depending on circumstances surrounding each distinctive accident instance. We work tenaciously to ensure our clients secure rightful compensation covering medical bills along with lost wages alongside pain and suffering attached with such incidents.

We encourage any individual involved in a bicycle crash in Illinois seeking adept legal support offering emphatic understanding of their tumultuous life phase turn into answers – refrain from settling for less than what is rightfully yours following such unsettling events disrupting all facets associated with leading normal lives. It’s crucial remembering time limits do apply regarding filing personal injury lawsuit under Illinois law termed ‘statute of limitations.’ Thus swift action proves both necessary and advisable to safeguard right of receiving fullest possible compensation.

Ready to understand your available options” Press the button below now to discover what your personal injury claim might be worth. Let us transform disarray emerging out of unfortunate encounters into a structured avenue towards attaining justice ensuring bicycle incidents don’t end up debilitating your spirit alongside testing physical fortitudes unduly! Trust Carlson Bier – Your ally through stormy times.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Minier Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Minier

Areas of Practice in Minier

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving skilled legal support for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing expert legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing adept legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Fall Mishaps

Skilled in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents secure appropriate settlement for wounds and harm.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Collision

Offering professional legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for hurts.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in delivering specialized legal representation for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Focused on advocating for victims with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer