...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Minier

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have encountered a dog bite injury in Minier, Carlson Bier is your optimal choice for legal representation. Facing a dog bites incident can be traumatic and life-altering; hence, it’s crucial to seek the service of skilled attorneys who possess extensive experience in this area of law. Known significantly throughout Illinois for their proactive approach towards such cases, Carlson Bier ensures that victims’ rights are well fortified and justice duly served. Our team not only possesses thorough knowledge about the specific nuances involved with animal attack lawsuits but also has demonstrated success in numerous bureaucracies surrounding them. We assess every subtle detail while investigating an occurrence to formulate robust legal strategies tailored uniquely to your situation. Understanding that each Dog Bite Injury case carries its unique complexities, we provide personalized care coupled with aggressive advocacy aiming at maximum compensation for our clients’ pain and suffering, medical bills, lost wages among others determinants contingent on individual circumstances. Choosing Carlson Bier provides you an assertive pursuit of fairness allied with compassionate counsel during these challenging times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Minier Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that suffering a dog bite injury can be painful and traumatic. Compounding the physical anguish are medical bills, potential loss of income and possibly permanent disfigurement or disability. As personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our primary objective is to guide victims through these challenging times by offering experienced legal representation geared towards securing adequate compensation for their injuries.

Dog bites rank among the most common types of personal injury cases in Illinois. If you or a loved one have suffered from a dog bite incident, it’s vital to understand your legal rights and entitlements under Illinois law to help you navigate the course to recovery and remuneration.

• Strict Liability State: The first thing to note about Illinois Dog Bite Law is that it operates under ‘strict liability.’ This simply means that the dog owner is held responsible if their dog injures another person, with limited exceptions.

• Reasonable Care: However, strict liability will only apply if you were legally permitted to be where the attack occurred and not provoking the animal at that time.

However complex your situation seems, navigating these requirements becomes more straightforward with expert legal counsel like Carlson Bier on your side!

It’s pertinent also to address some misconceptions around dog bites. Contrary to popular belief;

● A history of aggression is not necessary for a claim: Many victims often erroneously think they can’t seek restitution because the offending canine never displayed prior aggressive behavior before their incident; this couldn’t be further from reality. Under Illinois’ strict liability laws, such history isn’t necessary when filing a claim against the owner of an injurious pet.

● Breeds don’t matter in claims: It doesn’t categorically matter what breed bit you – all dogs are considered equal under state law thus removing any discriminatory aspect regarding breed-specific aggression legislation.

By rectifying these myths surrounding dog bites and enlightening victims on tangible facts related – we ensure clients are rightfully informed and their rights ethically protected.

If a claim is approved, victims could be compensated for

• Medical treatment including hospital visits, surgeries, medication.

• Lost income due to time off work.

• Pain and suffering including emotional distress.

At Carlson Bier our approach ensures focused attention on your unique case; providing compassionate counsel while aggressively pursuing justice on your behalf. Every victim’s story is different – the circumstances of the bite, its location and severity or if there exist any complicating factors such as infections resulting from it – every detail matters. Additionally, assessing the comprehensive damage after a dog bite isn’t only about injuries seen on the surface. It extends into rehabilitating aspects like psychological trauma which are intangible yet severely impactful.

Trust in our determination at Carlson Bier to help ascertain what damages you can feasibly recover under Illinois law. Delving deep into each situation, we endeavor to ensure no aspect of impact is overlooked so as not to inaccurately diminish deserved compensation.

As your dedicated personal injury lawyers in Illinois – rest assured that whether through negotiation within insurance claims processing confines or should it escalate towards rigorous litigation; we are fully committed towards securing just outcome proportional to incurred losses along with pain caused by such incidents.

Navigating strict liability laws needn’t seem daunting prospect with Carlson Bier at helm – bolstering confidence throughout proceedings until reaching closure both fair and satisfactory.

Deciding if or when legal action is right choice post incident shouldn’t drown you in anxiety instead focus should remain steadfastly upon recovery while keeping damaging stressors loosely tethered away; this becomes possible having professionals renowned for competence like us handling these intricate complexities professionally on your behalf knowing they’re befittingly equipped understanding state-specific criterion alleviating burdensome retrievals optimistically guiding resultant prospects fruition perceptive guidance duly asserting rightful redressal holds paramount part resolution process guided diligently navigating legally convoluted terrain ensuring received acquires full benefit requisite procedural efficacy.

We know the value of your case, and you should too. Understanding what you are entitled to under Illinois law is a crucial step in winning fair compensation for dog bite injuries. We invite you to click on the button below, enter some details about your experience and discover the potential value of your claim. Secure your future by getting equipped with the knowledge of how much justice through compensation could potentially look like for you. Let Carlson Bier guide you towards healing not merely in body– but also financially hardening resilience through justifiable remuneration following distressful occurrences such as dog bites; making recovery journey smoother restoring semblance normalcy aftermath arduous ordeal thereby empathetically offering empowering pathway forward out tormenting shadows towards hopeful light once more

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Minier Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Minier

Areas of Practice in Minier

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Giving skilled legal advice for patients of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal representation for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Tumble Incidents

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting patients of car accidents receive fair recompense for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing representation for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Crash

Delivering expert legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for hurts.

Building Collisions

Dedicated to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Committed to extending expert legal representation for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to advocating for clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​