Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mitchell

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has sustained a spinal cord injury, Carlson Bier is your ideal choice for legal representation. Based in Illinois, our experienced and dedicated team ensures that each case receives the highest level of attention. We specialize in complex cases involving catastrophic injuries like those affecting the spinal cord, where victims often face life-altering consequences due to others’ negligence. Our firm’s deep understanding of medical terminologies related to spinal cord injuries enables us to establish stronger cases for our clients efficiently.

Proven track record? Yes! We’re proud of notable victories we’ve obtained on behalf of individuals who’ve suffered such severe trauma–giving families peace amid distressing times by achieving maximum compensation entitled under law.

Although Mitchell isn’t physically home to one of our establishments – we exhibit an impressive grasp over disputes originating from this area as well; demonstrating unwavering commitment towards protecting your rights and securing substantial settlements regardless of geographical boundaries.

Our promptness, diligence and personalized approach reflect why countless clients entrust their plight into the capable hands at Carlson Bier—the golden standard when seeking justice for debilitating spinal cord injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mitchell Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your personal injury attorney group in Illinois specialized in an array of complex and sensitive issues, foremost amongst these being Spinal Cord Injuries.

Spinal cord injuries often present uniquely complicated cases due to the multiple facets that can influence them. This may range from determining liability correctly, establishing negligence with strong evidence, accurately assessing medical costs both presently and future-oriented, and negotiating fair compensation for non-economic harm such as quality-of-life decrease or emotional distress. The mission at our firm is fundamentally about connecting intricate legal concepts to the lived experience of those affected by spinal cord injuries.

A critical task is understanding the extent of a spinal cord injury. These injuries range from incomplete (where there is still some function below the level of injury) and complete (no sensation or movement below level of injury). Within these categories are many subtypes including paraplegia (affects all or part of legs), quadriplegia, otherwise known as tetraplegia (impacts all four limbs plus torso), along with varying degrees therein.

• The central importance of immediate trauma care: A mishandled initial response can exacerbate the eventual damage sustained from the incident.

• Rehabilitation therapy’s immense value: It bears emphasizing that prompt implementation can greatly improve long-term recovery outcomes.

• Surgical interventions’ potential role: At times they signify necessary last-ditch efforts to limit permanent damage following an accident.

• Lifelong consequences to consider: Beyond physical repercussions exist latent psychological dimensions; financial burdens also need careful consideration given their substantial potential impact on victims’ lifestyles post-surgery/recovery.

The experienced legal team at Carlson Bier possesses vast knowledge spanning these levels and implications—a vitally essential asset when arguing for maximum compensation amounts during settlement negotiations or court proceedings if necessary. Our empathic approach ensures we fight passionately for clients experiencing this devastating form of personal injury while maintaining dedication toward keeping you informed at every stage—we work tirelessly so you can focus solely on recovery.

Navigating the legal landscape post-spinal cord injury should never be a solo endeavor. The stakes are too high to risk under-compensation or erroneous fault attribution, and understanding nuances requires dedicated expertise we bring to your side. Employing a professional personal injury attorney such as those found at Carlson Bier ensures thorough investigation into every viable avenue for remuneration, seeks justice for wrongful harm inflicted, and upholds the seriousness of your experiences in order that the legal system serves him or her properly.

In Illinois law’s realm, there are specific procedures and parameters one must navigate when claiming compensatory damages due to spinal cord injuries; missing any of these critical details may result in denied claims or vastly decreased settlements—a cost most victims cannot afford mentally or financially. Hiring an expert attorney guarantees that your case will be handled promptly and correctly, while also ensuring maximum possible compensation given your specific circumstances.

To better understand why Carlson Bier stands out amongst personal injury attorneys in Illinois: Our firm prioritizes open communication channels throughout all processes, emotional support alongside our unwavering legal assistance (extending above and beyond industry norms), exhaustive research in verifying negligence/liability, accurate calculation values owed to clients in potential settlement figures—given multifaceted components mentioned earlier—plus stringent preparation should things progress past mediation stages onto courtroom trials.

From what has been highlighted about spinal cord injuries here, it is apparent how complex these cases get even before getting into individual circumstance intricacies. It’s important you receive fitting representation meeting this complexity head-on with authoritative acumen—which is precisely where our expertise comes into play at Carlson Bier.

Click below now to discover an approximation of what financial recompense value could be awaiting based on specifics regarding your spinal cord injury case. Remember: Nothing surpasses having experienced counsel guiding through tangled legal webs—Carlson Bier personal injury attorneys stand ready assisting toward achieving just outcomes deserved.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mitchell Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mitchell

Areas of Practice in Mitchell

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering adept legal support for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal representation for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Slip Occurrences

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for hurts and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Trucking Mishap

Offering specialist legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal representation to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on defending victims with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer