...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Momence

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re seeking exceptional legal representation for dog bite injuries in Momence, Carlson Bier is the premier choice. Our attorney group specializes in personal injury circumstances, particularly those arising from canine-related incidents. We have honed our proficiency to secure excellent outcomes for victims of dog bites or attacks and are ready to navigate through these complex cases with skillful defense plans tailored to your specific situation. A victim’s plight becomes our mandate as we relentlessly pursue justice equipped with years of experience and a deep understanding of Illinois’ state laws concerning personal injuries caused by dogs. Engaging Carlson Bier means gaining the support of lawyers who anticipate obstacles, strategize around them, and prioritize robust advocacy that ultimately serves you best at court proceedings or settlement negotiations. Opt for safety consciousness alongside top-notch legal services; choose Carlson Bier when dealing with unfortunate events such as dog bite injuries in Momence; rest assured that dedication towards securing optimal results goes unparalleled within our professional practice realm.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Momence Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are not just dedicated to pursuing justice for victims of personal injury; we consider it our mission to turn their worst times into an opportunity for renewed hope. One of the common cases we handle is dog bite injuries—a phenomenon far too commonplace in Illinois—and a traumatic experience that no one should go through alone.

Dog bites can result in several different types of harm which include physical injuries, emotional trauma, and financial losses resulting from medical bills or lost wages during recovery. Serious dog bite injuries can cause permanent scarring or disfigurement. They may even require surgical intervention depending on severity so proper legal representation is paramount.

Here at Carlson Bier, we offer exceptional support and legal advice to navigate the complexities associated with such cases. Our commitment runs deep—spoken clearly by our successful track record helping victims secure fair compensation they deserve. However, navigating this process necessitates understanding some fundamental issues:

• The Victim’s Rights: In Illinois, the victim has a right to full compensation if the owner of the dog failed to prevent the attack when off-leash or unrestrained.

• Understanding Liability: An owner becomes liable if their pet bites someone without provocation—even if the animal has shown no previous signs of aggression.

• Statute Of Limitations: Legal actions related to dog-bite incidents must be brought within two years from date of incident as per Illinois law.

The aftermath of a dog bite incident can leave victims feeling overwhelmed both physically and emotionally—hence why working with expert legal practitioners like us comes with undeniable benefits:

• Expert Legal Advice: You’ll receive specialist guidance informed by decades-worth knowledge handling similar cases.

• Comprehensive Case Evaluation: We scrutinize every angle surrounding your occurrence ensuring all avenues leading to maximum possible restitution are explored.

• Hassle-Free Process: With our expertise running point you’re afforded peace-of-mind needed towards focusing solely on recovery.

We take great pride in providing personalized service, understanding that no two dog bite cases are alike. We are always ready to listen, taking into account your unique circumstances in order to pursue an outcome that truly reflects the harm you’ve suffered. At Carlson Bier, we strive for nothing short of a full recovery process—from healing physical wounds to negating financial burdens inflicted.

While immediate medical attention is undoubtedly crucial after a dog bite incident, seeking legal advice should also be top on one’s agenda going forward. It’s important these steps be undertaken swiftly and without delay—in ensuring accountability is met leading towards closure from this traumatic affair.

We understand that questions will arise about what to do next or how good standing your case may be—which is why we offer free initial consultations enabling us insight into particulars surrounding your ordeal. This allows for personalized approach tailored towards building robust case in pursuit of maximum possible compensation.

Dog bites can have severe long-term impact beyond mere physical injury, encompassing emotional distress and potential PTSD episodes which could last years if left unresolved. It’s vital having a team like Carlson Bier working alongside ensures every facet relating such repercussions—even those less discernible—are addressed fully with adequate restitution sought.

At Carlson Bier, our prime source of motivation pivots around securing justice for victims belonging to our home state—a cause we remain wholly dedicated towards championing resolutely regardless scenario at hand. Whatever hills lay ahead during these trying times—rest assured knowing there’s complete peace-of-mind awaiting you here besides us.

When it comes down to it; resilience embodies Illinoisans through and through—with shared belief any obstacle can indeed be conquered given right guidance on board—and who better equipped offering semblance reassurance than personal Injury attorneys at Carlton Bier?

Knowledge is power—especially when it pertains navigating the legal landscape revolving around dog-bite injuries within Illinois jurisdiction. But knowledge alone isn’t enough—it’s applying said knowledge with grit tenacity pointedly under guidance expert professionals becomes game changer altogether.

Want to find out what your case is worth? Don’t guess—let our seasoned expertise provide a comprehensive evaluation tailored specifically around particulars surrounding your circumstance. Click on the button below for a no-obligation consultation and together let’s explore how we can turn this difficult situation into an opportunity for you to receive the justice and compensation that you deserve.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Momence Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Momence

Areas of Practice in Momence

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving adept legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving defective products, extending professional legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Fall Accidents

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their injuries.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate payout for damages and losses.

Motorbike Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering expert legal representation for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to offering specialized legal support for clients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to assisting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​