FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Momence

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When an unfortunate pedestrian accident occurs in Momence, the legal expertise of Carlson Bier becomes crucial. With a reputation built on years of achieving favorable outcomes for clients who have suffered personal injury, our team is highly experienced in addressing complex situations revolving around pedestrian accidents. We navigate extensively through the intricacies of Illinois law to champion your rights effectively and ensure you get the justice you deserve. At Carlson Bier, we understand that every case is unique – we approach each scenario with customized strategies aiming at maximum compensation for our clients. Our unwavering commitment ensures that all aspects regarding liability, insurance coverage, medical bills and lost earnings are adequately addressed during legal proceedings. As your trusted counsel throughout this difficult time, we offer unparalleled guidance and support while working tirelessly on your claim to resolution or trial if necessary. Choosing Carlson Bier as your Pedestrian Accident attorney introduces you to an ally dedicated towards safeguarding your interests; reinforcing why we remain a premier option for personal injury representation across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Momence Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in a comprehensive range of personal injury cases with particular emphasis on pedestrian accidents. Standing at the forefront of personal injury law within Illinois, we take pride in our unwavering commitment to delivering justice and due compensation for victims of pedestrian accidents.

Pedestrian accident law is an area of legal practice that focuses on incidents where pedestrians are injured by motor vehicles. These types of accidents, unfortunately all too common, often lead to severe injuries or even fatalities because pedestrians simply do not have any form of protection against the impact of a vehicle.

We offer strategic guidance built on years of professional experience and intimate understanding of Illinois pedestrian accident laws. Adopting a compassionate approach towards each client’s unique situation, Carlson Bier ensures every case is meticulously analyzed to uncover potential areas for redress available under the law.

There are several crucial aspects one needs to understand concerning pedestrian accident cases:

• Duty Of Care: Every driver has a duty of care towards pedestrians. This means that drivers are required to operate their vehicles responsibly and avoid causing harm.

• Establish Fault: It’s critical to determine who was at fault in the collision – whether it’s entire fault lies with the driver or if there is shared responsibility between the pedestrian and motorist.

• Statute Of Limitations: In Illinois, you typically have two years from the date of accident to file a lawsuit aiming for compensation for personal injury.

• Compensation Covers Several Aspects: The victim can be compensated not only for medical expenses but also for lost earnings due to inability work after being injured as well as pain and suffering they experienced as result.

When it comes to navigating through these complexities, relying on expert legal advice can dramatically enhance your possibility securing full compensation entitled under law. At Carlson Bier, we strive tirelessly advocate our clients’ rights ensuring best possible outcomes.

Surviving victims and families affected by such regrettable instances deserve expert legal assistance that empathizes with their situation and effectively advocates on their behalf. This is where the expertise of Carlson Bier comes to fore. We have built a solid reputation as steadfast allies for victims, consistently striving to prioritize our clients’ best interests and acting decisively to help them recover maximum compensation.

We promise an uncompromising commitment towards helping you navigate through the complexities of your situation while equipping you with invaluable insights into Illinois pedestrian accident law. In these trying times, allow us at Carlson Bier to provide the unwavering support and guidance you deserve.

Remember, each pedestrian accident case is unique and thus demands tailored legal strategies that take all facts into account. Let our team conduct a thorough examination of your case backed by comprehensive legal knowledge and strategy development honed over years of successful practice.

Your journey towards justice can begin today. We welcome you to explore how much your case may be worth by availing yourself of our free case evaluation tool located below this page—an efficient way for you to understand what potential compensation might be due in light of your individual circumstances. At Carlson Bier, we remain committed toward assisting personal injury victims reclaim control over their lives after debilitating accidents.

Please click on the button below to discover potential value for your claim. With our commitment towards advocating pedestrian victims’ rights— coupled with unparalleled proficiency in handling such cases – we strive facilitate smoother paths towards recovery justice deserved.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Momence Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Momence

Areas of Practice in Momence

Bike Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying adept legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Ensuring expert legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal help to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Slip Mishaps

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Accidents: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for wounds and losses.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Offering experienced legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Construction Accidents

Committed to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Backbone Harm

Expert in assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​