FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Monee

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a sensitive situation like a dog bite injury in Monee, seeking legal assistance becomes paramount. This is where Carlson Bier comes into the picture. As experienced personal injury attorneys, we specialize in dog bite injuries cases and have an impressive track record of successful outcomes. We understand the physical pain, emotional trauma and financial burden such incidents can bring along. Our team strives to alleviate these burdens by diligently fighting for your rights while ensuring full compliance with Illinois law procedures.

Our deep understanding of nuanced local statutes coupled with our unwavering commitment helps us negotiate or litigate claims efficiently – assuring you get justice served right! We not only represent your case aggressively but also provide compassionate support during this trying time, keeping your best interest at heart always!

The goal is simple: protect your rights and help avail optimal compensation without delay! Choose Carlson Bier as your trusted partner because nobody understands Dog Bite Injuries better than we do; after all, achieving client satisfaction through proficient services has been our prime ethos from day one! Let us unleash our expertise for you.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Monee Illinois

Dog bite injuries are one of the most complex matters that are handled by Carlson Bier, a premier personal injury law firm based in Illinois. We understand the pain and trauma associated with such incidents and how it can leave an indelible mark on your life. Dog bites carry a weighty significance under personal injury law as they present unique challenges making proper legal guidance crucial for victims.

Our adept team at Carlson Bier brings you abundant expertise aimed to provide significant value to you, the reader, by enlightening you about various facets of dog bite injuries through this page. First off, being aware of the Illinois Leash Law is essential for everyone residing in this state. It mandates that dogs must be restrained when not on the owner’s property implicating that any bite occasioned off-property makes owners liable for any damage caused by their pets.

Secondly, dog owners have an obligation to manage dangerous or territorial animals appropriately. If they fail to take reasonable steps to abate animal aggression leading to a biting incident, then they might be held responsible for neglectful behavior under ‘One-Bite Rule’. This rule implies that negligence can form grounds for legal action even if it marks the pet’s first aggressive act.

Another key aspect lies within understanding the gravity of physical and psychological suffering that arises following a dog attack – beyond severe bodily harm which may include lacerations, puncture wounds or bone fractures; victims often face intense mental setbacks such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), phobia or anxiety and other stress-related disorders.

Economic losses stemming from these traumatic incidents add another layer of distress due to mounting medical bills including emergency treatment, surgeries, pharmaceuticals and long-term therapy sessions along with loss of earning capacity where work hours get compromised during recovery period which indeed builds up into considerable financial strain.

Presenting all this evidence efficiently via robust legal representation forms basis for effective settlement negotiations or trial proceedings marking success path towards securing deserved compensation for physical and emotional harm inflicted.

At Carlson Bier, we don’t only advocate for you but also empower you by providing the right information so that you are armed with knowledge when approaching such complex scenarios. Working relentlessly to ensure swift justice as your trusted confidante, we go above and beyond usual client-advocate relationship to weave a long-lasting bond founded upon trust.

Remember, being bitten does not necessarily mean that it’s the end of the world for you. You have rights, and they ought to be upheld at all costs. However, enforcing these rights requires professional assistance from someone who understands all aspects of Illinois dog bite law thus raising your chances of winning or settling favorably in court over this personal injury claim.

Walk us through your ordeal today by clicking the button below to receive an evaluation about what your case worth might look like. Allow our highly skilled personal injury attorneys to step into picture waiting readily with comprehensive guidance encompassing every inch of recovery journey towards restoring peace back into your life.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Monee Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Monee

Areas of Practice in Monee

Bicycle Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending specialist legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing adept legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Trip Incidents

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents get reasonable compensation for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Providing adept legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for hurts.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in providing professional legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Expert in supporting clients with paralysis, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440