FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Monticello

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a dog bite injury in Monticello, it’s crucial to have an experienced legal team advocating for you. That’s where Carlson Bier comes into play— our dedicated team has demonstrated expertise in handling these complex cases rigorously and with empathy. Understanding Illinois laws related to canine aggression is key when seeking justice; therefore, we place priority on navigating these specific ordinances diligently. Our impressive track record reflects a proficient understanding of this nuanced area, ensuring that your interests are safeguarded efficiently at every turn. The aftermath of such incidents can be stressful; henceforth Carlson Bier puts extreme emphasis on minimizing your burden while maximizing compensation. As seasoned negotiators and diligent litigators handling dog bite injuries, we pledge to provide unrelenting advocacy throughout the process. Our reputation represents conflict resolution prowess —considering us for your case is making an informed choice towards obtaining maximum recovery under Illinois law for all damages inflicted by these taxing events.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Monticello Illinois

Dog bites can be equally traumatizing as they are painful, leading to severe injuries that may require substantial medical treatment. At Carlson Bier Associates in Illinois, our talented team of personal injury lawyers is experienced with such issues and is committed to guiding victims through the challenging path towards achieving their deserved compensation. And while any animal attack poses a profound risk, dog bites account for an estimated 85% of all animal-related injuries. Certainly, data like these underscore how crucial it is for everyone to perceive both the gravity and commonality associated with them.

Victims should understand the range of potential repercussions lurking within the aftermath of a dog bite injury. Physical consequences often span beyond simple wounds; severe cases might involve infections or necessitate extensive surgeries to repair torn tissues, muscles or ligaments–sometimes even reconstructive procedures become necessary if facial disfigurement occurs. Alongside these visible symptoms lie unseen psychological effects like anxiety or PTSD, which could linger long after physical healing completes.

The law surrounding dog bites in Illinois stands on your side. As a strict liability state for dog bite incidents, this means that owners hold accountability for their pets’ actions irrespective of whether any previous violence has ensued from their pets; hence rendering ‘one free bite’ rule irrelevant within its boundaries.

Highlighted key points about Illinois Dog Bite Laws comprise:

– Filing suit within a two-year statute limitation period from the date you were bitten.

– Documenting evidence carefully by seizing photographs not only of inflicted wounds but also where the incident occurred etc.

– Preventing yourself from signing anything before hiring an injury lawyer who specializes in dog bites.

Your legal right includes holding responsible parties accountable and collecting damages covering medical expenses incurred due to the incidence – hospital bills, medications and rehabilitation fees included – moreover lost wages if unable work following a recovery period along with non-economic damages such as pain and suffering endured because of the situation.

Yet despite having law firmly established on victim’s sides – overcoming the intricate processes that individual cases usually feature is another matter in itself. Leveraging our practice’s expertise at Carlson Bier Associates would swiftly simplify these complexities. Our team proficiently handles numerous dog bite injury claims each year, tailoring unique strategies to meet distinct case requirements whilst always considering present and future outlays you might face–both of medical or personal type.

At Carlson Bier Associates, we can evaluate your claim initially for free, determining whether sufficient grounds exist for a successful lawsuit. We operate on a contingency basis meaning there are no upfront fees; our remuneration comes as a percentage from any settlement or verdict won on behalf of clients – No Win, No Fee Policy. This partnership guarantees a risk-free environment when hiring us; you only bear costs if we win the case.

Our commitment extends beyond office boundaries catering to clients throughout Illinois State – excluding Monticello due to law prohibitions. Rest assured, regardless of where you’ve experienced your mishap within state borders, our competent team is willing and able to don their legal armors battling for justice with dedication and resilience.

Understanding the depth of trauma ensuing after such distressing events paired with cynical financial pressures oftentimes make victims feel helpless worsening their plight further still…That’s why it’s crucial not waiting too long before seeking legal aid: pursuing efficient timely measures is critical during recovery periods ideally undertaken alongside professional guidance; allowing victims focusing solely upon healing without additional stress yet ensuring they receive appropriate compensation deserved through legal justice.

And while every dog bite incident might seem overwhelming given its violent nature coupled with possible litigation proceedings involved thereafter – having specialized lawyers like ours by your side could significantly improve odds considerably; rest easy knowing an expert group devotedly upholding your rights is tirelessly working in favor behind scenes reflecting real differences within outcomes achieved eventually.

If you’ve undergone an unfortunate event of suffering dogs-inflicted wounds – allow us helping steer past choppy waves tossing uncertainty around towards a tomorrow where justice prevails. Thus, we steadfastly encourage you to reach out for our legal expertise available within your reach – clicking the below button might be the empowering-stand against odds illuminating the potential value of your case. Because at Carlson Bier Associates, we stand strong advocating justice via education and service–translating complex laws into simpler everyday language accessible aside actionable insights; ultimately leading towards experiencing real differences through award-winning results that truly matter…after all, helping navigate victims rightfully is why we do what we do.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Monticello Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Monticello

Areas of Practice in Monticello

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Offering skilled legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Carelessness

Extending specialist legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Tumble Injuries

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents gain just settlement for injuries and losses.

Bike Accidents

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Trucking Mishap

Providing professional legal assistance for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to offering specialized legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Specializing in advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440