FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Morris

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a spinal cord injury can be life-altering, and navigating the legal complexities surrounding such trauma presents additional stress. Carlson Bier, an esteemed Illinois law firm specializing in personal injury lawsuits, offers its top-tier representation specifically targeted towards those with spinal cord injuries. Our team possesses extensive experience and intricate understanding of these complex cases. We assertively fight for our clients to ensure they receive maximum compensation for their suffering while providing compassionate guidance during this challenging time.

Unlike other law firms that generalize their focus area, our specialization provides us with a unique edge when it comes to battling insurance companies attempting to undervalue your claim. With an impressive track record in financial settlements secured for prior clients who’ve experienced similar hardship across various cities including Morris—Carlson Bier is undoubtedly your ideal choice.

Seeking professional legal advice is critical after sustaining any serious harm like a spinal cord injury; hence it’s crucial you align yourself with attorneys who genuinely understand the medical nuances involved – It’s precisely where we excel at Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Morris Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact that a spinal cord injury can have on your life and well-being. This catastrophic event often leads to an immense alteration in one’s quality of life that extends beyond physical pain: emotional trauma, extensive medical care, loss of income are some prevalent aftermaths. Our role as a prominent Illinois-based law firm is to ensure you receive comprehensive legal representation tailored to your unique needs when grappling with spinal cord injuries.

These sorts of injuries most commonly originate from traffic collisions, falls, sports accidents, and violence – incidents frequently involving negligence or malpractice. The sad reality is that they can lead to paralysis varying in degrees (quadriplegia or paraplegia) depending on the severity and location of the damage. Understandably then, receiving professional guidance becomes crucial under these circumstances; something which we at Carroll Bier consistently strive to achieve.

Key information concerning spinal cord injuries embraces several factors:

– Spinal Cord Anatomy: Divided into four main sections; cervical vertebrae (neck), thoracic vertebrae (upper back), lumbar vertebrae (lower back), sacrum/coccyx (base). Injury can result in partial or full loss of motor function/sensory capabilities.

– Classification: Depending on the extent and localization of injury, classification ranges from ‘complete’—total lack of sensory/motor function below the level of injury—to ‘incomplete’—some residual function remains post-injury.

– Expert Prognosis & Potential Complications: Specialists consider elements like age, overall health status before assessing recovery prospects. Potential post-injury complications include pressure sores/ulcers, bladder/bowel dysfunction, respiratory issues among others.

Our commitment at Carlson Bier revolves around amplifying awareness about such intricate dynamics while ensuring our clients navigate through their personal injury claims unimpededly and with confidence stemming from updated knowledge.

We believe in thorough advocacy, taking on insurance companies and negligent parties that try to impede the proper settlement process. Our commitment to justice goes beyond the courtroom—we’re there helping you understand your medical expenses, navigate rehabilitation processes, cope with job loss or diminished earning capacity and adjust to new living conditions.

Remember – it’s not just about winning your case; it’s about securing a future where your needs resulting from spinal cord injuries are fully considered and aptly addressed, whether they be medical or rehabilitative aid, employment accommodations, or emotional and psychological support.

Trust our team at Carlson Bier for effective legal representation. We provide consistent communication all through your case because we believe in being there genuinely for each of our clients—positioning ourselves as a pillar of strength during their most trying time. We pride ourselves on operating completely within Illinois laws without falsely representing our physical premises’ location—further cementing our role as honest and reliable legal advisers putting the client’s interests at heart first.

It’s fundamental that you do right by yourself by aligning with a law firm that has an intrinsic understanding of personal injury cases specifically spinal cord-related ones—a function we’ve tirelessly perfected over years in operation here at Carlson Bier.

To wrap up this outline perfectly: You are not alone in this battle. Recovery is multifaceted, yes—but so is our approach towards ensuring you garner nothing but precise compensation fitting every aspect of your altered life circumstances post-injury.

Empower yourself today. Know what you stand to gain with us battling alongside every step of the way—isn’t securing your deserved compensation worth exploring further? Don’t leave money on the table because someone else was at fault for causing a serious injury that drastically impacted your life trajectory—it doesn’t have to end there.

Click on the button below now to a valuable free evaluation of how much exactly might your case worth? Rest assured knowing Carlson Bier’s dedication applied fully in getting back your life closer to what it was pre-injury, one legal stride at a time. Experience the real tangible difference we bring about today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Morris Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Morris

Areas of Practice in Morris

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or risky conditions.

Flame Traumas

Providing specialist legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Hospital Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal representation for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Fault

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal guidance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Stumble Incidents

Skilled in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents secure equitable recompense for wounds and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Accident

Ensuring adept legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Dedicated to offering professional legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and adept legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Expert in defending individuals with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440