...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mound City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Looking for exceptional legal service regarding dog bite injuries in Mound City? Consider the eminent Carlson Bier attorney group. With a distinguished history of successfully representing victims of dog bite injuries, our commitment to justice and client satisfaction sets us apart. Our expertise lies in assessing each case from an individual standpoint, accounting for the uniqueness involved to better serve you. We fully understand applicable laws and regulations concerning dog bite injury cases across Illinois, enabling us to navigate these often-complex scenarios with proficiency and ease. We firmly believe that no one should bear unjust burdens due to others’ negligence or misconduct involving canines. Therefore, we are driven by the desire to help secure necessary compensation for medical bills, emotional distress, lost wages or potential disfigurement incurred as a result of dog attacks. Trusting Carlson Bier underlines choosing comprehensive support throughout your journey towards recovery – legally and psychologically – because here at Carlson Bier we don’t just care about winning; rather it’s about making sure justice is served every time!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mound City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your welfare after enduring a personal injury is our absolute priority. As leading personal injury lawyers based in Illinois, we bring an exceptional depth of knowledge and experience to assist individuals who have experienced dog bite injuries. Understanding the nuances of these cases aids immensely in providing you with fair representation in your litigation needs.

Dog biting incidents can lead to serious physical and psychological trauma. Approximately 4.5 million people fall victim to such instances every year across the United States, revealing the importance of awareness and legal assistance related to this subject. These injuries can vary from minor puncture wounds or abrasions to more substantial harm that requires surgical treatment; each one capable of creating long-lasting effects on your health as well as potential financial burdens.

* Dog bites may result in severe injuries like fractures, disfigurement, and neurological damages.

* The risk factor for infections post-dog bite is high due to bacteria present in dogs’ mouths.

* Long-term consequences include emotional distress, fear-related conditions and even Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Here at Carlson Bier, we have specialized attorneys proficient in personal injury laws which pertain specifically to dog bites, solidifying our commitment towards guaranteeing just compensation for victims. Our firm believes not only in representing clients but also enriching their understanding of their legal rights after suffering such traumatic experiences.

Accordingly:

*We ensure that clients comprehend Illinois’s state-specific statutory laws concerning liability over dog bites; primarily ordinance 510 ILCS 5/16 stating owner responsibility unless provocation can be proven.

*With our expert guidance on reporting requirements following a dog bite incident locally – communication with authoritative bodies becomes hassle-free.

The aftermath of a dog bite does not merely end at physical impairment or emotional tremors—it often extends into realms like medical costs for treatments or lost wages during recovery periods—all weighty impacts warranting remuneration. We believe impactful attorney services encompass comprehensive solutions touching on each aspect of your traumatic experience.

* Carlson Bier ensures your medical expenses will be taken into account; everything from emergency services to therapy treatments.

* We also believe you should not bear the financial burden of lost income during this tumultuous period, considering it in our representation for fair compensation.

* Finally, we address emotional damages associated with such distressing encounters—providing thorough legal advice and fighting vigorously for rightful mental anguish compensation.

Don’t face these trying times alone; allow us at Carlson Bauer to support and guide you through every step towards successfully claiming deserving compensation. Our meticulous understanding of Illinois state laws pertaining to personal injury ensures optimal prospects for clients seeking justice after enduring a dog bite incident.

Our promise is our commitment—to protect your rights fervently, provide expert advice tirelessly, and proceed meticulously with prosecution if negligence or owner liability can be identified. We are driven by an unwavering desire to deliver justice for all victims suffering due to animal attack injuries—a reflection of our stature as one of Illinois’ leading personal injury attorneys specializing in dog bite incidents.

At Carlson Bier, we value transparency highly—for it stands as an integral part of our robust client-lawyer relationship model. Thereby, with us by your side, every aspect will be clarified—from probable outcomes and remuneration possibilities – based on thorough case evaluations leaving no stone unturned.

To embark on the road to reclaiming what’s rightfully yours after a harrowing chain of events following a dog bite injury—capitalize on the expertise and comprehensive assistance that Carlson Bier has to offer. Click on the button below now – find out precisely how much your case could potentially amount in terms of rightful compensation warranted by the duress inflicted upon you via a traumatic incident involving a canine creature. Trust us—the strength acquired from professional legal backing can make even uphill journeys more conquerable than first perceived; begin your journey today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mound City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mound City

Areas of Practice in Mound City

Bike Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing skilled legal support for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing expert legal help to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Slip Accidents

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Neonatal Harms

Supplying legal assistance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding patients of car accidents secure fair payout for damages and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Crash

Providing professional legal assistance for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Building Collisions

Focused on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Committed to delivering professional legal support for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Focused on advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer