...

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Mound City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a pedestrian accident, obtaining reliable and expert legal representation is paramount, and Carlson Bier represents that standard in Illinois. Pedestrian-related incidents require acute understanding of law intricacies unique to this context; something we excel at. Our team of experienced attorneys specializes in pedestrian accidents, navigating the terrain with precision informed by comprehensive knowledge and accumulated expertise.

Victims face an array of challenges following an accident – from coping with injuries to confronting medical bill expenses. That’s where we step in. At Carlson Bier, your need becomes our cause as we fight for maximum compensation you deserve while ensuring fairness.

Our reputation is marked by a record proven through countless successful cases won on behalf of injured pedestrians; representing our devotion towards championing our clients’ rights within all limits set by Illinois laws.

Choosing us translates into choosing undivided attention to detail combined with unwavering commitment — values necessary for challenging negotiations often accompanying such claims process. Remember, when seeking assistance after a pedestrian collision – think Carlson Bier: committed representation dedicated to achieving justice for those crippled by unfortunate accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Mound City Illinois

Carlson Bier Associates Ltd., a reputable Illinois-based personal injury law firm, prides itself in protecting the rights and interests of pedestrians who have fallen victim to traffic accidents. With an unprecedented level of legal expertise, we are committed to helping you understand your rights and how best to pursue your claims if you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident.

Pedestrian accidents occur as a result of varying situations ranging from distracted or reckless driving to non-compliance with traffic rules. The aftermath can often lead to severe physical injuries, emotional trauma or even death. Our dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier are specialists in assessing these cases strategically and carefully presenting them for compensation claims.

There are key factors to consider when evaluating pedestrian accident claims:

• Liability: It is crucial to determine who is at fault. This could be the driver of the vehicle or other external parties like municipal authorities responsible for maintaining safe roads.

• Impact Severity: The extent of injury determines the claim value. More serious injuries like brain damage or spinal cord injuries may attract higher compensation compared to minor bruises or scrapes.

• Medical Expenses: All expenses incurred on medical treatment post-accident can substantially influence the claim amount.

• Lost Wages: Any loss in earning capacity as a result of the accident should be factored into your compensation demand.

We want you to know that undertaking such legal pursuits without expert counsel might lead to under-compensation or no compensation at all due to complicated procedures and manipulative tactics from insurance companies designed exclusively to limit their liabilities. At Carlson Bier, we will fight relentlessly on your behalf while treating each case uniquely as it deserves—ensuring maximum possible recovery.

Moreover, our services go beyond simply offering legal support; understanding that such accidents may leave victims feeling emotionally overwhelmed and physically stressed, we take measures not simply based on professional obligation but also driven by an intrinsic commitment towards empathy and personal connection. Our overall goal includes making sure you receive deserved care and medical attention while we handle all legal processes that ensue.

In our experience, we have seen how important immediate action is following the unfortunate incident of a pedestrian accident. We strongly recommend hiring an experienced attorney at your earliest convenience who can advise on crucial steps like evidence collection, identifying witnesses, engaging experts for review, among others.

We value transparency and ensuring potential clients understand what they stand to gain from their lawsuit. Carlson Bier attorneys strive to familiarize you with the process so that there are no unexpected surprises along the way. Remember, every case possesses a unique set of elements which means generalized assumptions about compensation cannot suffice when determining an accurate claim worth.

Finally, it’s important for you to know what your case may potentially be worth—a figure not simply conjured up but calculated based on variables such as degree of injury, level of liability, incurred expense and lost income among other factors.

Let us help ease this burden. Don’t let worry over legal complexities continue to be a source of stress when professional assistance is within reach. To find out how much your case is worth or if you need any more information concerning pedestrian accidents—please click on the button below and we will attend promptly to your inquiries. As partners in justice—we ensure steadfast advocacy from start to finish.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mound City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Mound City

Areas of Practice in Mound City

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Offering expert legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Extending specialist legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal help to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Fall Incidents

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents gain fair compensation for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing expert legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Worksite Crashes

Dedicated to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to assisting patients with spine impairments, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer