Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Mound City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When considering legal representation for Slip and Fall Accidents in Mound City, prospective clients should turn to the proven track record of Carlson Bier. Our firm combines deep industry knowledge with a strong commitment, ensuring that your needs are met with exceptional service. Recognized as a leading personal injury lawyer group specializing in Slip and Fall Accidents, we understand how important it is to advocate strongly yet compassionately during challenging times. Our experienced team at Carlson Bier works relentlessly on your behalf to navigate through complex regulations and procedures – all aimed at securing the best possible outcome for you. Rooted deeply within Illinois’s legal environment, our credibility is second-to-none when dealing with intricate nuances of Slip And Fall Accident claims. At Carlson Bier, we believe every client deserves tailored advice specific to their unique circumstance backed by professional support every step of the way—together; let’s fight for what matters most! Trusting us means getting not just mere assistance but dedicated partnership throughout this journey towards justice.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Mound City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we extend our legal expertise to those individuals who have fallen victim to the oftentimes debilitating circumstances of slip and fall accidents. With a steadfast commitment to justice, our Illinois-based firm champion’s our client’s rights with unwavering perseverance. Operating in the complex landscape of personal injury law, it is crucial that those affected understand the intricacies surrounding Slip and Fall Accidents.

It is common knowledge that each accident holds its nuances, but what elevates their unpredictability is how they transpire right under our noses – at work, at local businesses or even simply during a casual stroll on public sidewalks. These occurrences are not only unexpected but can precipitate drastic consequences such as physical harm and steep medical costs.

Key factors contributing to this kind of an unsettling ordeal include:

– Poorly lit pathways

– Wet or icy surfaces

– Unmaintained roads or floors

– The absence of warning signs where necessary

Primarily, determining liability plays a pivotal role in any slip and fall cases. It solely rests on proving negligence by showing either ‘constructive’ or ‘actual’ knowledge on part of the premises’ owner. In circumstances wherein there was reason for them to know about the possible hazardous situation but did nothing about it constitutes constructive while actual denotes direct proof showcasing their awareness.

For victims grappling with these unfortunate situations, financial recovery becomes essential. Whether it’s lost wages due to missing work from sustained injuries or other incidental expenses related out-of-pocket; fair compensation remains paramount for mitigating losses resulting from someone else’s carelessness.

But aren’t all injuries deemed identical? A pertinent question asked by many clients warrants addressing here: unintentional accidents like slip and falls qualify as ‘personal injury’, making them distinct because negligence must be demonstrable affirmatively. This gravitates away from assumptions based merely on postulations lacking concrete evidence.

In accordance with Illinois law, recovering appropriate damages also depends upon establishing comparative negligence which directly affects how liability gets apportioned amongst all parties involved. Significantly, claimants must share no more than 50% blame for their accident to avail compensation.

Often unexpected, incidences of slip and fall can leave victims with the uneasy task of navigating hectic legal procedures during a frail period in their lives. This is where Carlson Bier steps in. As stalwarts within this field, we shoulder the weighty responsibility of actualizing your claims through conscientious legal representation while you concentrate on recovery.

Our skilled team relentlessly pursues rightful reparations by meticulously dissecting each case thus leaving no room for lax interpretations. Be it revealing safety code violations or uncovering instances that signal maintenance negligence; our overriding objective always remains providing undisputed counsel to those wronged by others’ imprudence implicitly or explicitly.

However one-dimensional any situation might appear at face value, several aspects warrant introspection in ascertaining if a slip and fall case is actionable or not. Leaning on these fundamentals coupled with leveraging collective experiences aids us in safeguarding our clients’ interests rigorously.

As you continue gathering your bearings after such an unfortunate incident, let us be the source of supportive legal aid interpreting these intricate scenarios deftly.

Ready to explore your options? We invite you to click on the button below and uncover what your case is worth. Trust Carlson Bier fostering your journey towards achieving justice efficiently – because you deserve nothing less.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mound City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Mound City

Areas of Practice in Mound City

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Damages

Supplying skilled legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering expert legal support for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal assistance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Tumble Accidents

Skilled in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Expert in providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Semi Mishap

Delivering specialist legal services for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Construction Mishaps

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Impairments

Committed to providing specialized legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Passing

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal services to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer