Medical Malpractice Attorney in Mount Auburn

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the complex realm of Medical Malpractice law, you need to bank on trusted expertise. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in, offering unparalleled legal services and representation. Based in Illinois and renowned for our profound understanding of the intricate medical-legal landscape, we stand as a preferred choice for those seeking justice within Mount Auburn. We are adept at deciphering complex medical documents pertinent to your case: from misdiagnosis or failings in treatment protocols to pharmacy errors— no detail is overlooked when building solid ground for your defense. Respected for our meticulous approach and tenacity, we have a record punctuated by significant settlements procured on behalf of our clients across various cities including Mount Auburn after experiencing healthcare negligence. Choose fortitude; choose efficiency; choose excellence: with Carlson Bier as your chosen representative in these trying times – one who doesn’t sit idle till justice is served regardless of how formidable an opponent might be – rest assured that you’ve made an astute choice tailored towards seeking vindication against any type of negligent medical practice.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Mount Auburn Illinois

The esteemed law firm Carlson Bier is revered for its competence and dedication in handling an array of personal injury claims, with a central focus on Medical Malpractice. Based out of Illinois, we have successfully advocated for several clients through meticulous understanding and execution of state laws. As premier Personal Injury Attorneys, our foremost aim is to empower our clients and general readership with rigorous knowledge surrounding the grievously misunderstood segment of Medical Malpractice.

Medical malpractice refers to situations where healthcare professionals deliver treatment that diverges from standardized practices resulting in harm or discomfort to patients. These deviations can range from diagnostic errors, surgical complications, improper medication dosages to neglecting patient history. Understandably, navigating the legalese surrounding medical malpractice litigation can be daunting; this underscored by two-fold complexities – grasping technical jargon amalgamated with emotional stress pertaining health implications.

However, comprehending some key aspects can make it far less intimidating:

• Proof of Existence of Doctor-Patient Relationship: It should be clearly demonstrable that you hired a physician and it was their responsibility to treat you.

• Carelessness in Treatment: It has to be proven that the doctor was negligent concerning diagnosis or treatment.

• Harm Caused By Negligence: The doctor’s negligence resulted into damage- physical pain, mental suffering, additional medical expenses or loss of work/earning.

• Statute of Limitations: In Illinois specifically, legal action usually must commence within 2 years from when you became cognizant about your injury and never exceeding 4 years post-treatment date.

Trusting in someone like Carlson Bier who possesses stark familiarity with these defining nuances ranks strongly towards proper representation against entities such as large insurance companies. While there are no guaranteed outcomes in any lawsuit; having experienced legal counsel maximizes the probability for favorable rulings making a significant difference regarding financial compensation aftermaths.

Medical malpractice cases generally pursue compensations entitled ‘damages’. These involve Real Damages – cost of medical bills and lost wages. While, General damages refer to compensation for pain, indignity or any other non-monetary adversity. Punitive Damages are sought when practitioner’s actions were intentional/deliberately reckless putting patient’s life at stake.

This expansive insight aids prospective clients in discovery and understanding the pertinency of their case basis. Carlson Bier believes that every person deserves justice; especially those who become victims of dubious healthcare practices deteriorating their quality of living. Having represented numerous clients across Illinois in such cases over the years: recovery from negligence-induced suffering invigorates with our adept diligence.

We consistently boost your chances by strategizing deeply personalized representation plans converging with needs and interests at focal point. Guiding through each step, complex terms get simplified while intimidating processes transform into interactions comprehended easily by anyone irrespective background familiarity be it legal aspects or associated medical complexities.

Ultimately, keeping in mind the massive human element centered in each case, we relentlessly strive towards an outcome empathetic to your scenario which lends itself to forthcoming resolution rather than merely masking existing problems steering beyond mere instances but ensuring sustained relief.

Aggregating all these facets perceives clear image about Carlson Bier as preferred partners during challenging times stricken by unethical malpractice ensnared abused trust implicated overcoming grave health related concerns midst alleviating desolate pains combating against colossal parties via profound legal prowess.

As your reliable guide through turbulent journeys upheaved by Medical Malpractice occurrences, we encourage you to delve deeper into understanding what your case can really mean for you. Click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth responding intuitively timely action curtails sequential dilemmas enhancing fairness embedded accountability promoting elevated justice embracing restorative peace-of-mind primary prerogative reclaiming deserved respectability culminating ultimate victory dignifying overall resilience powerfully steady transformation building brighter futures together now becoming within possible reach indeed.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Auburn Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Mount Auburn

Areas of Practice in Mount Auburn

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending professional legal advice for patients of severe burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending expert legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, delivering skilled legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Stumble Mishaps

Adept in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Delivering legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on guiding individuals of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Truck Mishap

Offering professional legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Expert in delivering compassionate legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered harms from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in defending persons with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer