FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mount Carmel

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury is a challenging episode that requires unparalleled expertise to litigate – something Carlson Bier proudly provides. Our potent proficiency in dealing with spinal cord injuries cases enables us to better understand your pain, empathize with your situation, and strategize for the best outcome possible. The sympathetic yet dynamic approach of our lawyers really distinguishes us within the realm of personal injury law practice. At Carlson Bier, we walk you through every step, ensuring no stone is left unturned; from accumulating substantial evidence to taking care of intricate paperwork procedures. Simultaneously holding those accountable who cause such life-altering damage by their negligent actions drives our commitment to safeguarding justice for victims of spinal cord injuries in Mount Carmel area reconnects them with brighter possibilities ahead. No matter how hard your journey may appear right now remember: you are never alone when represented by Carlson Bier – all aspects are expertly considered and handled here unlike elsewhere.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mount Carmel Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we bring a depth of expertise in helping victims understand and fight for their rights when it comes to personal injury cases, particularly those involving spinal cord injuries. Spinal cord injuries are serious traumas that could lead to paralysis or severe physical disabilities. These injuries require complex medical care and extended rehabilitation periods which can be financially overwhelming.

Educating yourself about spinal cord injuries is intrinsic in understanding their life-altering consequences. They primarily occur due to traumatic events like road accidents, falls or sports-related incidents which damage the vertebrae, ligaments, or disks of the spinal column. The impact can interfere with nerve signals below the injury site leading to loss of mobility and sensitivity—a condition called paralysis.

• Complete Paralysis: Also known as tetraplegia/quadriplegia affects both limbs and torso.

• Partial Paralysis: This type, referred to as paraplegia affects only part of your body.

Remember, there’s undeniable weight on insightful knowledge about these injuries—their causes, symptoms and potential treatments are elements not just vital but invaluable when maneuvering through such trying times.

The unfortunate fact remains that often these injuries are borne out of negligence from another party—a reckless driver in an automobile accident for instance. Carlson Bier stands firm on its goal; ensuring you receive substantial compensation if your injury was the result of someone else’s fault becomes our priority number one.

However, what enhances this challenge is comprehending Illinois’ Comparative Fault Law—an intimidating piece under legislation but fortunately at Carlson Bier; we’re committed not just to ensure you navigate this code smoothly but that justice stays paramount throughout this journey. Under comparative fault law:

• If an accident victim shares less than 50% of fault they may recover damages.

• No recovery if they share more than 50% fault

It implies even if partially responsible for an accident resulting in a spinal cord injury—accountability will still adequately be taken into account to the proportionate degree of fault you played in such a tragic series of occurrences.

But how exactly is the value of your case determined?

Several components are considered, which include:

• Medical Bills: All hospital and rehabilitation-related costs associated with treating spinal cord injuries.

• Pain and Suffering: Extensive physical pain and emotional distress caused by the injury. It’s worth noting pain and suffering losses are complicated to quantify or prove but we at Carlson Bier help ensure maximum possible recovery.

• Loss of earning Capacity: Considering any reduction in your ability to work as a result of this injury.

By leveraging our vast experience dealing with personal injury cases involving spinal cord injuries; we’re entirely dedicated to ensuring law keeps working for victims like yourself—upholding rights, promoting justice for parties injured out of negligent acts, getting proper compensation—the essence is put that Illinois laws keep serving you right throughout this ordeal.

We hear you loud and clear when it’s about radical shifts involved adjusting life post- such an incident—in truth, understanding these legal concerns can bring along uncertainties more often than not; still rest assured that having Carlson Bier representing you means capable hands leading your battle against legal ambiguities.

Take one step closer towards reclaiming control over your life today; determine how much your case could be worth in a fight for rightful compensation! We invite you to click on the button below now — let’s maneuver through knowing more about possibilities ahead together genuinely standing up against negligence causing harm far extraordinary beyond belief.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Carmel Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mount Carmel

Areas of Practice in Mount Carmel

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Burns

Providing expert legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering professional legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal guidance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Trip Occurrences

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal aid for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Focused on supporting victims of car accidents secure fair payout for harms and losses.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Crash

Extending expert legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for harms.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Committed to extending dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure redress.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in representing individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​