FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mount Greenwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to comprehensive and efficacious representation for dog bite injuries, look no further than Carlson Bier. Renowned in Mount Greenwood for their vigorous pursuit of fairness and justice, our well-equipped team understands the nuances embedded within Illinois personal injury law concerning dog bite accidents. Suffering a dog bite can be traumatizing and painful; we are here to stand by your side providing competent legal aid every step of the way. Our steadfast dedication ensures you get due restitution while our rigorous approach minimizes chances of being overwhelmed by legal complexities. With adeptness in handling intricate cases, clients who sought out Carlson Bier saw victories that materialized into substantial compensation funds reflecting medical costs and emotional distress associated with such incidents. Thus making us not just an option but rather the idyllic choice when looking for transformative resolutions surrounding unfortunate encounters with aggressive dogs in Mount Greenwood’s vicinity or anywhere across Illinois where you might need laudable advocacy on your side. Partner with Carlson Bier—securing justice is what we do best!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mount Greenwood Illinois

If you or a loved one has suffered from a dog bite injury, there are legal considerations that can help protect your rights and ensure that you are adequately compensated. Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, based conveniently in Illinois, believe in the importance of educating clients and readers about their rights under personal injury law.

Dog bites can lead to serious physical harm such as deep lacerations, puncture wounds, crush injuries, nerve damage or even fractures. In some cases, they may also expose victims to ailments like Rabies or Tetanus. Beyond the physical trauma, victims often suffer emotional distress post an attack. This further underscores the need for effective legal representation when dealing with dog bite incidents.

The state of Illinois adheres to strict liability laws relating to dog bites. Detailed within Section 16 of the Animal Control Act:

– The owner is liable if their dog attacks without provocation

– The victim was legally allowed to be at the location where the attack happened

– The victim must not have provoked the dog

This essentially means that as long as you didn’t provoke the animal and were either on public property or legally on private property when attacked, you have grounds for a claim against the pet owner.

There are several aspects involved while filing for compensation related to dog bite injuries which include not just medical expenses but also compensation for pain & suffering and wages lost during recovery. Alice Schroeder once quoted – “Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing.” At Carlton Bier Personal Injury Attorneys we aim to eliminate this risk by providing expert advice every step of way.

Further it’s essential understanding that regardless how friendly and well-trained a dog might be– certain unexpected situations might still provoke aggressive behavior leaving behind substantial evidence supporting validity of claims made by victims.

At Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys we thoroughly understand all aspects of Illinois Dog Bite Law and will strive relentlessly helping unravel complexities surrounding these unsettling occasions-prudently guiding through subtleties of the legal process- ensuring your rights are diligently protected, and you receive just compensation to which you’re entitled.

Lastly, we advise swift action in instances of dog bites. The Statute of Limitations sates that a lawsuit must be filed within 2 years from date when cause-of-action accrued protruding need for timely investigation gathering crucial evidence.

As personal injury experts firmly based within Illinois state lines, we’ve spent decades scrutinizing myriad regulations that apply precisely to cases like yours– safeguarding interests of victims diligently or assisting them navigate intricate aftermaths resulting due heart-rending dog-related incidents.

Remember each case is unique with variables affecting potential outcome including severity, level of negligence displayed by owner and lasting impact injury has had on your life.

It’s not always easy discerning details right after traumatic incident but seasoned counsel can greatly assist alleviating worries while they carefully stitch together most persuasive case possible.

Wisdom suggests seeking experienced representation following any dog bite incident – having knowledgeable advocate significantly impacts final resolution – as they ensure all factors considered-bolstering chances secure fair settlement needed assuaging distress caused by such an unfortunate event.

And at Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys our litigators exude amicable resilience making us go-to resource for those seeking justice in realms where underdogs persevere! Click the button below today determining what your personal injury claim may actually be worth. We look forward to serving you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Greenwood Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mount Greenwood

Areas of Practice in Mount Greenwood

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Supplying professional legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Offering specialist legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending professional legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Abuse

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Fall Injuries

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal help for families affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to guiding patients of car accidents secure reasonable recompense for damages and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Collision

Delivering professional legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Focused on delivering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in handling cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal support to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440