Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mount Greenwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a spinal cord injury can be devastating, confusing, and often feels insurmountable. However, you need not feel alone in this journey. With Carlson Bier handling your case, suffering from such catastrophic injuries doesn’t mean you’ll bear all burdens alone. Specializing in personal injury cases like spinal cord damage, we bring vast experience to our work across Illinois. Our dedicated team ensures clients receive full justice for their pain and loss.

We understand that every spine ailment varies hugely; one person’s impairment is noticeably different from another’s. Therefore every client’s unique situation receives personalized care at Carlson Bier – tailored strategies designed to achieve prompt settlement or trial success are our forte.

Why choose us? Because expertise matters! Navigating the perplexing interplay of medical bills coverage through health insurance policies while dealing with intricate liability issues requires professional acumen – an assurance with Carlson Bier courtesy decades’ worth experience precisely in these critical arenas.

Remember – swift action following a spinal cord injury could significantly impact claim outcome favorability! So don’t delay – consultation awaits at trusted champions for Spinal Cord Injuries’ justice – The Law Firm of Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mount Greenwood Illinois

Carlson Bier, a premier personal injury law firm based in Illinois, has been at the frontiers of legal advocacy for victims of spinal cord injuries. Spinal cord injuries, unfortunately, are often life-altering events with lasting repercussions that stretch far beyond immediate harm.

The spine is essentially the body’s main communications highway, transmitting signals from the brain to various parts of your body. Any damage inflicted on this critical component can have severe and lasting implications which can significantly alter one’s life. As victims navigate through recovery or adaptation processes, they inevitably confront an array of physical , financial and emotional challenges that encompass medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of income and more.

• Physical Challenges: Loss of mobility varying from partial paralysis (Paraplegia), mostly restricted to lower limbs; to complete paralysis (Quadriplegia), affecting all limbs are some potential outcomes after a spinal cord injury.

• Emotional Toll: Frustration over loss of independence coupled with anxiety about future undertakings can introduce serious mental health issues like depression amongst survivors.

• Financial Repercussions: High cost involved in diagnosis, surgeries, rehabilitative therapies along with other associated expenses due to altered lifestyle needs could impose significant monetary burdens.

With specialists boasting years of expertise in advocating for spinal cord injury victims’ rights and entitlements in Illinois. The Carlson Bier Group entrusts that you truly understand the profound impact these injuries may imply on your life–which goes well beyond just recovering from physical trauma. We assist clients seeking compensation covering their medical bills incurred but also striving towards regaining control over their lives amidst such overwhelming circumstances.

Navigating lawsuits revolving around spinal cord injuries could be tedious given its complexities yet it becomes prominent when pursuing fair thrashing against negligent parties responsible for causing harm. These cases typically involve thorough analysis fundamentally involving three crucial aspects:

• Understanding The Injury: Determining exact extent and timing plays pivotal role here.

• Identifying Responsibility: It becomes vital to assemble irrefutable evidence often involving detailed investigations.

• Calculating Compensation: This involves comprehensive evaluation of all possible costs incurred, loss of earnings together with future earning capacity.

Our firm employs a team-disciplined approach that takes into account the scientific and medical elements involved in such cases fused justly with legality. Our commitment has continually been to offer the best service by preparing meticulously for each case as if it would be going to trial, negotiating aggressively on your behalf when circumstances call for it.

At Carlson Bier, we are passionate about making this challenging phase bearable for you while also pursuing justice relentlessly. We distinctly understand every case and story is unique–we honor this uniqueness by offering personalized legal services finely tuned towards achieving desired goals.

Irrespective of where exactly in Illinois you are located, our stalwart dedication to ensure fair representation remains unwavered. We believe equipping clients with information empowers them – makes them instrumental partners in their fight against injustice rather than being mere spectators in an otherwise convoluted process of personal injury litigation.

Ultimately, we want you––the injured party––to focus primarily on recovery while we shoulder your burden concerning the myriad adversarial legal confrontations looming ahead. Harnessing our expertise borne out of years tackling spinal cord injury cases across Illinois should put your fears aside; leave it to us—we’ve got your back!

Should you wish further guidance or keen on understanding what lies ahead better? Explore more via ‘Know Your Case Value’, as per Illinois law pertaining personal injury litigations by simply clicking on the button below. Break shackles imposed unwittingly due negligence from others! Assert rightful claims exploring compensation possibilities today itself!

(VALUE YOUR CASE BUTTON)

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Greenwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mount Greenwood

Areas of Practice in Mount Greenwood

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Damages

Providing expert legal help for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Offering expert legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Delivering legal aid for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents get equitable remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering experienced legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Neurological Damages

Specializing in offering dedicated legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Harm

Specializing in advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering professional legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer