Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mount Morris

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When living with spinal cord injuries, the emotional and financial strain can be overwhelming. For residents of Mount Morris seeking legal counsel for these debilitating circumstances, Carlson Bier is an excellent choice trusted by many. As a prestigious law firm based in Illinois, our specialty lies in providing unmatched support to those who have undergone such life-altering experiences. We comprise an adept group of attorneys skilled in championing cases involving spinal cord injuries that meet the rigorous standards set forth by Illinois legislation. With a reputable track record solidified over years of practice, we excel at securing fair compensation aiming towards alleviating medical costs and fostering holistic recovery paths for our clients. Our dedication shines not just through successful case outcomes but also compassionate understanding and empathy; acknowledging each client’s unique situation ensures personalized tactics fitting their needs seamlessly. Rest assured knowing that entrusting your case to Carlson Bier means leveraging zealous advocacy coupled with unrivaled expertise—always paving way toward justice served rightfully.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mount Morris Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our passion is being the leading choice for anyone in Illinois needing a personal injury attorney. We’ve dedicated ourselves to providing detailed, comprehensive legal services that are tailor fit for clients who have experienced unfortunate events leading to spinal cord injuries. Your health and wellbeing are paramount; as such, we believe it’s crucial you understand what spinal cord injury entails.

Spinal cord injuries can result from various factors, with most cases arising due to traumatic incidents like car crashes or fall accidents. Depending on the magnitude of damage inflicted on the spine, consequences will vary from slight changes in motor functionality to complete paralysis—either temporary or permanent.

Let’s explain some crucial points related to spinal cord injuries:

• There are two types: complete—in which all sense of mobility and feeling get lost beneath the site of trauma—and incomplete—the extent of resulting disability largely depending on damaged areas.

• The level at which your spinal cords got injured significantly determines the effect on mobility because lower parts control leg movements while higher parts control arm movements.

• It isn’t just bodily functions affected by these injuries; patients often suffer mentally, struggling with emotional stress and depression.

• Beyond just immediate healthcare expenses involved post-accident, other hefty costs might surface regarding rehabilitation treatment or supportive aids required for navigating daily life—making this class of accidental harm indeed life-altering.

Understanding the medical implications alone can be daunting—often too complex for those without a specialized medical background. Fortunately, in addition to representing you legally post-accident/injury incidents involving Spinal Cord Injuries at Carlson Bier, we offer insightful advice, equipping clients with necessary knowledge about their predicaments through thoroughly researched content conveyed comprehensibly—an attribute that has earned us respect across Illinois as an empathetic law firm offering more than just legal protection.

Fr om our experience dealing with diverse Spinal Cord Injury cases across Illinois (minus Mount Morris), there’s no one-size-fits-all blueprint in handling such lawsuits. The negligence standard varies based on individual conditions, emphasizing precisely why you need a knowledgeable attorney on your side—familiar with local court processes’ peculiarities; keen to unravel complex medical language and capable of convincingly building compelling arguments squarely favoring our client’s best interest.

Hiring an expert personal injury lawyer from Carlson Bier offers an invaluable safeguard during these trying times. Our commitment is anchoring your cause firmly grounded on truth and fueled by detailed evidence gathered meticulously, ensuring no facet gets ignored or overlooked—ultimately delivering the unwavering legal representation deserving only for best positioned successes.

We fully understand that attempting to decipher intricate legal terminologies while grappling with injuries can be overwhelming. Thanks to our well-versed attorneys who strive to maintain clear communication lines at all times, we patiently guide clients through every step of their claims process. This way, clients find it easy understanding diverse aspects related to their lawsuits; thus gaining empowerment for making informed decisions.

Legal battles involving Spinal Cord Injuries can long-drawn-out affairs consuming loads of time and resources; but not when you hire Carlson Bier’s astute personal injury attorneys who remain unmatched for skillfully navigating these complex waters swiftly steering cases toward favorable resolutions then consequently rewarding claim settlements.

Should you now feel compelled exploring opportunities awaiting out there regarding potential claim compensation following an unfortunate incident causing spinal cord damage, don’t hesitate seeking assistance from Carlson Bier—one law firm in Illinois renowned for stellar reputation rescuing countless individuals emerging stronger post-adversity.

Eager discovering what value your case presents? We invite clicking the button below to engage free consultation establishing how much potentially lies in store once we embark working together battling towards common victory vested solely within reestablishing control over your life post-tragedy.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Morris Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mount Morris

Areas of Practice in Mount Morris

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving adept legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Clinical Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal services for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Aged Mistreatment

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Supplying legal support for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents gain reasonable payout for damages and harm.

Scooter Incidents

Focused on providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Crash

Extending professional legal services for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Head Impairments

Committed to offering compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal services to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Expert in assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer