...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mount Prospect

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When contending with the aftermath of a dog bite injury in Mount Prospect, it is crucial to have expert legal representation, which is where Carlson Bier comes into play. Our leading attorney group specializes in personal injury cases involving dog bites and ensures victims receive rightful compensation for pain, trauma, medical expenses, and lost income. Dog bite cases can be complex; however, our vast understanding of Illinois legislation enables us to skillfully navigate these complexities while standing by your side every step of the way. For proven advice on important decisions such as when to settle or go to trial over a biting incident’s circumstances and ensuing injuries suffered – rely on Carlson Bier experience & expertise! Our meticulous approach includes detailed investigations that present you in your strongest light against insurers or responsible third parties. Choosing Carlson Bier for your dog bite claim signifies choosing dedicated support committed solely towards securing an outcome favoring you—the victim—while minimizing stress throughout the process.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mount Prospect Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in handling personal injury cases such as dog bite injuries. We understand the physical and emotional trauma that can result from aggression by an innocent-looking, but unpredictably harmful pet dog; it is why we dedicate our expert legal services to individuals who have suffered due to such unfortunate incidents.

Dog bites can lead to severe injuries like lacerations, puncture wounds, broken bones, nerve damage, and also psychological stress. These may sometimes lead to unforeseen fallout such as:

• Potential for heavy medical expenses

• Extended recovery periods

• The likelihood of missed workdays leading to income loss

• Possible long-term physical disfigurement or impairment

In Illinois specifically, statutes hold dog owners strictly liable for any harm caused by their pets regardless if they were aware of the inherent aggressive nature of the animal beforehand. This means that victims of dog bites are eligible to seek compensation for damages sustained including medical bills, lost wages from time off work due to injury recovery, pain and suffering endured both physically and psychologically.

As experienced attorneys based out of Illinois with a strong focus on personal injury law and more specifically – dog bite cases – our team at Carlson Bier approaches every case with diligence. Our extensive knowledge in this specialized area ensures a comprehensive understanding of various nuances integral in claiming rightful compensations for affected individuals.

Vital elements when embarking on a claim could include:

• Documenting details surrounding the incident

• Medical records indicating extent of injuries

• Evidence implicating owner negligence or failure in controlling their pet

• Details pertaining to any previous aggressiveness shown by said animal

Our dedicated lawyers will prudently compile these essentials building your case securely while navigating intricate legal procedures effectively steering you towards equitable results. Simply put – at Carlson Bier we champion your rights ensuring justice is duly served!

Possessing an appetite that only victory or rightful settlements elicit helps us offer clients unyielding dedication. Coupled with our painstaking approach to minute details and consistent updates, we ensure that you are not just another case file but a valued client deserving the best possible legal representation.

As serious as dog bite incidents may be, they needn’t overshadow your life perpetually. Our promise at Carlson Bier is to assist you in confronting these challenging circumstances head-on while arming you with an inclusive understanding surrounding all aspects of your claim – enabling you to make informed decisions about your case.

At Carlson Bier, we’re more than just personal injury attorneys – we are seasoned advocates who stand by our clients throughout their complex journey from hardships to rightful reparations and peace of mind.

We encourage you now to begin on this path towards justice reaffirming your rights – click the button below for an initial consultation absolutely free of charge. Together let’s find out how much your case might potentially be worth! Trust in us to demystify complicated legal proceedings so that only clarity prevails empowering you to cope impeccably within this trying junction of life.

So go ahead – take that first step today…because every stride towards justice counts! With Carlson Bier by your side rest assured; You Are Not Alone!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Prospect Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mount Prospect

Areas of Practice in Mount Prospect

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering skilled legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Providing experienced legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Slip Incidents

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents receive fair settlement for harms and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Collision

Offering experienced legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in delivering compassionate legal representation for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure redress.

Backbone Injury

Dedicated to supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer