...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mount Prospect

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For those grappling with the aftermath of spinal cord injuries in Mount Prospect, Carlson Bier exudes a beacon of respite and resolution. Our unrivaled expertise within this specific realm distinguishes us as an optimal partner for victims navigating these nuanced legal challenges. At Carlson Bier, we comprehend that such mishaps can shatter lives while causing physical discomfort and financial hardship. We staunchly believe you deserve justice, compensation for medical bills, loss of earnings, pain, suffering and more; thus we fight fiercely to secure your entitled damages.

Possessing comprehensive knowledge about Illinois Spinal Cord Injury law coupled with a robust track record renders our firm as the preeminent choice when seeking competent counsel in such complex litigation processes. Acknowledging every case’s uniqueness underpins our approach – meticulously analyzing each facet to devise effective strategies.

In essence: Choose Carlson Bier to ensure unsurpassed advocacy dedicated towards restoring normalcy after devastating spinal cord traumas…voice your rights – let us be your chosen champions handling all legal aspects seamlessly whilst keeping your emotional equity intact throughout the process.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mount Prospect Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that a traumatic event like a spinal cord injury can leave you and your family with many questions about your rights and opportunities for justice. Our commitment is educating our clients every step of the way while pursuing maximum compensation for their injuries. When it comes to spinal cord injuries, let us illuminate aspects you need to bear in mind:

• First, it’s essential to understand what Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) entail. SCIs often result from severe trauma such as vehicle accidents or falls where the spine is jolted or severed. As these are typically unexpected incidents, they carry not only physical pain but emotional distress.

• Second, the projected costs of living with SCI are colossal: Initial hospitalization alone could range between $140k – $480k depending on severity; annual expenses vary from $19k – 185k. It’s important take this into account when exploring compensation options.

• Finally, remember that even though Illinois assumes a modified comparative negligence system – meaning if you’re more than 50% responsible for an accident causing your SCI, you cannot recover damages – each case is unique and several factors will influence its outcome.

Navigating through law terminology without legal expertise can be daunting. Countless factors determine justifiable compensation in personal injury cases: current and future medical bills related to the SCI treatments like surgery and rehabilitation; lost wages from time off work during recovery phase; anguish due to reduced quality of life or ongoing pain; spousal deprivation results from loss of companionship; resilience pertaining to any potential suffering endured by loved ones witnessing the incident and resulting difficulties.

Here at Carlson Bier we pride ourselves in our ability to proficiently tread these complexities while maintaining transparency with our clients throughout the process. Our experienced team prioritizes client well-being alongside offering unrivaled professional guidance: ensuring immediate medical care gets arranged post-incident before tackling insurance claims head-on; subsequently streamlining litigation proceedings while managing settlements negotiations as dedicated custodians of your case, we’ll fight alongside you till the end.

Moreover, our commitment extends past legal advice – we are passionate about informing and helping those in need understand their predicament better. Familiarizing oneself with SCI’s after-effects like nerve pain, muscle spasms, loss of feeling or motor control and potential complications such as respiratory problems could assist you in discussions with healthcare providers to devise an effective care plan.

Recovery from a personal injury that involves SCI is a long journey, often peppered with several unexpected turns. At Carlson Bier, we aim to lessen your burden by providing the best possible legal support tailored to your specific needs and ensuring that you receive rightful compensation for your ordeal. You don’t have to navigate the complexities of spinal cord injuries alone; our trusted team can be right there with you through each stage of your case – fighting fiercely for justice on your behalf.

The true value and worthiness of a spinal cord injury claim may be difficult to ascertain without expert guidance. Please note that only dutiful investigations into numerous factors can determine fair adjudication. So hesitate no more – speak up against injustice today: shoulder some weight off by allowing us at Carlson Bier help lead on tackling legal hurdles that lie ahead!

Are you curious about how much compensation might be deployable on conclusion? Wondering what possible recompense can aid in traversing these tough times? It’s perfectly normal – remember one vital fact: it isn’t just about money garnered post-trial but rather attaining closure which sets precedence assuring others stand less risk facing similar injustices tomorrow! Provoke change today – delve deeper beneath those lingering doubts fortified through fear blocking progression towards prosperity reserved rightfully for victims like yourself! Click on the button below – let’s begin this journey together finding out what YOUR unique case potentially holds worth-wise…

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Prospect Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mount Prospect

Areas of Practice in Mount Prospect

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Giving professional legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Negligence

Offering specialist legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, offering skilled legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Fall Injuries

Expert in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for harms and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Extending expert legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Building Accidents

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in supporting clients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​