FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mount Pulaski

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one is suffering from dog bite injuries in Mount Pulaski, Carlson Bier Attorneys at Law deserve your consideration. With extensive expertise handling personal injury cases specifically related to dog bites, our skilled team will ensure the strategic management of your case. We understand the traumatic and potentially life-changing consequences that can arise from such unfortunate incidents. Our pursuit for justice goes beyond mere settlement; we aim to procure compensation that fully accommodates medical bills, rehabilitation costs, psychological trauma and lost wages. When it comes to navigating regulations in Illinois concerning liability for dog bite incidents, professionalism is paramount –our experience speaks volumes about our aptitude here as well. Rest assured that whether it’s negotiating with insurance companies or representing you in courts when needed – we prioritize your best interests throughout the process. Choose Carlson Bier Attorneys for dedicated legal representation tailored to serving Mount Pulaski clients dealing with Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mount Pulaski Illinois

In the realm of personal injuries, dog bite injuries are often underestimated but can result in severe physical and emotional distress. At Carlson Bier, your personal injury attorney group based out of Illinois, we strive to provide substantial educational content to ease understanding and contribute value to every reader.

Dog bites can inflict extensive harm, with effects ranging from cuts and wounds to more serious complications like infections or diseases transmitted through the animal’s saliva. While these direct physical challenges are grave in their own right, one must not overlook the hidden mental trauma that may follow a traumatic event such as this. The potential lasting fear of dogs or even day-to-day anxiety is an unseen setback gradually eroding quality of life for victims, making it one of the profound consequences linked with dog bite injuries.

It’s paramount to know that Illinois observes strict liability when handling dog bite cases. Essentially this means that proving negligence on part of the pet owner isn’t necessary; they stand liable if their dog/animal causes any damage sans provocation while off its property or outside its enclosure.

There exist specific points worth noting about Illinois’ statutes on dog bite:

• Victim didn’t provoke/manhandle the animal.

• Victim was legally present at location during occurrence.

• Statute of limitations: Dog bite claims lie within 2 years from incident date.

Your right to fair compensation doesn’t only encompass medical expenses; pain and suffering can also be included under non-economic damages – yet another noteworthy aspect found within the periphery of Personal Injury Law involving animla attacks.Your attorney will utilize case facts along with evidence collected (documented details stated by eyewitnesses)to advocate for comprehensive compensation based on each factor impacted by your experience—physical well-being, psychological health and lifestyle changes due to ongoing emotional turmoil caused by a negligent act which could have been prevented otherwise.

Ensuring you secure maximum entitlement involves pursuing a legal course under guidance from trained professionals skilled at navigating intricate frameworks scaffolding Personal Injury Claims. The seasoned team at our law firm, Carlson Bier, works diligently through case details to provide strong representation in your pursuit of justice and rightful compensation.

Our dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier specialize in personal injury cases, with specific emphasis on dog bite injuries. We pride ourselves in providing comprehensive services to our clients ‑ from a detailed analysis of the case to robust representation in court; all backed by trust forged over time through extensive client-counselor interaction. Our primary goal is ensuring you get what’s rightfully yours.

Irrespective of injury extent or circumstances surrounding your case, we’re committed to fighting for fairness and will work relentlessly to guide you along each step while fostering complete transparency throughout the legal journey. Trusting us with representing your claim means receiving personalized attention, access to resources necessary for moving forward, keeping you informed about every development related directly/indirectly with your incident or its aftermath.

It’s imperative that proper measures are taken after encountering any such incidence involving potential harm due to another’s negligence – immediate medical care allied with simultaneous reporting the event should be prioritized before focusing towards pursuing your damage claim.

Before exploring any further,and before making a crucial decision concerning your future well-being – it might help uncovering something valuable: What is my Dog Bite Case worth?

If this thought reverberates within your mind then look no further – simply click the button below! Allow us at Carlson Bier- Your Personal Injury Attorneys serving Illinois-, assist in determining an estimated value based upon crucial factors affecting eventual payout such as degree of injuries sustained,future prognosis,pain/suffering endured-and make an informed decision about proceeding legally post this unfortunate turn of events.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Pulaski Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mount Pulaski

Areas of Practice in Mount Pulaski

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Wounds

Supplying specialist legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering experienced legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, providing professional legal assistance to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Incidents

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to aiding patients of car accidents gain fair compensation for hurts and losses.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring adept legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to offering compassionate legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Injury

Expert in assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​