Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Mount Pulaski

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a spinal cord injury, navigating the path to justice can be complex. This critical juncture calls for expert assistance from an experienced law firm that comprehends the intricacies of personal injury law related to such injuries. It is here that Carlson Bier comes into play, having championed countless cases successfully – we’re seasoned in dealing with spinal cord injuries lawsuits and their nuanced legal implications. Attentive focus on each case combined with dedication equips us adequately to advocate fiercely for your rights and compensation you deserve. Our extensive knowledge about medical details associated with spinal cord injuries fuels our ability to build compelling cases backed by solid evidence for Mount Pulaski citizens seeking justice. Leveraging years of experience handling sensitive cases, compassion partnered with aggressive representation embodies Carlson Bier’s approach towards every client’s fight for recovery benefits they rightfully deserve after a catastrophic accident resulting in a spine injury.Don’t let mere distance deter your pursuit of justice as we uphold our commitment to serve wherever needed.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Mount Pulaski Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a renowned personal injury law firm based in the state of Illinois, we’re committed to providing our clients with an informative and comprehensive understanding of all aspects related to their cases. Our specialized team has cultivated extensive experience in tackling difficult lawsuits involving spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries can potentially devastate lives in the blink of an eye. At times brought on by sudden trauma, these mishaps might leave victims grappling with life-altering circumstances such as paralysis or severely impaired mobility. The potential for pain, suffering, emotional distress and financial hardships are enormous. Yet it’s crucial for any victim of such distressing circumstances to understand that they have rights – rights that our law office at Carlson Bier is adamant about upholding and protecting.

Our attorneys take great pride in keeping themselves apprised and educated on all aspects concerning spinal cord injuries, ensuring not only a thorough grasp over your case particulars but also guiding you through a smooth litigation process. Here are some pivotal points that shape our approach:

– A spinal cord injury isn’t merely physical damage; its repercussions invariably spill into psychological and financial territories as well.

– There exist several categories within spinal cord harm including complete injuries (where no function is retained below the level of injury) and incomplete ones (some function remains beneath injure site).

– Depending upon how adverse an individual’s condition is post-injury; immediate emergency care, subsequent hospitalization cost plus the ongoing medical expenses may keep surfacing indefinitely.

These facts underscore the gravity of seeking rightful compensation to largely alleviate the pronounced burden from an aggrieved party’s shoulders.

Here at Carlson Bier, our strong drive toward helping those falling prey to unanticipated accidents runs deep throughout our organizational ethos. We deploy strategic legal maneuvers tailored intricately around each unique claim’s contours which subsequently intensifies chances for a favorable outcome.

We comprehend that no amount of money can truly compensate for someone’s lost physical health or peace of mind. But holding responsible parties accountable, legally and financially, can pave the path toward a smoother healing journey whilst simultaneously serving justice.

Our cordial professional interaction never compromises transparency as we take painstaking efforts to explain all relevant terms, processes, potential pros-and-cons in easily relatable terms for our clients. We invariably maintain this level of patient communication to remove any unnecessary stress or confusion.

Given that each spinal cord injury case presents its own unique challenges and complexities, it is recommended not to navigate litigation waters by yourself when dealing with stakes so high. Having our skilled attorneys on your side promises an informed legal voyage towards seeking rightful recompense.

As champions of law and quintessentially human empathetic values alike, at Carlson Bier we strive relentlessly on behalf of our esteemed clientele to restore balance in their lives post such unsettling occurrences.

In light of these insights offered regarding spinal cord injuries guidelines you are advised to probe further into knowing your place within the legal scenario if you have unfortunately been injured by someone’s negligence or intentional actions.

Fixedly situated only in Illinois(not Mount Pulaski) where our genuine presence offers trusted reliable legal counsel; we employ our vast knowledge pool accumulated over years quite judiciously implying robus execution for every case taken up without promising the moon!.

To really understand what value might be added considering your individual circumstances or simply to explore more about how Carlson Bier can assist effectively feel free invitingly click on the button below. Our proprietary assessment tool will provide a solid estimation around the financial ballpark that your case may potentially find itself landing squarely in!

So why wait? Initiate taking back control now with Carlson Bier’s adept personal injury lawyers firmly backing you up! Trust us when we say – You’re worth it!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Pulaski Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Mount Pulaski

Areas of Practice in Mount Pulaski

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving expert legal help for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing expert legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving dangerous products, delivering specialist legal services to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Slip Incidents

Professional in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their losses.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Crashes: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Semi Accident

Ensuring adept legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Traumas

Expert in providing expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in advocating for patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer