Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Mount Sterling

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re reeling from a pedestrian accident, what you need is unwavering legal support paired with extensive experience in the field. That’s precisely what Carlson Bier delivers, an eminent law firm that thrives on providing representation to those who’ve been affected by pedestrian accidents. Our attorneys exhibit unparalleled prowess and dedication in their craft, helping clients navigate each procedure with ease and ensuring they receive top-notch care during these troubling times within Mount Sterling. Our ingenuity has allowed us to consistently deliver when it comes to amplifying your voice against insurance giants whose only intention might be minimizing your compensation claim’s worth or denying it altogether. Not only do we maintain our professionalism at all times, but we assure empathy abounds each journey reflecting thoughtfulness throughout the process as well; remember our paramount concern is for YOUR wellbeing! By relying on Carlson Bier for representation following a pedestrian accident within Mount Sterling area, expect unprecedented service guided by relentless pursuit of justice – making us one clear choice endearing trust of clients alike .

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Mount Sterling Illinois

Carlson Bier is an established Illinois law firm committed to defending the rights of those who suffered injuries as pedestrians. With extensive experience and a deep understanding of personal injury laws, our seasoned professionals are more than ready to handle the most complex pedestrian accident claims on your behalf.

We understand that each incident presents unique circumstances, hence we extend personalized legal representation adapted for every client’s distinct need. Being involved in a pedestrian accident can inflict major disruption in one’s life, leading to exorbitant medical bills and unexpected loss of income due to severe physical impairment. It may prove overwhelming for anyone not familiar with Illinois’ intricate law system which is why you need Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys at your side.

Pedestrian accidents occur from numerous causes such as reckless driving, distracted drivers or failure to yield the right-of-way at crosswalks. Regardless of how or where they happen, these accidents tend to result in serious harm or even wrongful death since pedestrians lack the protection awarded by automobile frames. Fortunately, individuals harmed under these conditions are entitled to compensation if their calamity resulted from negligence.

When dealing damages calculations post an injury claim victory, several key factors are taken into consideration:

– Immediate medical expense: This entails cost covering initial hospitalization after being hit by an auto.

– Ongoing & future medical costs: A reflection on rehabilitation therapy or additional surgeries that stretch over time.

– Loss of Income: Suffering injuries hinders work ability resulting in lost wages.

– Emotional distress: Psychological trauma linked with sustaining grave injuries.

At Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, we make it our business persuading juries and insurance companies about degree damage caused through validated experts in assorted fields providing credible testimonies alike valuation experts analyzing lost income capacity or healthcare provider explaining future treatment requirements including its financial implication towards full recovery.

Our team maintains diligent prosecution ensuring all responsible parties held accountable thereby recovering rightful compensations owed victims as per Illinois personal injury law. Regardless of the aggressive insurance firms you’re dealing with or convoluted incident details; Carlson Bier provides enlightened legal representation through every lawsuit phase, inclusively conducting meticulous investigations to gather necessary evidence.

Throughout this journey, communication is essential. We do not just provide top-tier legal counsel but also support and frequent updates concerning case progressions adhering to transparent professional ethics ensuring clients understand every claim’s direction.

Finally, remember this: At Carlson Bier, we work on a contingency basis implying that unless we secure compensation for you, our services come at no cost. You have nothing to lose by pursuing what’s rightfully yours because your success transpires into ours which solidifies us as Illinois’ number one choice when it comes down to pedestrian accident claims.

Are you ready to take control and regain your life back after such an unfortunate event? It starts today with stepping forward against those who did harm against you. Do not be burdened alone but instead allow professionals knowledgeable in pedestrian-related accidents guide you towards restoring justice so that healing can begin firsthand without a worry about bills pile-up or severe financial strain post-accident.

In conclusion, strict adherence to the provision of personalised care linked with steadfast fighting spirits towards recovering rightful compensations per client testifies unmistakably why Carlson Bier serves as ideal representation for anyone seeking amends post their dirty run-in over Illinois’ pavements.

Take a moment now by clicking the button below for your free case evaluation. Let Carlson Bier ascertain what your case could potentially be worth as we lend hand working through your pursuit of obtaining deserved restitution within Illinois’ boundary lines while respecting all state laws regarding firm locality representations

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Sterling Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Mount Sterling

Areas of Practice in Mount Sterling

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying expert legal help for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering professional legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Tumble Injuries

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal support for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Crashes

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents obtain equitable recompense for hurts and damages.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal services for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Mishap

Delivering specialist legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for harms.

Building Accidents

Dedicated to defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Focused on offering professional legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and adept legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer