...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mount Vernon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite incident can be daunting. Carlson Bier has dedicated attorneys with deft expertise in handling Dog Bite Injuries cases. We understand the intricacies and nuances involved, serving our valued clients not as generic personal injury lawyers but as specialized representatives for victims dealing with canine-related injuries. Our seasoned team provides unparalleled counsel to ensure you receive rightful compensation while prioritizing your immediate healing and long-term recovery. As esteemed legal professionals committed to justice within Illinois, we’ve earned an unrivaled reputation in passionately advocating for dog bite victims’ rights, delivering persuasive case presentations that lead towards substantial settlements or favorable verdicts at trial when necessary.

Choosing Carlson Bier means putting trust into proven proficiency where rising victorious is more than just a possibility—it is an expectation forged from consistent implementation of superior strategies aimed at achieving fair resolutions without compromise on what matters most: restoring normalcy following such traumatic experiences.

Trust us; we’re relentlessly dedicated to securing your just recompense right here in Illinois—an unwavering constant throughout any maelstrom brought about by unfortunate Dog Bite Injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mount Vernon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to protecting the rights of victims who have suffered from Dog Bite Injuries in Illinois. As an experienced personal injury law firm, we understand that dog bite injuries can be very traumatic and can lead to severe physical harm as well as emotional distress. We recognize every person’s right to seek rightful compensation for these incidents.

Dog bite injuries range from minor scrapes or lacerations to serious wounds, fractures or even fatal damage in severe cases. It is realistic to encounter both physical and psychological difficulties after such an event; problems such as scarring, fear of dogs (also known as cynophobia), sleep disturbance and post-traumatic stress disorder aren’t unusual.

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs each year in the USA alone, with one out of five necessitating medical attention.

– The CDC also highlights that children account for more than half of all dog bite victims.

– Dog owners frequently bear liability for their pets’ actions under “strict liability” laws.

– It’s crucial to gather detailed information about the incident like photos of your injuries, details about where and when it happened plus info on witnesses if any exist.

Proving negligence can often play a significant role in personal injury claims arising from dog bites. Some common examples include violating leash laws or ignoring previously aggressive behavior exhibited by the pet in question. Gathering compelling evidence demonstrating owner negligence makes a substantial difference towards securing favorable settlements.

With rapport established over years within our practice areas across many Illinois communities – while firmly adhering to local advertising laws – earned us recognition throughout these locales without necessity of having physical offices within every city borders.

The team at Carlson Bier combines skillful legal acumen with vigorous advocacy on behalf of our clients who have endured suffering due to unanticipated dog attacks. We support you throughout your legal journey by ensuring all necessary steps are taken to present a strong and convincing case.

Legal frameworks surrounding dog bite injuries vary across different states. Illinois operates under the ‘Animal Control Act’, which holds dog owners strictly liable for injuries caused by their pets, even if the owner was not necessarily negligent or knew about the dog’s violent tendency. We at Carlson Bier are well-versed in these specific legalities and will tirelessly campaign for your rights within this established statute.

Remember no matter the circumstances around your injury, immediate medical assistance should always be sought after following a dog attack. Doing so does not only ensure that you receive necessary care but also helps demonstrate a duty of care towards yourself – an important aspect when pursuing compensation claims.

There is value in capitalizing on time: begin your process promptly to preserve crucial evidence, witness testimony and ensure overall that no statutory damages limitations overshadow possibilities for full claim recovery. We have experts on hand who can help gather such key pieces of documentation alongside investigating circumstances surrounding incident occurrence giving us edge during negotiations or trial if need arises.

The situation immediately following a dog bite injury can be overwhelming; however, please remember that you do not have to face it alone. Our team at Carlson Bier is here provide support every step along way ensuring all legal options explored towards maximizing potential compensation outcome all while keeping you informed regarding developments.

After enduring pain and trauma of unforeseen endangerment, gaining some measure control over ensuing steps might look like daunting task – navigating through complex legal labyrinth isn’t something anyone should take up single-handedly. Therefore we strongly encourage claiming what might already rightfully belong to you by clicking button below find out just how much your case could really be worth! With hardworking team whose dedication equals magnitude depth knowledge has mastered intricacies personal injury law Ø/ve got nothing loose – only everything gain!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Vernon Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mount Vernon

Areas of Practice in Mount Vernon

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing adept legal support for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring specialist legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal aid for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents receive just compensation for harms and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring professional legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to extending dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to defending persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer