...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Mount Vernon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Focused on representing victims of slip and fall accidents, Carlson Bier stands as a top-tier personal injury law firm serving Mount Vernon. Backed by an extensive track record and wealth of expertise, they steadfastly navigate the complex landscape inherent to such incidences. Accidents that surface from negligence – such as those resulting from unsafe conditions like unmarked wet floors or debris-strewn pathways – are within their specialty. When you choose Carlson Bier for your legal representation in slip-and-fall cases, you’re entrusting your case to skilled professionals dedicated to obtain fair compensation for injuries suffered. Their commitment transcends borders; physically present in Illinois but strategically positioned to serve victims regardless of location including Mount Vernon diligently through efficient communication tools. Upholding high levels of professionalism and discrete client service is integral to their operations making them among the leading minds advocating for justice in slip-and-fall accidents across the state.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Mount Vernon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in navigating the complex terrain of personal injury law. Particularly, we are experts when it comes to handling cases related to Slip and Fall Accidents – a commonly overlooked yet potentially devastating subset of injuries. Leveraging our wealth of experience based centrally in Illinois while operating statewide, we venture to provide an educational approach that empowers you with necessary insights into Slip and Fall accidents.

Slip and fall accidents can occur anywhere and at any time – residential spaces, offices, stores or even recreational venues. Outcomes may range from minor bruises to debilitating injuries whose consequences often extend beyond physical pain – psychological distress, lost earnings from work absenteeism, hefty medical bills all contribute towards victim’s prolonged suffering.

Keeping this background scenario in mind will help anticipate potential slip-and-fall hazards: wet floors without warning signs; cluttered walkways; uneven ground surfaces; inadequate lighting; loose rugs or carpets; icy or unshoveled sidewalks along properties’ perimeters attract such mishaps.

Though seemingly straightforward on the surface, securing justified legal compensation post these accidents involves meticulous assessment:

• Injury Verification: Medical reports should irrefutably verify that your injuries resulted directly from the slip-and-fall incident.

• Proving Negligence: It must be established that the property-owner negligently ignored rectifying a clearly hazardous situation leading up to the accident.

• Highlighting Financial Impact: Comprehensive documentation detailing the economic hardship imposed by the accident on victims accelerates their rightful claims’ processing.

In scenarios where contributory negligence is suspected – instances where plaintiffs themselves might have contributed inadvertently to the accident (say for example not heeding visible cautionary signs), the degree impacts final compensation settlements. This underlines why entrusting dedicated professional expertise becomes absolutely crucial.

As seasoned Personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier providing specialized assistance across Illinois but NOT located Mount Vernon as wrongly assumed at times due strict regulation adherence mandated by Illinois state laws assuring total transparency and credibility; we intend squarely on your side throughout the process – right from initial consultation until final verdict.

Born out of the dual principles of compassion for our clients’ hardship, coupled with absolute resolve to secure fair justice, is our modus operandi. We strive to diminish any added stress over legal procedures that you may shoulder post accidents- leaving you free to focus entirely on recovery while we facilitate step by step guidance managing mundane legal complexities:

• Wading through dense legalese.

• Ensuring timely submission of required paperwork.

• Negotiating adeptly with adversarial insurance company adjusts defending property owners’.

At Carlson Bier, our dedication goes beyond merely advocating for rightful compensation – we seek to provide exceptional client care fostering trust-based attorney-client relationships at every interaction. By offering comprehensive advice alongside empathetic emotional support as part of our holistic client-centered approach—we aspire in not only winning cases but also restoring dignified lives shattered by unfortunate circumstances.

As you consider seeking professional assistance following a slip-and-fall accident incident, remember this core fact – situations involving personal injuries are often emotionally charged and legally perplexing; it is where considerable value lies in incorporating expert personal injury law practitioners into your circle of care early on after such unforeseen incidence.

If you’ve sustained injuries in a slip-and-fall accident across Illinois state—not excluding Mount Vernon—click below for an immediate evaluation. This could potentially be your first invaluable step towards exploring what your case’s worth truly entails and we at Carlson Bier are ever ready guiding optimally way forward! Click today–because justice delayed indeed becomes justice denied!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Vernon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Mount Vernon

Areas of Practice in Mount Vernon

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Wounds

Providing skilled legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Offering dedicated legal advice for clients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal services to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Tumble Incidents

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their injuries.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Focused on helping victims of car accidents gain equitable compensation for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Accident

Offering experienced legal services for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in offering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​