...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Moweaqua

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the impact of a bicycle accident, you need an advocate who understands your situation and has a proven track record. In step Carlson Bier, renowned Illinois-based personal injury attorneys specializing in bicycle accidents litigation. Our firm boasts highly skilled lawyers, intimately familiar with the complexities that such cases often entail. We transcend geographical boundaries to deftly navigate through intricate laws and regulations related to bike crashes. With our excellent strategic problem-solving skills combined with aggressive negotiation tactics we strive for effective resolution balancing compassion and vigour.

Our experience has repeatedly demonstrated the profound physical, emotional, and monetary toll invariably linked with bike collisions while identifying long-term ramifications often overlooked by insurance companies’ objective calculations.In these instances,you deserve compensation fully reflecting every dimension of your disruption.That’s where Carlson Bier leverage their expertise: ensuring justice is served from speedy resolution to fair settlements.So should you unfortunately find yourself tangled up in Moweaqua’s unexpected cycling chaos or rash-driving breakout,stress no more – choose Carlson Bier-cycling justice champions.Your peace of mind starts today!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Moweaqua Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your guardian angels in personal injury law, we prioritize the rights of victims who have suffered due to bicycle accidents in Illinois. Through a combination of our seasoned experience and undeniable commitment, we assure you fair pursuit for compensation as you navigate the numerous challenges tied to such unfortunate incidents.

As an avenue to shed light on Bicycle Accidents, understanding this niche area in personal injury law is critical. Bicycle accidents often result from several factors ranging from driver negligence, hazardous road conditions or flaws in the bike’s design itself. Although a healthy and eco-friendly mode of transport, bicycling does not come without risks. When these risks culminate into tragic incidents

• Driver Negligence: Insignificant as it may seem to some, respecting cyclists’ rights on public roads remains neglected by many drivers. At times, drivers fail to yield to cyclists at intersections or stay paranoid about sharing the road with them – both leading to severe injuries or even fatalities.

• Questionable Road Conditions: Poor street lighting, abrupt potholes or irregular signage can create unsafe circumstances for cyclists regularly traversing these routes.

• Design Defects or Failure: Lackluster manufacturing processes might lead to unsafe bicycles hitting stores that later translate into disastrous accidents for innocent bikers.

Personal Injury law helps safeguard your interests if you’re trapped into any of these circumstances due to no fault of yours. As esteemed specialists in this field since our inception, we commit ourselves entirely towards representing clients who’ve unjustifiably borne physical damage and emotional distress following a bicycle-related setback.

Every victim’s case holds unique intricacies guided by diverse grounds constituting negligence or heedlessness—considerations crucial towards comprehending liability and estimating potential compensation. While laws governing bicycle safety emerge tangled for most civilians not acquainted with legal jargon – here at Carlson Bier navigates through perplexities seamlessly – dedicating every minute detailing each fragment within your case while shedding clarity on murky areas one might struggle with otherwise.

As Illinois State Law underlines, a cyclist has identical road rights similar to any other motorist (625 ILCS 5/11-1502). Simultaneously, the state follows the protocol of modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1107.1) wherein if your share in the accident does not surpass 50% – you remain eligible for compensation. Proficient in deciphering such complex legislations – we commence by examining eyewitness accounts, studying police records and taking into account medical proof pertaining to injuries that confirms extended damages.

Illinois law restricts us from stating our presence in any city unless we hold a physical office there, but rest assured that regardless of geography, Carlson Bier stands staunchly by its mission – delivering uncompromised legal assistance focused on defending victims against unjust bicycle accidents.

When it comes down to money matters — here at Carlson Bier our efforts are comprehensive and steadfast; we meticulously pound each detail connected with assessing previous expensive medical bills, potential future treatments or wages lost customizing solutions exclusive for every client. Safety lies at cycling’s core; when this safety has been compromised resulting negatively impacting one’s life significantly— we believe firmly that those affected merit exact justice through adequate monetary reimbursement.

To this end, recognition, research and rightful claim while faced with such tragedies can be demanding and draining; hence having professional allies like us ensures proper representation for your case and affords much-needed peace of mind. If you’re still wondering how much your case would be worth or what steps should be taken next— fret no more! Click on the button below so that we could assist you towards understanding better how each penny counts within personal injury cases related to bicycle accidents. With Carlson Bier standing shoulder-to-shoulder offering unwavering support during difficult times—you never walk alone.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Moweaqua Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Moweaqua

Areas of Practice in Moweaqua

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering specialist legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending expert legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Incidents: Devoted to aiding victims of car accidents obtain just compensation for injuries and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Mishap

Providing expert legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Committed to offering dedicated legal representation for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and experienced legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Specializing in representing patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​