...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Moweaqua

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with dog bite injuries in Moweaqua, seeking legal representation from Carlson Bier’s adept personal injury attorneys is a prudent decision. With their extensive experience in managing cases related to canine aggression incidents, they are equipped to zealously advocate your rights while chartering the complex waters of Illinois law. Their reputation for pursuing full and fair compensation reflects an unwavering commitment to justice. Whether you need assistance navigating insurance claims or seek redress in court due to misfortune caused by negligent pet owners, rest assured that the team at Carlson Bier has your back. They understand the physical pain and emotional trauma these incidents induce and strive diligently towards attaining justice swiftly yet effectively. Provided indispensably with your best interests at heart – they deliver discernibly personalized service that transcends mere legal counsel into a beacon of solace and support during testing times such as these.Repose trust where it matters most; choose Carlson Bier for top-notch dog bite injuries representation.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Moweaqua Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the serious physical and emotional trauma that a dog bite injury can cause. As leading personal injury attorneys in Illinois, we believe it’s crucial to comprehend the complexities of these cases to offer our clients superior representation. Dog bite injuries can result in severe mutilation, significant medical bills, lost wages from missed employment opportunities, not to mention the psychological aftermath. Dealing with such a traumatic experience alone can be overwhelming; hence, our commitment – providing legal support through your healing journey while seeking rightful compensation for you.

Dog bite laws across different states may vary; however in Illinois, under the principle of “strict liability,” pet owners are held completely liable for any damages their dogs may cause. This means even if the owner wasn’t negligent or didn’t know that his/her dog was possibly dangerous, they are still responsible for their pet’s attack. Understanding this principle is paramount for anyone involved in a dog-bite case.

Here are some key points about Illinois’ strict liability rule:

• The law applies only when a person is conducting themselves peaceably; meaning an individual who provokes a dog into attacking will not receive protection.

• There must be actual damages caused by the dog’s actions

• The victim does not need to prove negligence on part of owner

To ensure maximum recovery after experiencing such an event, here’s what action you should take immediately following a dog bite:

– Document everything: Write down all specifics regarding circumstances surrounding incident

– Take photographs: Visually document wounds before and after treatment

– Seek medical help immediately: Animal bites pose considerable risk of infection

– Report incident: Contact local animal control department

The statute limits at two years from date of accident exists within which lawsuit needs to be filed against offending party according to Illinois law. In other words, any delay beyond this timeframe could potentially lose right over pursuing compensation claim legally.

It’s important however to remember every situation varies in terms of complexity and compensation amount. Numerous factors such as future medical care required, extent of the physical injury, psychological trauma suffered, loss of earnings incurred due to the incident together will impact your claim’s value. This is why Carlson Bier’s dedicated expertise comes pivotal assisting you seamlessly navigate complex legal landscape while ensuring rightful justice served.

At Carlson Bier, we bring a combination of dedication and understanding that defines our approach to dog bite cases. We work tirelessly with healthcare providers, investigators, and other specialists whenever necessary to build strong cases for our clients. Our reputation confirms our commitment – securing millions in settlements and jury verdicts on behalf of dog bite victims.

Ultimately, understanding how much your case might be worth involves taking into account numerous factors specific to your situation. To do this requires not just knowledge but deep experience drawn from handling similar cases – which is exactly what we at Carlson Bier offer. If you or a loved one are grappling with a dog bite injury, take the first step towards getting the justice you deserve today by clicking on the button below for a comprehensive case review. Working together, we can achieve more than mere compensation; we can help provide closure as you embark on reclaiming your life after a traumatic incident like this.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Moweaqua Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Moweaqua

Areas of Practice in Moweaqua

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving skilled legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering professional legal services for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Accidents: Devoted to aiding victims of car accidents get reasonable recompense for hurts and damages.

Scooter Collisions

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing professional legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Head Injuries

Specializing in delivering specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Passing

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in representing persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​