FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Murrayville

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Have you or a loved one suffered from a bicycle accident in Murrayville? Expert representation can make the difference. Choose Carlson Bier, recognized leaders in Bicycle Accident Law and personal injury claims. Our exceptional team navigates complex Illinois law with ease, providing meticulous attention to detail while fighting tirelessly for our clients’ rights. With an impressive track record of successful resolutions, we stand at your side until justice is served. At Carlson Bier, every case is treated personally; no individual is just another number to us. We strive for the best outcome possible as we understand that each situation leaves individuals and families irrevocably changed by their trauma on bike rides along roads of Illinois – especially in our beloved Murrayville community – which underscores why it’s essential to retain a well-versed advocate like us during these tumultuous times! Partnering with Carlson Bier ensures unsurpassed mastery over Bicycle Accidents cases – absolute guidance when you need it most! Contact our legal champions today! Trust Carlson Bier—Your pathway through adversity!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Murrayville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the myriad of challenges bicycle accident victims face in Illinois. The debilitating injuries and mounting medical costs can become overwhelming. As leading Personal Injury Attorneys, our main objective is to provide comprehensive legal services that minimize your stress and maximize your compensation.

Bicycle accidents can stem from a variety of circumstances such as driver distraction or negligence, dangerous road conditions, faulty bicycle components, and ambiguous traffic rules regarding cyclist rights among others. After a bicycle accident in Illinois, it’s important for cyclists to know their rights under state law.

Illinois statutes firmly outline bicyclists’ right to share the road with motor vehicles. Under the ‘same rights and duties’ stipulation present in most state laws – including Illinois’s Bicycle Rules of the Road statute – drivers are mandated to treat bicycles as they would other vehicles on the road.

Nonetheless, notwithstanding these protective laws, countless bicyclists suffer serious harm due to negligent motorists every year. Common injuries include fractures, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), spinal cord damage, internal organ damage along with severe skin abrasions known colloquially as ‘road rash.’

In light of these facts, you may find yourself asking what recourse is available after a bicycle accident? Interestingly multiple damages may be claimed following such incidents which could significantly alleviate some financial pressure:

• Reimbursement for all relevant medical expenses.

• Restitution for anticipated future healthcare costs attributed directly to sustained injuries.

• Compensation for pain endured along with any emotional distresses.

• A contribution towards lost wages

• Loss of earning capacity

When dealing with insurance claims post-accident there are several key factors that ought to be considered:

• Understand that an initial received offer might not reflect one’s total losses legitimately claimable.

• Evidence preservation including photographic documentation and witness statements are crucial pieces that support one’s case.

• The limitation window within which one needs to submit their claim is a critical factor worth considering – in Illinois, it’s typically within two years of the accident.

• An experienced personal injury attorney can evaluate your circumstances accurately ensuring maximum compensation covering all current and potential future losses.

Indeed, at Carlson Bier we’ve committed ourselves to assisting victims of unfortunate bicycle accidents navigate these particularly complex legal waters. Leveraging our deep-seated understanding of both bicycling laws as well as other deciphering nuances unifying motor traffic regulations and cyclists rights, we promise dedicated representation for our clients aiming at procuring rightful compensation from those accountable.

However, while providing such invaluable guidance and relief from financial burdens arising out of unfortunate incidents remains paramount to us; prevention still takes precedence. Thus, we encourage all riders to invest ample time reviewing safety precautions, biking guidelines along with state biking laws before hitting the road.

Crucially remember immediate legal counsel upon being involved in any sort of bicycle accident aids significantly in consolidating a robust case which could potentially guarantee you utmost financial recuperation. In this aspect engaging an adept advocate who comprehends intimately how insurance companies operate coupled with an expansive network that facilitates authentic medical diagnostics is vital. We pride ourselves on being exactly that!

If you or a loved one have been affected by a bicycle accident do not hesitate – reach out today! Our personal injury attorneys are waiting at no obligation to discuss your unique situation assessing any entitlements owed under Illinois law. Together we’ll build an action plan meticulously designed around your specific needs fighting tirelessly thereby championing your cause every step of the way.

Why leave yourself exposed guessing how much compensation you rightfully deserve? Let us bring clarity – just click on the button below to find out what your case might be worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Murrayville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Murrayville

Areas of Practice in Murrayville

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Supplying adept legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal assistance for patients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Tumble Accidents

Expert in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Incidents

Collisions: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents obtain fair settlement for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Incident

Ensuring experienced legal support for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to providing specialized legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Committed to assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440