Personal Injury Attorney in Murrayville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a personal injury in Murrayville, securing the help of an adept legal advocate is essential. This is where Carlson Bier thrives as a premier choice for astute legal guidance and representation. Renowned across Illinois state lines, our attorneys are well versed in all facets of Personal Injury law, making us an exceptional ally to rectify your case with precision. Committed to championing victim’s rights and diligent pursuit for justice, the team at Carlson Bier utilizes their comprehensive expertise to meticulously prepare each case and deliver intelligent advice that reassures our clients’. Our reputation for tenacity sets us apart; we don’t merely strive forward towards claims settlements – we ensure every client emerges victorious amidst their ordeal. Proficient negotiations combined with assertive litigation techniques signify why countless individuals have trusted their cases in our capable hands.You may not find comfort in knowing you aren’t alone while undergoing such adversities but having Carlson Bier beside you could be your best consideration during this time.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Murrayville Illinois

Navigating through the rough seas of personal injury law can be a daunting experience; whether you’re bogged down by an automobile accident, tripped on unattended hazards or suffering from medical malpractice. In such complex circumstances, Carlson Bier stands strongly at your side as your trusted personal injury attorneys in Illinois. Our reputable law firm tailors our expertise to champion your legal rights and secure optimal outcomes for your personal injuries.

The realm of personal injury covers a vast spectrum of incidents where individuals have been harmed due to others’ negligence or intentional misconduct. This umbrella term encapsulates various scenarios such as auto accidents, slip and falls, product liability, wrongful death, and more. The gravity of these types of incidences often results in severe physical pain or enduring psychological distress which can impose fundamental changes on one’s life trajectory.

It is crucial for injured parties to understand that under Illinois law, they may seek monetary compensation for the losses borne due to these traumatic events. Often it is not just about recuperating physically but also compensating punitive damages for loss of income potentiality during periods healing and expensive medical bills that quickly sum up.

Empowering yourself with knowledge paves the path towards swift recovery:

• Personal Injury: Not always visible, sometimes psychological trauma or emotional distress incurred by an incident counts.

• Statute limitations: In Illinois, the general timeframe for filing a personal injury claim typically spans two years from the date when you sustained or became aware of your injuries.

• Liability: Determining who holds responsibility is pivotal as it impacts how much compensation is owed.

• Damages Cap: In specific cases like Medical Malpractice there are caps set upon non-economic awarded damages.

Frequently overlooked is the importance of expedient action post-incident. Evidence collection (images/ video), witnesses’ details securing and realizing down timelines could be instrumental in constructing robust evidence based argumentation. Secondly enlisting skillful legal representation early advances leverage positioning against insurance companies well versed in minimizing payout claims and hence, protecting your entitled rights.

At Carlson Bier, we shoulder the labyrinthine aspects of personal injury law by manifesting ourselves as formidable representation. Our proficient practitioners are committed to adhering to an unparalleled degree of diligence when it relates to identifying key case details, understanding loopholes within disputable evidence and tailoring an aggressive legal strategy accordingly.

One salient feature imbibed within our ethical compass is a steadfast belief in maintaining transparency with respect to process briefs, honest case evaluation or forecast relating potential outcomes so that our clients feel comfortable knowing they’ve trusted their matters into hands following integrity par excellence mandate.

The tenacity demonstrated by our team lays testament towards maximum possible compensation recovery leveraging strategic negotiation techniques or readiness for taking the matter before jury trial if necessity dictates same. With Carlson Bier at helm there’s absolutely no room left for sparing chances concerning result maximization because nothing less than narrative alteration favorably to unique situation’s requirement gets deemed as adequate!

Considering each incident holds its own unique set of circumstances, determining the true worth of a personal injury case calls for specialized insight. As personal injury attorneys based out Illinois office – not Murrayville; do note -we’re dedicated towards offering exceptional legal insights backed up by decades-long experience thus stands us apart from competition! Meticulously analyzing every component like property damage(s), medical expenses along with non-tangible factors such as emotional distress, loss enjoyment amenities life amongst others helps us channel fair value estimate for claim award eligibility assessment

So why wait? If you’re grappling with questions regarding your personal injury incident and don’t know where to turn, reach out today. Sharp insights paired with compassionate support equals Carlson Bier. Click on the button below now and discover what rightful compensation you may be entitled in light of seeming adversity.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Murrayville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Murrayville

Areas of Practice in Murrayville

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Supplying skilled legal advice for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal support to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Slip Injuries

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Injuries

Extending legal guidance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Accidents: Committed to helping sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for damages and damages.

Motorbike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Incident

Offering professional legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Dedicated to delivering professional legal advice for clients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Demise

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on representing victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer