FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Nashville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we champion the rights of individuals who’ve endured unimaginable pain as a result of dog bite injuries. As highly skilled personal injury attorneys, our area of expertise encompass all aspects relating to canine aggression cases in diverse jurisdictions including Nashville. Dog bites can cause severe physical and emotional harm, from disfigurement to lasting trauma – our team is vastly experienced with handling these nuances effectively. We delve into the intricacies associated with each case providing diligent guidance throughout the claim process while pursuing maximum compensation for you. Our lawyers are deeply passionate about ensuring justice for victims; leveraging their profound knowledge and tenacity against insurmountable odds doggedly achieving clients’ satisfaction.. Choosing Carlson Bier equates to gaining a stalwart advocate fighting tirelessly against formidable insurance companies on your behalf—an essential ally amidst complicated legal proceedings synonymous with dog bite cases—it signifies obtaining unrivaled legal support enabling resolution while helping assuage fears associated with this life-altering occurrence.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Nashville Illinois

Welcome to the website of Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois. As experienced legal practitioners, our primary concern is offering valuable resources and extending steadfast representation to clients who have suffered personal injuries such as dog bite incidents. Behind every case we handle resides not just a client, but an individual whose life has been significantly impacted due to a distressing event.

Knowledge is power, hence comprehensive understanding about dog bite injuries can empower you during these trying times. Dog bites often lead to severe physical wounds, emotional trauma and heavy financial burdens for victims. It’s more than just physical pain; it may involve prolonged therapy sessions for psychological healing and large medical bills that add onto your woes.

Several factors come into play when assessing the impact of a dog bite injury:

– Nature and extent of the injury: Could range from minor scratches on the surface skin layer or puncture wounds leading to deep tissue damage.

– Medical expenses: From immediate response treatment at emergency rooms to further therapy procedures necessary for full recovery.

– Emotional damages: The trauma induced by the incident could result in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety or even depression.

– Loss of income: If you are unable to work due to the severity of injuries sustained or required time off from work for recovery.

By enlisting Carlson Bier’s expertise, you engage with attorneys who are dedicated in ensuring court systems recognize these damages while fighting diligently for rightful compensation.

Dog owners bear a responsibility towards ensuring their pets do not pose harm unto others. Unfortunately, failures occur despite regulations stressing this aspect. According to Illinois law, it operates under ‘strict liability’ towards dog-bite cases wherein owners cannot escape responsibility simply because they weren’t aware their pet could be violent.

Intricate laws govern each state; possessing thorough knowledge becomes critical in pursuing rightful justice after suffering from traumatic experiences like a dog-bite incident. Our team at Carlson Bier shines brightest in such moments. With a meticulous understanding of personal injury law specific to Illinois and an assiduous study of your particular case, we leave no stone unturned to secure the compensation you deserve.

One key resource provided by our team is around-the-clock accessibility—it’s crucial that support and advice from legal experts be made available during your time of need. You are not alone when facing this trying situation; the Carlson Bier team stands by you, reiterating our credo—that at heart, we’re more than just lawyers but advocates for justice willing to go the extra mile for those under our representation.

Reading about dog bite incidents reaffirms their complexity on multiple levels. Every incident leaves unique imprints both on victims’ lives and impact resolution pathways each case pursues. While offering valuable insights basing across several dog bite cases handled over years, we understand that general information may not answer all questions specific to your current predicament

The extent of damage after a dog-bite goes beyond physical injuries sustained; it also impinges onto Daily life activities taking emotional tolls alongside financial burdens resulting from medical expenses or lost income during recovery phase– all these facets come into consideration while estimating what a case could be worth. Emphasizing this underscores our commitment towards full transparency providing objective estimations based on an exhaustive understanding of your unique case details.

We encourage you to take advantage now – click on the button below so we can give you an accurate estimate regarding what your case could be potentially worth. Trust in our expertise as we navigate complexities together ensuring every pertinent detail is considered during valuation process—join us at Carlson Bier as we champion deserved recompense promoting healing and closure for trauma endured due to unfortunate circumstances surrounding dog-bite incidents.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Nashville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Nashville

Areas of Practice in Nashville

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending skilled legal help for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending expert legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering skilled legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Fall Incidents

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Crashes: Devoted to helping victims of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for harms and destruction.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Accident

Providing professional legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Building Incidents

Focused on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Harms

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and experienced legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Dedicated to representing victims with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440