...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Nauvoo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can lead to tremendous physical and emotional distress. Legal representation becomes crucial as you navigate insurance claims, medical bills, or even the justice system. Carlson Bier law firm is ready to act on your behalf—providing exceptional legal services for cases involving dog bite injuries in Illinois. We’re proud of our track record mitigating challenging incidents where others back away due to lack of expertise. What sets us apart is our team’s passion combined with comprehensive knowledge about local and state laws regarding animal attacks, ensuring your rights are upheld during this difficult time. Embedded within these intricacies lies an unparalleled commitment to obtain substantial compensation for victims’ suffering and losses connected with these unfortunate occurrences throughout the great land of Lincoln; including Nauvoo’s community members who have been forced through such traumatic experiences without fault or provocation on their part.

We see every case as unique—and so should you! Experience the proven proficiency of Carlson Bier law firm today.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Nauvoo Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on being one of Illinois’s leading legal firms specializing in personal injury claims — particularly dog bite injuries. We’ve accomplished a history marked by exceptional results for our clients who have experienced these traumatic incidents and are dedicated to sustaining this record of achieving the best possible result for every case.

Dog attacks can lead to severe physical harm and intense emotional trauma. Unfortunately, these incidents are more common than you might think. In fact, according to statistics from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), nearly 1 in 5 people bitten by dogs require medical attention. Anyone is potentially at risk; however, children are often the most vulnerable victims of dog bites and are more likely to be severely injured.

Understanding Dog Bite Law in Illinois is crucial if you or a loved one has been bitten by a dog. In Illinois:

• typically, owners are responsible for their pets’ behavior.

• an owner can be held liable even if the animal had not previously shown any signs of aggression nor caused harm previously.

• it’s irrelevant whether an attack occurs on public or private property.

Clearly demonstrating liability requires navigating complex legal territories.

Victims commonly sustain both substantial physical wounds and psychological trauma after such distressing experiences- something that should never be underestimated or overlooked. This could include severe puncture wounds, lacerations, fractures, infections like rabies or even PTSD symptoms post-attack – all disorders which require extensive treatment.

The consequences extend beyond immediate medical expenses too: lasting trauma may mean therapy costs long-term while serious impairment could necessitate ongoing care or surgery down the line creating significant financial burden over time. Missed work due to recovery also equates to lost income – further amplifying stress during this trying period.

As experts in personal injury law with vast experience handling cases involving domestic animals’ aggressions, representatives from Carlson Bier will listen sensitively and act decisively advocating for your interests throughout proceedings maintaining clear communication every step along the way. We have successfully secured generous settlements for countless clients, helping with immediate and future medical expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering among additional compensatory damages.

Attempting to navigate these legal complexities alone is overwhelming especially when reeling from such an ordeal. It’s necessary to employ professionals who can command this area of personal injury law proficiently in order to achieve favorable resolutions thereby easing undue pressures so you can focus on what truly matters – recovery.

You don’t have to fret about initial consultation fees with Carlson Bier. Unlike many law firms, we operate on a contingency basis which means no upfront costs – our fees are deducted from any settlement or verdict funds at the end of your case. Additionally, there won’t be any charge if we do not make a successful claim on your behalf!

Your journey towards recovery after a dog bite incident begins with us here at Carlson Bier. As a highly qualified, experienced and compassionate team of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we relentlessly endeavor to safeguard your rights and interests following these traumatic experiences; carefully guiding you through each stage of proceedings translating intricate legalese into easily understandable language.

Are you ready to explore how our experts may assist during this crucial moment? Interested to see how much compensation could potentially be retrieved for your specific situation? If yes, feel free click the button below — it’ll facilitate direct contact with one of our experienced representatives dedicated towards discussing potential avenues available within Illinois state ordinances seeking best possible outcome against those responsible ensuring justice gets served appropriately while aiding return normalcy post accident as swiftly as feasibly possible. Bear in mind: irrespective distance between client firm’s physical locations throughout Illinois state – at Carlson Bier ensure everyone receives equal opportunity representation making vast professional resources accessible anyone anywhere! Don’t just take word this though – instead experience impeccable services first hand exploring potential settlements worth yourself today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Nauvoo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Nauvoo

Areas of Practice in Nauvoo

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending specialist legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering expert legal support to victims affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Tumble Occurrences

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Traumas

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for harms and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring professional legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Building Incidents

Focused on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Committed to ensuring specialized legal representation for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in tackling cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on representing patients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer