...

Bicycle Accidents in Near South Side

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event of a bicycle accident, finding competent legal representation is paramount. Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury lawyer firm based in Illinois, offers unparalleled expertise in handling Bicycle Accidents cases. Our specialists are well-versed with unique challenges that arise from such accidents and strive to secure fair compensation for your losses. Whether it’s reckless driving or poor traffic control design responsible for your predicament, rest assured knowing you have dedicated advocates working relentlessly on your behalf at Carlson Bier. With our comprehensive understanding of Illinois statutes relevant to bicycle accidents and experience in courtrooms statewide, we stand as an optimal choice regardless of where the incident occurred – even Near South Side. Trust us to ensure justice does not remain out-of-reach due to geographic limitations. Instead allow our proficiency and commitment drive results in pursuing rightful reparation for damages incurred through cycling-related mishaps – entrust your case to Carlson Bier because excellence isn’t limited by zip code.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Near South Side Illinois

At the time-tested Illinois law firm of Carlson Bier, we understand that navigating through a lawsuit after traumatic bicycle accidents can feel like trying to pedal uphill. We want you to know; you don’t have to face this climb alone. We specialize in personal injury lawsuits and strive tirelessly for justice while adding value to our community by offering decisive legal services.

A bicycle accident is often an abrupt and shocking event that can lead to severe, life-altering injuries. Due to their less protective nature compared with other modes of transportation, bicyclists are at a higher risk of sustaining serious damages from collisions with motor vehicles. It’s crucial to understand your rights as an injured cyclist and seek skilled personal injury lawyers on your side who can help you recognize if you have a valid claim.

Please consider these essential points:

• The culprit might not just be the motorist: Poorly maintained roads, dog attacks, or faulty bike equipment also contribute significantly.

• State Bicycle Laws matter: Different states mandate different safety laws designed exclusively for cyclists.

• Remember every detail about road conditions, weather conditions could be pivotal information during your case proceedings.

• Based on situations revolving negligence principles, comparative negligence standards might affect the recovery amount you receive.

Here at Carlson Bier Associates, emphasizing bicycle accidents has enabled us expertise in understanding that neglectful motorists seldom accept culpability when involved in accidents with bicyclists willingly. That’s precisely why obtaining evidence such as eyewitness accounts, medical reports unequivocally suggesting trauma directly related to the collision narrative or any immediate after-accident pictures showing traffic light status when contacted must form part of any exhaustive investigation into claiming rightful damages incurred owing negligent driving.

In Illinois state specifically where strict liability applies; if found negligent even slightly (1% or more), drivers will bear responsibility partly or wholly towards remedying the victim-cyclist losses notwithstanding any carefulness they argue having demonstrated while driving leading up-to-the-incident.

The Carlson Bier legal arsenal boasts potent weaponry to complicate any defense strategies resisting rightful compensation payment orders. Our thorough understanding of Illinois state laws linked with road traffic accidents, regularly updated awareness about changing legal environment nationally influencing personal injuries cases dealing with bicycle accidents coupled with our approach treating every claim as unique has contribute substantially in securing sizable restitution from responsible parties for our esteemed clientele.

We firmly believe that empathetic care blended with strong professionalism sets us apart. For us at Carlson Bier, you’re not merely another case file but a valued person deserving much-needed assistance during tough times ahead. Once contacted rest assured your queries wouldn’t be left unanswered, and let us together seek justice through the maze of personal injury lawsuits post unfortunate bicycle mishaps.

As we wrap up this essential information on Bicycle Accidents, we hope it’s brought immense value to you. You may now have an increased feeling of uncertainty about the worth of your case considering these thoughts provoking elements critical within personal injury lawsuits premises dealing with bicycling mishaps. Feel free to harness our experience and specialization focused around Bicycle Accidents even further by clicking the button below – a step towards finding out how much your case could potentially be worth making sure nothing is left on the table while negotiating rightful claims.

Remember, every second counts after receiving injuries due to another party’s negligence – Don’t delay reaching out!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Near South Side Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Near South Side

Areas of Practice in Near South Side

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving skilled legal advice for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering dedicated legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying adept legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Stumble Accidents

Professional in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their losses.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to guiding victims of car accidents obtain appropriate remuneration for injuries and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing professional legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for damages.

Building Collisions

Dedicated to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to delivering expert legal services for clients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Harm

Specializing in representing victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer