...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Neoga

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unpredictable event of a dog bite injury, you need an experienced legal team who understands Illinois laws and procedures to ensure your rights are protected. Carlson Bier offers sterling expertise—all too necessary when facing the often complex world of personal injury law. With their deep knowledge base in handling dog bite cases specifically, they’re exceptionally positioned to guide victims through this traumatic time. Dog attacks can be devastating both physically and emotionally—this is why we work tirelessly for clients so that justice is served and restitution achieved. After working on countless cases alike across Neoga area, Carlson Bier has established an unyielding reputation for standing firmly by its clients’ side all the while delivering results that compensate deservedly for their unfortunate injuries or suffering caused by such incidents. When securing your future after a regrettable dog attack incident matters – trust only unbelievably steadfast yet empathetic representation like Carlson Bier—the attorneys who prioritize client interests above all else.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Neoga Illinois

At the Carlson Bier law firm, we understand how traumatic a dog bite injury can be. Being based in Illinois, we have witnessed firsthand the rising number of cases relating to such injuries occurring here. A dog bite not only causes physical harm but also emotional distress and psychological trauma.

Dog bites may result in serious injuries including puncture wounds, fractures, disfigurement or permanent scarring. These are compounded by complications like infections if not treated promptly and correctly. It is crucial to recognize your right to seek legal remedies and compensation as a victim of an act as dreadful as this.

• First thing first, remember that you’re eligible for damages claims if you were legally on the premises where the event occurred – whether it was public property or private dwelling.

• Secondly, be sure that no provocation from your end initiated the attack.

• Even landlord negligence could play into effect with them facing liability if they knew about their tenant’s dangerous animal but failed nothing do anything about it.

• Long term effects should never be overlooked – loss of earnings due to time off work and expenses on counselling sessions fall under honing compensations legally deemed fit for you.

Victims often don’t realize these aspects until they connect with a knowledgeable attorney who specializes in personal injury cases related to dog attacks.

Here at Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on understanding this niche thoroughly and providing robust representation for our clients throughout Illinois. Our expert attorneys specialize in reviewing medical reports meticulously while collecting evidence through witnesses along with detailed photographs to make a strong case for you against dog owners who failed in controlling their pets leading to these dreaded circumstances.

We firmly believe communication plays an incredible role when dealing it comes cases linked with personal injures caused by dog bites– ensuring regular updates making certain that all actions instil confidence is what Carlson Bier stands for . Each client at our reputed law establishment experiences absolute transparency regarding proceeding phases hand-in-hand putting forth plans aligning perfectly executed plans to your best interests at heart.

A pivotal part of winning cases like these is a comprehensive understanding of both local regulations and Illinois state law. The team here at Carlson Bier personal injury attorneys has spent years acquiring an in-depth understanding exactly those areas, allowing us to expertly navigate complex legal landscapes on behalf of our clients. Our dedication extends to making sure you are not just appropriately compensated for the medical expenses, but also psychological treatments required after suffering from such emotionally draining incidents.

Navigating through this challenging phase might not be easy, yet standing by committed lawyers eases the ordeal considerably. Lawyers at Carlson Bier deliver superior expertise with utmost empathy as opposed regular negligence encountered elsewhere rarely get stringent punishment they deserve under Illinois State Law – aiding victims just like yourself feel vindicated and bringing negligent dog owners into accountability being our sole mission.

Our commitment remains steadfast towards providing value-oriented legal services to our clients coupled with insistence on transparency throughout your journey encompassing investigation-to-litigation covering compensation win. Additionally, we offer contingence based representation meaning we only receive payment once successful remuneration has been achieved.

At Carlson Bier expect nothing short of unwavering support partnered with high-quality representation enabling you reliable opportunity accomplishing fair settlement against distressing animal attack aftermaths faced so bravely thus far – remember you’re never alone in your fight!

Feeling curious about the worth of your case? For further assistance and detailed analysis ahead click the button below giving access directly connect efficient professionals who are ever-ready ensuring towering credibility buildups regarding your case standing victorious end delivering due diligence at every step held alongside sincere encouragement irradiating positive vibe effectively while dealing implications dog-bite injuries henceforth proved so pivotal in terms recovery or gaining renewed identity! Click now and take proactive steps today. We are only a call away!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Neoga Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Neoga

Areas of Practice in Neoga

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing expert legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal services for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, extending skilled legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Slip Accidents

Skilled in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to aiding clients of car accidents receive just recompense for damages and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Collision

Providing specialist legal representation for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in delivering compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Specializing in representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer