...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Neponset

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with devastating dog bite injuries, you need experienced legal representation – Carlson Bier is your ultimate ally. As a reputed personal injury law firm in Illinois, we understand that traumatic events require more than just recovery; they necessitate justice and compensation. Specializing in Dog Bite Injuries litigation specifically, our tenacious attorneys at Carlson Bier are dedicated to providing the exceptional service you deserve. Rest assured, every case is handled diligently by our formidable team who are well-versed in navigating complex local laws about dog bites and personal injuries across diverse cities including Neponset. We excel at securing maximum damages for medical bills lost wages due to debilitating injuries caused by rogue canines. With years of accomplished practice under their collective belt, the firm does not merely represent clients–they ensure peace-of-mind throughout the entire process through effective communication and personalized services tailored to each unique situation. Choose Carlson Bier as your preferred defenders against dog-bite related disputes — choose justice delivered.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Neponset Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand how distressing a dog bite can be. Not only does it result in physical injury, but it can also inflict psychological trauma that lasts long after the incident. We know – most personal injury cases involving dog bites are loaded with aspects of emotional suffering as well as confusion about your rights and responsibilities under Illinois law.

Under the provisions of Illinois Law’s Animal Control Act, liability for injuries induced by pets often falls directly on their owners. Whether you were taking a stroll through your neighborhood or visiting someone else’s residence when attacked by a dog, it is crucial to attest that you neither provoked the animal nor unlawfully trespassed onto private property – two primary defenses presented frequently against these claims.

• The first step following an attack is securing medical attention immediately.

• Secondly, try identifying the offending dog and its owner if feasible.

• Reporting the incident to adequate local authorities is the third significant measure.

• Lastly, gather names and contact information from any eye-witnesses present during the event.

The effects of such injuries extend beyond visible wounds or scars; they often involve extensive treatments required over extended periods─ including potential restorative medical procedures and continuous mental-health counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms suffering victims may face. However, there’s always assistance available to people who face dire situations resulting from another’s disregard or neglect – like an attribute demonstrated by a culpable pet-owner not exercising proper control over their animals.

Illinois law doesn’t restrict compensation solely towards covering actual expenses suffered due to immediate medical care following an attack; instead, it encompasses: loss of income if work has been missed due to recovery time needed; costs concerning future surgical operations linked to your injuries developed; ongoing requirements for psychological therapy or psychiatric medication necessary because of endured trauma; diminished quality-of-life experienced regarding pain & suffering terms among other things too.

As experienced legal professionals at Carlson Bier specializing in dealing with personal injury lawsuits in Illinois, we can further elucidate how potential damages may apply to your specific scenario. We offer you all the essential information you need to know about handling dog bite injury claims, ensuring that you are well-briefed about your rights.

When presenting a claim for compensation under these circumstances, it is paramount that the victim could demonstrate how their non-contribution towards any contributory negligence part attributed – this would be substantial because one’s recovery decreases according to levels where blame can be apportioned back onto them reasonably. This implies, if an injured person partly acted negligently leading towards accident occurrence themselves somehow (like ignoring explicit warning against entering a dog’s territory), then compensational rewards’ size set becomes physically smaller proportionally reflecting shared liability extent involved overall.

With Carlson Bier by your side, navigation through this complicated process becomes significantly more manageable. Our team of seasoned attorneys is adept at accumulating evidence that verifies the owner’s negligence resulting in a client’s unacceptable harm or financial drawback. We offer proper guidance regarding the required procedures and deadlines that must be adhered to, ensuring effective results.

Pursuing litigation seems overwhelming – but chances increase greatly when placing trust within our capable hands assisting you every step desired throughout proceedings from filing initial legal documents all way up until obtaining a satisfactory settlement outcome delivered as deserved rightfully.Ensuring full benefits protection provided under law available isn’t simply something we do: it hallmarks what stands behind commitment made here at Carlson Bier!

Take action today; there’s no time like the present moment for putting fears aside and opting covey charge led perhaps toward brighter futures seeking beyond shadow cast by another’s irresponsible act looming over unneccesarily. Click on the button below to find out just how much your case is worth ─ and let us help in making tentative steps forward into setting things right again!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Neponset Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Neponset

Areas of Practice in Neponset

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering skilled legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Hospital Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Trip Injuries

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Focused on guiding sufferers of car accidents get equitable recompense for harms and impairment.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Incident

Extending specialist legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Worksite Accidents

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Impairments

Committed to providing professional legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to supporting individuals with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer