FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in New Boston

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When the unexpected occurs and you find yourself to be a victim of a pedestrian accident, Carlson Bier illuminates the pathway towards justice. As experienced personal injury attorneys serving clients in New Boston, their unwavering commitment is rooted deeply in championing for your rights. With an esteemed reputation built on successful precedence, they meticulously analyze each case to devise comprehensive strategies that ensure fair restitution. They navigate complex legal theaters with fierce advocacy that complements their understanding of Illinois laws like no other firm can offer. More than just competent law practitioners, at Carlson Bier, empathy walks hand-in-hand with legality as they acknowledge your situation’s emotional implications too! Guiding you through arduous battles against daunting insurance companies while keeping your welfare at heart – this is what makes them stand out from every crowd! Trust them in transforming traumatic episodes into victories where justice triumphs and healing births resurgence – Carlson Bier represents more than just excellent legal representation; it symbolizes resolute backing when life’s unpredictability strikes hardest.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in New Boston Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a dedicated personal injury attorney group that specializes in pedestrian accidents. Based in Illinois, we have gathered invaluable experience representing countless clients who were victims of pedestrian accidents across the state. Our team of highly skilled attorneys understands the devastating aftermath of such incidents and is committed to ensuring you receive full compensation for your injuries.

Pedestrian accidents occur when drivers neglect their responsibility to share the road safely with walkers and cyclists. These tragic incidents may result in extensive physical damages including head injuries, spinal cord damage, broken bones etc., financial strain due to medical bills and lost wages, and psychological trauma as a consequence of the horrific event.

Highly preventable factors contribute to most pedestrian accidents:

– Distracted driving: This includes talking on cell phones while driving, texting & driving or focusing attention elsewhere apart from the roadway.

– Driver negligence: Yielding right-of-way errors at crosswalks or not giving pedestrians visibility can lead to these unfortunate instances.

– Reckless Driving: Excessive speeding or failing to obey traffic signals indicates reckless behavior increasing chances of pedestrian accidents.

– Impaired Driving: Consuming alcohol or drugs ahead of getting behind the wheel poses grave risks not just for drivers but pedestrians too.

Injuries from such mishaps often go beyond physical wounds – they affect every aspect of one’s life disrupting routine work schedules leading to loss of income and piling medical expenses. You might be grappling with unimaginable emotional turmoil brought on by an unforeseen change in your quality of life.

Naturally then arises the question – Where does liability lay? Often proving fault isn’t as simple as it seems. A competent personal injury lawyer specialized in handling pedestrian accident cases will be capable enough to undertake thorough investigations pinpointing liability accurately.

Every case is unique; evaluation depends heavily on specifics like place where accident occurred (crosswalks/zones), driver’s demeanor during incident & post-facto feedback from eyewitnesses if any present. At Carlson Bier, we employ all of our resources to build the strongest possible case for you.

A question that might linger is – ‘What amount can one expect via compensation?’ Compensation generally attempts to restore victims into position they were prior incident. Your remuneration may encompass:

– Medical expenses: You should recoup entirety of medical expenses incurred as direct result accident.

– Loss of earnings: This consists wages lost during convalescing period post-accident and might further extend to cover potential projected future income losses if accident imposes long-term incapacitation.

– Pain & suffering: Non-economic damages like pain, distress, emotional turmoil etc., which are often harder to quantify but have had a tangible impact on your life.

Choosing the right attorney who comprehends intricacies involved in pedestrian accidents is essential for securing justifiable compensation benefits. Backed by years of experience dealing with diverse personal injury claims viz pedestrian accidents across Illinois, at Carlson Bier we address your legal needs confidently helping you navigate through complex process ensuring best possible results.

Our client-centric approach underlines our commitment towards providing personalized attention on every case efficiently striving towards easing out stress associated with challenging ordeal helping you retrieve your rightful claim.

Take this crucial step towards safeguarding your rights today by getting started with an initial consultation with our expert professionals free of charge! Suffering an accidental injury doesn’t mean succumbing to financial insecurity or settling for less than what you’re truly entitled. Click on the button below now and uncover how much worth does your unique case holds genuinely guided by experienced representatives from Carlson Bier. The pathway towards justice doesn’t need be insurmountable when precision-guided expertise is within easy reach!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For New Boston Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in New Boston

Areas of Practice in New Boston

Bicycle Incidents

Proficient in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing professional legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Injuries

Specialist in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on guiding sufferers of car accidents gain just remuneration for damages and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Providing expert legal services for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Impairment

Committed to assisting clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​