Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in New City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with debilitating spinal cord injuries, you need a legal ally who will fight for your rights unyieldingly. Carlson Bier rises supreme in this landscape, fielding exceptional professionals renowned for their comprehensive knowledge of spinal cord injury law. Our mutual dedication to attain the best possible outcome for our clients sets us apart from typical personal injury lawyers. From understanding medical intricacies to mastering the nuances of insurance claims and settlements, we are adept at handling complex scenarios that can significantly impact both negotiations and trial outcomes. As such, partnering with Carlson Bier ensures stringent representation grounded on expertise and compassion. Our mission is not just securing compensation but also advocating your fair treatment throughout the entire judicial process – be it related to workplace accidents or negligent behavior causing harm. Take control today; mitigate uncertainties inherent in these circumstances by entrusting yourself to experienced attorneys like those found amidst Carlson Bier’s ranks who consistently excel in tackling cases like yours across Illinois’ jurisdictional reach.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in New City Illinois

Spinal cord injuries can have an unimaginably profound impact on a person’s life. They disrupt nerve signals, potentially leading to paralysis and other devastating outcomes that may necessitate long-term care or functional assistance. As specialists in personal injury law here at Carlson Bier, based in Illinois, we understand the intricate complexities associated with cases involving spinal cord injuries.

Spinal cord injuries typically occur due to traumatic events such as vehicular accidents, falls, sports incidents, and acts of violence among others. Often these are preventable occurrences where another party can be held legally responsible for negligence leading to said injury. Seeking legal recourse from the individual or entity accountable for your injury can help you obtain deserved compensation to support medical treatment costs, loss of income capabilities as well as emotional distress.

Allow us at Carlson Bier to guide you through a brief understanding of what spinal cord injuries entail:

• The severity of a spinal cord injury fundamentally depends on which part of the spine is damaged; cervical (neck), thoracic(mid-back), lumbar(lower back) or sacral(bottom of the spine).

• Symptoms vary widely – ranging from pain/numbness in regions above/below the site of injury or even complete loss of muscle control.

• Spinal cord injuries are usually classified into “complete,” denoting total loss of sensation and muscle function below the level of injury; and “incomplete,” indicating some motor or sensory function below affected level still exists.

• Implications could involve physical impairments including quadriplegia & paraplegia, along with complications such as respiratory issues, pressure sores & mental health concerns.

Without doubt, coming to terms with a spinal cord injury is emotionally overwhelming alongside being financially taxing. This is precisely why seeking proper legal representation becomes crucial in relieving some burden off your shoulders. We stand firm by your side working diligently towards achieving best possible results under given circumstances.

Our skilled attorneys meticulously investigate details concerning your case to demonstrate the gravity of harm caused, including the compilation of medical records and professional testimonies. These extensive efforts aid in manifesting before either insurance companies or a jury the enormous personal loss suffered as well as showcasing how it has critically hampered normal life functions.

Besides securing financial compensation for evident damages such as present & future medical expenses, rehabilitation costs etc., Carlson Bier takes steps further by claiming ‘pain and suffering’ damages, thereby acknowledging the profound emotional impact spinal cord injuries have on one’s quality of life. We also tenaciously fight for punitive damages in cases where we can prove that negligent parties showed reckless indifference to your well-being/safety.

Our aim at Carlson Bier is not just about getting you fair compensation but more so extending compassionate legal support during these fervent times. Remember, no upfront fees are applicable until a favorable settlement is achieved; hence mitigating any additional stress typically associated with hiring legal help.

Bear in mind – every spinal injury case has unique facets and what worked out best for another might not necessarily apply to yours completely. Therefore, gaining sound legal advice tailored specifically around your circumstances becomes vital. Our seasoned attorneys here at Carlson Bier will keenly assess the merits of your potential claim while offering transparent guidance on realistic expectations concerning achievable outcomes.

If you or a loved one has endured a spinal cord injury due to someone else’s negligence, allow us to hold them accountable for their wrongdoings while you focus wholeheartedly on recovery. Let us help you navigate through this overwhelming phase with stringent professionalism infused with empathetic understanding.

In light of everything discussed above pertaining to spinal cord injuries, if left hitherto uncertain about pursuing justice for experienced hardship owing to others’ negligence – let our highly competent lawyers assist you! Please click on the button below without further ado and find out how much your case could potentially be worth. Together at Carlson Bier, we advocate passionately towards achieving rightful redress for your incurred suffering. Remember – you are not alone in this fight! Your first step towards demanding justice commences right here.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For New City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in New City

Areas of Practice in New City

Bike Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Supplying specialist legal help for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Carelessness

Delivering expert legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering specialist legal assistance to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Specialist in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Offering legal assistance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting individuals of car accidents secure just compensation for injuries and harm.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Mishap

Providing professional legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for damages.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Damages

Focused on extending professional legal support for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Expert in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer