FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in New Lenox

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with dog bite injuries in New Lenox, securing elite legal representation is crucial. Acknowledged for our unmatched track record and astute attention to detail, Carlson Bier offers impeccable services to ensure you receive the justice you rightly deserve. Possessing a profound understanding of complex dog bite injury lawsuits under Illinois law, our personal injury attorneys are committed to help clients maneuver these challenges effortlessly. We meticulously strategize your case by combining vast experience, up-to-date knowledge of current legislation and aggressive advocacy for optimum results. Our relentless pursuit of favourable outcomes stems from compassionate regard for your feelings at this trying time, as we work beyond norms towards maximum compensation for physical and emotional trauma suffered due to dog bites. Vibrant within Illinois’ legal landscape but not limited in reach or resources – Carlson Bier stands unrivaled when seeking steadfast resolution in your fight towards reclaiming peace after enduring a daunting incident like a dog bite injury.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in New Lenox Illinois

When you have been the victim of a dog bite injury, justice and compensation may seem far off. But at Carlson Bier, your personal injury attorneys situated in Illinois, we are equipped with significant expertise to navigate through complex legal problems associated with dog bite injuries. Canine aggression can result in severe physical and psychological trauma. Secondly, the wounds could escalate into more serious medical issues if not properly treated.

At Carlson Bier potent knowledge of Illinois law combined with an assertive yet empathetic approach makes us your reliable ally as we help guide you towards comprehending your situation better. One vital clarification is that under Illinois law known as ‘strict liability’ in terms of dog bite cases, an owner is liable for an unprovoked attack on individuals who are legally at the location where such attacks occur.

Further essential information involves knowing that multiple parties could be held accountable for a dog bite incident: not just the pet owners but landlords or property managers too if it can be proven they were aware of any potential threat posed by their tenant’s dogs. Equally crucial is understanding what actually substantiates provocation — actions like pulling a dog’s tail or hitting them may qualify as provocation diminishing chances for recovery.

Having established those points, let’s advance further to establish what you might expect out of pursuing litigation after suffering from a canine assault:

• Reimbursements: The said party responsible for the incident could compensate for all medical expenses related to immediate treatment and future healthcare costs necessitated by sustained injuries.

• Lost Wages: Mean compensations could cover any income loss resulting from recuperating time off work.

• Emotional Trauma: Victims may also obtain recovery funds acknowledging psychological distress endured from a canine attack.

• Punitive Damages: If deemed appropriate by court based on egregious conduct/ neglect demonstrated by defendants.

The complexity behind such cases warrants having experienced attorneys working diligently to ensure every possible avenue for compensation is ferreted out and explored. Besides aiding in the collection of appropriate evidence, at Carlson Bier we ensure timely filing within Illinois’ statute of limitations. Claims ought to be filed not exceeding 2 years from occurrence date.

Dedication towards client service is a creed by which we staunchly abide here at Carlson Bier, aiming for nothing less than maximum compensation for every individual suffering hardships stemming from dog bite injuries. Understanding your rights and taking prompt legal action reduces stress while having as little damage on your life as possible permitting swifter recovery periods.

And now that this comprehensive information is under your belt, it’s time to take the next crucial step: understanding exactly how much you might be owed. Compensation varies significantly from claim-to-claim; making use of our deep-rooted experience will provide accurate evaluations personalized to specific circumstances carved by your unique case. As the premier personal injury attorneys in Illinois, here at Carlson Bier, we are committed tirelessly advocating for justice on behalf of dog bite victims statewide.

So don’t endure such inflictions quietly without considering facts pointed out above—an incident involving canine aggression could entitle you monetary benefits substantial enough for aiding recovery effectively besides reinforcing some amount of solace during distressed times.

Remember Carlson Bier are law experts waiting eagerly to aid you wrangle possible justice and release unnecessary burdens courtesy untimely distress caused due to dog bites. Feel free to click on the button below today itself with confidence knowing assistance sought is just a click away—get an estimate on what your case may potentially carry value-wise ensuring peace crawls back into strife-filled lives slowly but surely…in ways money simply cannot measure otherwise!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For New Lenox Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in New Lenox

Areas of Practice in New Lenox

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering skilled legal help for victims of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending expert legal guidance to individuals affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Tumble Incidents

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents receive fair settlement for injuries and damages.

Scooter Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Truck Crash

Ensuring experienced legal support for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Committed to extending professional legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Expert in defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440