FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in New Lenox

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one is in New Lenox and currently facing the ramifications of spinal cord injuries, Carlson Bier is your premier choice for legal representation. We specialize in personal injury law with particular emphasis on spinal cord injuries. Our expert team has extensive experience negotiating fair settlements and achieving successful verdicts for our clients, proving we’re unmatched when battling insurance companies refusing to pay out what’s rightly due. While many firms may claim expertise, few bring the depth of knowledge and intricate understanding of Illinois law required in these cases like ours do. Carlson Bier’s commitment goes beyond regular attorney-client relationships; we become advocates for your future well-being, ensuring justice isn’t only served but also paves way to recovery with rightfully deserved compensation aiding rehabilitation efforts post-injury. Trust our unyielding dedication towards each case coupled with unrivaled medical-legal knowledge that sets us apart as leaders in this field.

Count on us at Carlson Bier– where skill meets compassion, bringing justice home to those suffering from spinal cord injuries throughout New Lenox community regardless whether they’re residents or visitors needing help navigating through this challenging life experience.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in New Lenox Illinois

As leading personal injury attorneys, Carlson Bier prioritizes maximizing client outcomes. Our focus today centers on spinal cord injuries – a devastating event that often results in long-term consequences which disrupt every facet of the victim’s life.

First and foremost, it is crucial to understand the complexity of spinal cord injuries. This type of trauma typically results from forceful impacts during motor vehicle accidents, traumatic falls, acts of violence or sports-related incidents. The human spine essentially forms the central pillar not just physically but functionally as well within our body – housing intricate networks of nerves that journey from brain to numerous parts across our bodies.

Injury severity varies greatly. Sometimes partial recovery is possible, while others can result in permanent damage like paraplegia or quadriplegia. Critical indicators would be where along the spine it occurred (the higher up means larger affected areas) and whether it’s complete (all feeling below affected area lost) versus incomplete.

The implications ripple out far beyond physical limitations though; daily living activities become monumental tasks, long-term medical care skyrockets costs and mental health takes a severe toll due to drastic lifestyle changes.

At Carlson Bier firm we help navigate these extremely challenging circumstances by fighting tirelessly for rightful compensation against negligent parties responsible for these harmful incidents. Our team imparts expert guidance through understanding each unique scenario individually:

• Assuring maximum remuneration: We are dedicated towards mitigating your short- and long-term medical bills induced by such catastrophic incidents.

• Exercising legal rights: After an incident causing spinal cord injury victims may feel helpless about navigating complex legal dynamics – we step in offering a clear path.

• Comprehensive Case Evaluation: We analyze all aspects related to your accident carefully including collision dynamics, medical records investigation etc., thereby equipping us for strong case representation.

While encountering a spinal cord injury profoundly alters lives, seeking appropriate legal recourse helps alleviate some burdens associated with it. As experienced attorneys handling such cases, our laser-focused attention on legal intricacies combined with candid communication paves the way for making informed decisions.

We understand Illinois law nuances relevant in personal injury situations and maintain absolute transparency about our firm’s locations. Our commitment to operate ethically ensures we do not advertise services in cities where we don’t have a physical office. As your trusted advocates, it is paramount to us that lawful adherence goes hand-in-hand with unyielding compassion towards the hurdles you face.

Finally, remember that every spinal cord injury case exacts a unique value based on factors such as severity of the injury, accompanying medical costs, pain and suffering endured and loss of quality of life. Thus, establishing what your case could potentially be worth necessitates a substantial understanding of these parameters.

At Carlson Bier, providing no-cost evaluation forms an integral part of our first interaction – helping determine potential compensation value associated with your case upfront based on meticulous assessment of imperative details surrounding it.

Take this significant step today by clicking the button below! Begin your journey towards justly deserved compensation together with us – bringing forward resolution amidst turbulent times inflicted by catastrophic spinal cord injuries.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For New Lenox Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in New Lenox

Areas of Practice in New Lenox

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering skilled legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Offering expert legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Tumble Accidents

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Collisions: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents get just compensation for damages and damages.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Incident

Providing specialist legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Building Accidents

Focused on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to delivering specialized legal assistance for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Fatality

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal support to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440