...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in New Windsor

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For residents of New Windsor grappling with the aftermath of a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier understands that you need more than just medical attention – you deserve justice. As Illinois-based personal injury attorneys specializing in dog bite cases, we’re your steadfast champions in navigating this complex legal situation. Healing is a journey; not only physically but emotionally and financially as well. This is where our expertise comes into play to help ease your burden by seeking damages from negligent pet owners for their responsibility in your suffering. With years of experience under our belt, we wield an intimate knowledge of defining and applying Illinois’s intricate dog bite laws convincingly to fight tooth and nail for maximizing compensation on behalf of victims like you. We glimpse no other path but towards best possible outcomes tailored according to individual circumstances. Yes, it’s jarring experiences like yours which underline the importance of why Carlson Bier stands out as premier counsel when considering legal representation for dog bite injuries within Illinois boundaries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in New Windsor Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are more than just personal injury attorneys; we are advocates for our clients. We specialize in a wide array of personal injury claims and stand ready to provide victims with reliable legal counsel. One of the major areas we touch on is Dog Bite Injuries. Understanding the statistics and laws surrounding dog bite injuries helps one realize why they demand serious attention.

As per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 4.5 million people suffer from dog bites annually in the United States, causing physical wounds, emotional trauma, or both. Illinois stands out as one of the states where such incidents occur frequently, necessitating competent legal representation to ensure those affected secure justice.

– Know Your Rights: Illinois operates under what’s known as strict liability legal doctrine regarding dog bites. That means a dog owner can be held liable if their pet harms an innocent person without provocation.

– Document The Incident: Increasing your chances of winning such lawsuits demands concrete evidence indicating negligence on the part of the dog owner. Photos showing injuries sustained, detailed accounts from witnesses present during the incident, medical bills incurred due to treatment etc., substantiate your claim robustly.

– Immediate Steps Post-Bite: In order to safeguard your health and strengthen your case against negligent dog owners it is crucial that you seek immediate medical attention post-bite even if initial injuries appear minor.

Carlson Bier plays an instrumental role primarily by advising you promptly post-the incident about potential leads to explore while helping arrange top-notch medical care assessing current and future damages accurately. We prepare diligently before facing sophisticated insurance companies avoiding any exploitation loopholes they might find in unprepared victim’s cases.

Our seasoned lawyers scrutinize each detail meticulously covering bases that victims often overlook like quantifying pain & suffering endured due to psychological impact etc., thus bringing forth a comprehensive lawsuit seeking rightful compensation wherever applicable:

– Medical Expenses including emergency care fees, bandages/drugs costs,

– Lost Income as a result of injury-forced temporary or permanent job discontinuation,

– Non-economic damages accounting for pain & suffering, mental anguish.

Our primary aim at Carlson Bier is to make our clients whole again after such distressing experiences. Assigning a monetary value can often be difficult in cases involving non-economic losses but our adept lawyers do it seamlessly through experience-backed expertise ensuring victims secure full compensation deserved under Illinois law.

Owing to the unique circumstances surrounding each dog bite incident, reaching out to an experienced attorney can provide insights into your situation enabling an articulate strategic course of action that increases odds of success significantly and expedites the process. By partnering with Carlson Bier, you ensure yourself dedicated legal representation advocating relentlessly on your behalf against aggressive opposing parties during these challenging times thereby providing peace, solace and allowing undisturbed recovery periods .

Have you or someone close suffered due to negligent pet owners? Are you curious about what legal rights exist and how they apply specifically tailored to your unfortunate event concerning dog bites? We extend warm invites for individual consultations offering valued insights catered exclusively based on your precise needs. So hesitate no further! Click on the button below and get exclusive access into validating how much your claim’s worth potentially without any obligations attached. Allow premier experts at Carlson Bier lend you their proficient assistance – mobilizing their extensive resources ensuring deliverance unto justice path – standing firmly besides you every step along this challenging journey

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For New Windsor Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in New Windsor

Areas of Practice in New Windsor

Bicycle Collisions

Expert in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending specialist legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Stumble Injuries

Skilled in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Offering legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on assisting patients of car accidents get just payout for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering specialist legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Committed to providing compassionate legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Damage

Specializing in representing victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​