FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Newark

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, our specialty lies in championing for individuals affected by Spinal Cord Injuries. We bring our vast experience representing clients who have faced similar disastrous life events to every case we handle. Although tragic accidents result in spinal injuries that alter lives forever, the right legal aid can help mitigate these circumstances and provide financial relief for medical expenses and rehabilitation costs.

As your advocated law firm, we believe you deserve compensation tailored to counteract your unique situation caused by negligence or malintent. Our dedicated attorneys meticulously gather evidence and comprehensively scrutinize each aspect of your accident with a strategic approach toward getting justice served.

Carlson Bier maintains a successful practice backed by testimonies from numerous satisfied spinal cord injury clients receiving the compensation they not only need but rightfully deserve after enduring such hardships.

Though based in Illinois, the impact of our work is felt far beyond state lines across different cities – no bounds tie down what injustices we will confront on behalf of those disrupting their lives through debilitating injuries like yours.

Even within Newark’s city limits, if you seek remarkable legal expertise focused entirely on spinal cord injury cases- choosing Carlson Bier ensures unwavering support throughout this challenging journey towards restitution.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Newark Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law, advocating for justice for individuals like you who have endured unforeseen circumstances due to the negligence of others. As a reputable entity within Illinois, one of our areas of expertise is litigating cases related to Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI).

Spinal cord injuries present serious life-altering outcomes, often instigating dramatic changes in an individual’s lifestyle and generating mounting medical bills. A SCI can result from various causes including motor vehicle accidents, falls, sporting occurrences and acts of violence. Depending upon the severity and location of the SCI within the spinal column itself, different physiological results may occur: loss or compromised mobility; sensory impediments; bowel or bladder control difficulties; sexual functionality issues etc.

Dealing with such devastating consequences requires extensive medical treatment which frequently includes prolonged hospitalization periods and costly rehabilitation programs. Often survivors will need long-term care either at home or in specific facilities designed for such purposes – once again involving substantial financial investment.

With our comprehensive legal services covering SCIs, Carlson Bier provides aggressive and compassionate representation aiming to ease this overwhelming burden imposed by these unfortunate events:

• We offer free initial consultations where we listen carefully to your story and understandably clarify complex legal jargon.

• Our attorneys will diligently build a robust case file substantiated with strong evidence gathered through intensive investigations.

• We negotiate arduously with insurance companies ensuring maximum compensation possible derived from intricate understanding of their settlement patterns.

• If negotiations don’t resolve satisfactorily we are prepared to take your case forward till trial showcasing fierce litigation strategies whilst adhering strictly towards professional ethics.

The critical role education plays as part of our service execution model in assisting affected lives must be underscored – allowing you an informed decision-making process hence reducing uncertainties that could potentially add stress on top already traumatic experiences:

-Understanding SCIs: Exploring detailed nuances about what constitutes a SCI alongside potential effects it might impose – achieving clarity over the injury extent.

-SCI related legal entitlements: Shining light on your precise rights, liabilities, potential compensation amounts and application processes available under Illinois law in relation to SCIs.

-Navigating insurance policies: Drawing attention towards key factors that influence how claims against insurance companies should be strategized making evident a clear path for maximum recovery.

Utilizing Carlson Bier’s expertise not only grants you access to our collective knowledge of years successfully practicing personal injury law within Illinois but also ensures personalized representation staying close at heart with your unique needs. Our commitment remains staunchly honed upon delivering justice where it is due. We fight tirelessly till you receive fair compensation covering medical costs, lost wages alongside pain & suffering endured – igniting hopes towards a brighter future amidst dark times forced upon by SCI consequences.

We encourage anyone facing such predicaments seeking legal recourse or additional information pertaining to spinal cord injuries to reach out to us at Carlson Bier today. Navigating these challenging circumstances doesn’t need to be done alone; we are here beside you offering empathy, guidance and relentless dedication striving towards securing a just outcome for you. To take the first step towards ensuring this rightful claim click on the button below – enabling us together explore potential value implications surrounding your case making a significant difference in improving quality of your life post-injury.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Newark Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Newark

Areas of Practice in Newark

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Supplying professional legal help for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing skilled legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for damages and damages.

Bike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Truck Accident

Ensuring experienced legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for damages.

Building Crashes

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Traumas

Specializing in ensuring expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to advocating for persons with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​