...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Newman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a victim of dog bite injuries in Newman, Carlson Bier is your ultimate choice for legal assistance. Our breadth of expertise lies squarely within personal injury cases, particularly involving dog bites. Unlike other firms, we maintain an unwavering focus on these unique cases; our mission is to ensure victims get the justice they rightly deserve. We empathize with the emotional trauma and physical pain that accompanies such incidents and fight relentlessly to secure maximum compensation for medical expenses, lost wages and overall suffering endured. What truly differentiates us though? It’s more than just our overreaching commitment or comprehensive knowledge of Illinois law – it’s personalized service coupled with strategic negotiation skills fundamental in achieving favorable outcomes for clients dealing with canine-induced traumas. Carlson Bier fosters robust client relationships grounded in trust – we understand your world has been turned upside down post-injury and assure a supportive guide every step through recovery roadmaps intertwined amid complex litigation backdrop. Choose Carlson Bier: exceptional legal representation stemming from uncompromising dedication towards championing victim rights.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Newman Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the implications a dog bite injury can bring fore and center in someone’s life. A split-second event which may turn your daily routine into countless medical appointments and emotional distress. As a dedicated personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our core belief is in delivering justice to victims of such unwanted accidents.

Dog bite injuries are not only physically painful but emotionally traumatic as well. As per statistics, more than 4 million Americans experience dog bites annually. But how many truly comprehend their rights? Do you know that the laws inherently protect you after falling victim to these events?

One fundamental principle underlies within Illinois’s Animal Control Act – If you’re bitten or attacked by someone else’s pet without provoking it intentionally while legally present at the premises, you’re entitled to compensation for your physical and emotional suffering from the owner or carer of the dog.

Key aspects to remember about this regulation include:

– The act does not solely cover bites; it also involves other injuries caused by animals such as scratching or causing falls.

– There is no ‘one-bite rule’. The owner can’t argue for exemption claiming they had no knowledge of their pet’s violent tendencies previously.

– Your location during the unfavourable incident matters – ‘trespassing’ could potentially exempt owners from liability under some circumstances.

While encountering strains dealing with an unpleasant incident like a dog bite, one might get overwhelmed with new information and stagger essential conversations due its inherent legal complexities. Recognizing those signs becomes critical – reaching out for assistance in interpreting what occurred rather than making assumptions on your own.

Decoding details that matter includes understanding types of compensation victims might be eligible for:

• Medical Expenses: Doctors’ bills following treatment (emergency room visits, surgeries) including rehabilitative therapies.

• Lost Wages: Compensation upholds allowance if missed working days attributable to healing period cause financial stress.

• Pain and Suffering: Monetary sums to cover emotional distress experienced.

Nonetheless, remember that each situation is unique. We at Carlson Bier, with our proficient personal injury attorneys can help you dissect your own particular circumstances for optimal resolution.

Evidently, not all injuries appear immediately after the attack similarly not every story witnessed by a victim may be understood objectively alike – pinning down the integral elements might take some time. To confidently venture forth towards this process of investigation and negotiation having legal counsel from seasoned experts like us makes the ride smoother and beneficial in long haul.

One such requisite factor is ‘Statutes of Limitations’ under Illinois law – placing restrictions on how long one may wait before pursuing a dog bite case legally. The claim must be filed within 2 years following day of incident to stand valid. Our team’s quick action could save you valuable time in gathering evidence and building your case while working within these bound timelines.

Our pledge as trusted advocates for dog bite victims in Illinois is straightforward – guiding people like you step-by-step through their legal journey after unexpected incidents. Let us focus on law intricacies whilst you recover healthily. We ensure your rights are upheld diligently when dealing with insurance adjusters or opposing lawyers who seem to play hardball challenging your legitimate interests.

At Carlson Bier, we make it a point to represent personal injury clients empathetically yet efficiently offering free consultations aimed towards tailored services navigating individual needs effectively – no fees unless we win! So amidst doubt don’t hesitate but turn to reliable partners carving out effective strategies aligning best possible outcomes rightly owned by you.

Don’t let uncertainty bar your way anymore; because here at Carlson Bier, our fight against injustice doesn’t cease until justice prevails. Now that we’ve led you through these key insights into Dog Bite Injuries laws applicable within Illinois’s geography – why not harness assertive recourse? Remember you aren’t alone confronting this ordeal but have an accomplished acclaimed ally by your side. It’s time to click on the button below and get a free evaluation of what your case is worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Newman Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Newman

Areas of Practice in Newman

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing adept legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Offering dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering adept legal services to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Trip Accidents

Professional in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to supporting clients of car accidents gain just recompense for injuries and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Delivering specialist legal representation for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for losses.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Committed to offering specialized legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​