...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Nokomis

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the aftermath of a bicycle accident in Nokomis, reliable legal support is paramount. Experience and expertise matter most — that’s where Carlson Bier comes into play, renowned personal injury lawyers with an unmatched competency in handling bicycle accidents cases. Renowned for delivering justice and promoting clients’ rights, our esteemed team constantly strives to secure maximum compensation commensurate to physical injuries, emotional trauma or loss of income incurred through no fault of your own. Our proficient attorneys understand Illinois law inside out–equipping them with crucial insights on the unique complexities associated with bicycle accidents claims. Contrary to many counterparts who take a generalist approach, we demonstrate specialized knowledge exclusively dedicated towards resolving similar predicaments efficiently. At Carlson Bier we prioritize your long-term well-being while expediting mishap resolutions effectively given the sensitivity attached to it considering both legal and humanistic perspectives; simultaneously ensuring complete compliance within Illinois state stipulations about business conduct rules.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Nokomis Illinois

When it comes to bicycle accidents, Carlson Bier, one of the leading personal injury attorney groups in Illinois, provides comprehensive assistance and legal expertise. With bicycling gaining prominence as a preferred mode of transportation and for leisure activities, the risk of accidents has significantly increased. These incidents can lead to severe injuries or even worse repercussions demanding swift, efficient legal backup. Obtaining compensation for such situations should be entrusted upon a team that extensively understands the intricacies of these mishaps.

As part of our commitments at Carlson Bier, we ensure every case we handle is treated with utmost dedication and rigor. Our well-versed attorneys offer critical insights into different types of bicycle accident scenarios – right from hit-and-runs and speed-related collisions to hazardous road conditions causing unfortunate events.

In a series of key aspects that we focus on while processing your claim are:

• Determining liability: Identifying who is at fault in an accident can be complex. By gathering indispensable evidentiary materials such as traffic surveillance footage or eyewitness testimonies, we make certain no stone goes unturned.

• Assessing damages: Injuries resulted from bicycle accidents can cause long-term physical impairments or emotional distress. We dutifully account for all these factors when substantiating your claim ensuring you receive adequate compensation.

• Negotiating compensations: Our skilled lawyers will defend your rights effectively against insurance companies’ tactics aiming to undervalue your deserved reimbursements.

Understanding Bicycle laws in Illinois firmly holds equal importance along with knowing your rights as a victim in bike-related accidents. According to state laws:

• Bicyclists share the same rights (and responsibilities) as motor vehicle drivers;

• Cyclists must signal their intentions whenever turning or merging with vehicular traffic;

• The “3-feet law” requires passing vehicles maintain atleast a three feet clearance while overtaking bicyclists;

Failure in compliance by motorists may establish grounds for seeking justice in these accident-related cases.

Our firm, Carlson Bier, aims to provide nothing but the best legal support in your difficult times. We meticulously analyze every facet of your situation and safeguard your interests with lawyer-client confidentiality at all priorities.

We strongly believe that no individual should be left struggling due to someone else’s negligence on the roads. Just as you’re vigilant about your safety while cycling, we’re relentless in pursuing fair-redressal for any harm caused to you untimely.

Our success is a testament to our commitment- a proven track record testifying our pledge towards delivering justice comprehensively. With us by your side, rest assured; we will fight tirelessly until all options have been explored and max possible compensation has been secured. After all, it’s not just about claiming compensations but developing trustful relationships beyond professional commitments for us at Carlson Bier.

Interacting directly with insurance companies or legal authorities can prove very challenging without proper guidance and representation. Sometimes these scenarios might conclude unfavorable outcomes impacting future settlements underestimations or denied claims leave victims unequipped financially for their recovery phase. Here is where our team steps in; Offering committed representation ensuring maximum payouts in the shortest duration without worryingly confusing jargon or procedures interrupting your peace.

Are you eager to know what your case is worth? We strongly encourage you not to delay seeking expert opinion in such crucial matters affecting your well-being tremendously. Experience the Carlson Bier difference today by pressing the button below- initiate an obligation-free consultation offering detailed insights into potential compensation reflecting rightfully upon suffered damages’ significance accurately.

From then onwards, let us handle further complexities so you may return undistractedly towards healing back incessantly after unfortunate occurrences set you back temporarily away from reclaiming life’s complete liveliness again anxiously waited!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Nokomis Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Nokomis

Areas of Practice in Nokomis

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Supplying expert legal advice for patients of grave burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering skilled legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Slip Occurrences

Expert in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents gain fair remuneration for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Big Rig Mishap

Extending professional legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Head Impairments

Committed to ensuring specialized legal advice for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal support to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to defending patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​