...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Normal

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a pedestrian accident, securing professional legal help is crucial. Carlson Bier, esteemed personal injury lawyers in Illinois understand intricate laws governing pedestrian accidents. We take pride as leading negotiators and litigators dealing firmly with insurance companies striving to minimize or dismiss your rightful claim. Our astute understanding of how these cases unfold can turn the tables for victims residing in Normal – working diligently towards attaining maximum compensation possible.

Why consider us? Because Carlson Bier exemplifies trust, competence and extensive experience. Harnessing meticulous investigation skills coupled with powerful advocacy has resulted in millions retrieved on behalf of clients who’ve suffered due to negligent motorists.

Remember: time is paramount following an accident; swift action enables preservation of evidence vital to your case’s outcome. Rely on our proven track record – swift yet thorough analyses that deeply scrutinize all possible avenues for accountability – setting forth best strategy henceforth.

Accidents are not planned, but having proficient legal representation at hand should be! Touch base today for a complimentary consultation with experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier – where justice meets its match.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Normal Illinois

Pedestrian accidents often come with many unseen complications, including long-lasting injuries and complex legal battles. That’s why at Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we are adept at handling such cases efficiently and effectively. We take pride in acknowledging the immense responsibility we carry as your protection shield against the might it takes to confront negligent parties and their insurance companies.

Our extensive experience has awarded us a deep understanding of how pedestrian accident cases unfold. Often, liability is called into question when careless drivers dispute their blame within pedestrian collisions. However, our astute team of personal injury attorneys dives deeply into each case to meticulously scrutinize every possible angle. Some crucial elements they focus on while analyzing a case include:

– Determining if correct crosswalk procedures were being followed or not

– Assessing whether traffic rules were breached by examining intricate details

– Evaluating driver culpability by studying forms of distraction during the mishap

These factors can be pivotal for determining rightful compensation to cover medical expenses, loss wages due to time off work, pain and suffering or other undesired hardships suffered as consequences of a negligent party’s actions.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that knowledge empowers you to make informed decisions about your case. So let us break down some complexities associated with pedestrian accident laws to enhance your understanding:

1) Under The Right-of-Way Law: A motorist is obligated by Illinois’ safety laws to stop whenever pedestrians are crossing within any marked crosswalk.

2) Duty Of Care for Drivers: This aspect holds drivers responsible for operating their vehicles reasonably and safely so as not to harm other road users.

3) Comparative Negligence Act: Your claim may reduce if you are found partially responsible for the accident.

4) Statute Of Limitations: You have two years from the date of being injured in a pedestrian crash before submitting your claim lose this right indefinitely.

When faced with traumatic situations, it’s crucial to opt for protection that is knowledgeable and trustworthy. The Carlson Bier team works with unrivaled dedication in pursuing justice, ensuring victims of pedestrian accidents stand the best chance against those responsible.

The aftermath following a pedestrian accident can be daunting in nature; every term seems confusing, every law appears entangled. It is during these times one needs expert guidance to navigate through uncertainties leading towards comprehensive legal solutions. At Carlson Bier, we tirelessly strive to bring such complexities under comprehension and foster transparency throughout our clients’ journey with us. Every step we take is aimed at maximizing your recovery while relieving you from unnecessary stress.

Our commitment extends beyond mere representation within courtrooms; we are firm believers in maintaining open communication lines with our esteemed clients periodically. We regularly impart updates about case progressions, discuss possible resolutions, and always make informed decisions collectively as a team.

If you or your loved ones have been unfortunate victims of pedestrian mishaps caused due to another’s negligence, don’t let the momentary shock deter you from pursuing what rightfully belongs to you! With Carlson Bier fortifying your fight for justice with their aggressive representation fused with incomparable integrity – Rest assured that choosing us could be the game-changing decision elevating your pursuit towards success!

Ready for the next step? We invite you to explore what tangible difference qualified legal help can manifest into! For personalized consultation associated specifically with your situation dynamics, click on the button below. Don’t hold back; discover today how much value can be added by associating yourself with Illinois’ top personal injury attorneys and uncover an estimation regarding how much worth does your potential claim behold!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Normal Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Normal

Areas of Practice in Normal

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving specialist legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Clinical Negligence

Extending dedicated legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Slip Incidents

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Damages

Offering legal help for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents secure just recompense for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Delivering experienced legal services for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Head Traumas

Expert in providing professional legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in assisting clients with paralysis, offering professional legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​