...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Norris City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one have been the victim of dog bite injuries, it’s essential to secure skilled legal representation. Carlson Bier is your reliable choice in such trying times. As an established law firm with particular proficiency in personal injury cases, including those arising from dog bite incidents, our expertise stands unmatched. We understand the pain and trauma that come with these unfortunate incidents; hence we strive to achieve quick and favorable outcomes for our clients through detailed investigations and aggressive advocacy in Illinois state court systems. Our commitment lies at ensuring victims receive full compensation for medical bills, lost earnings, psychological distress among others damage often resulting from these tragic encounters with dogs. Moreover, if you’re seeking effective assertion of your rights under Illinois dog bite statutes against negligent pet owners or handlers residing within Norris City jurisdiction – remember their accountability is just as paramount as your healing process! Trust only Carlson Bier’s sound counsel coupled with relentless pursuit for justice – because YOU matter most.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Norris City Illinois

As established, competent and highly esteemed personal injury attorneys, we are Carlson Bier. Hailing from Illinois, we specialize in a wide range of personal injury claims including the all-too-common yet extremely significant area of dog-bite injuries. Our goal is to help our potential clients understand the gravity as well as the legal implications associated with these incidents.

Dog bite injuries can be more than just physically traumatic; they also come layered with emotional stress and complex legal ramifications. As per Illinois law, when you are bitten by someone else’s dog, it potentially qualifies as a personal injury case subject to stipulations within the Animal Control Act. Understanding these laws serves a vital role in evaluating whether one has a valid claim and what that could mean moving forward.

• The owner’s liability: Under Illinois law, any individual harboring or keeping an animal is legally considered its owner. This means if their dog bites someone unprovoked while it was off-leash or not confined properly, they can be held liable for damages incurred.

• Leash Law: A leash law requires owners to keep control over their pets – typically by using a leash – whenever they’re not at home on their property.

• Proving Negligence: It might be necessary in some cases to prove negligence on behalf of the animal keeper to succeed with your claim.

If proven successful, such claims have potential outcomes such as:

• Compensation for medical bills related to treatment and rehabilitation resulting from the attack

• Reimbursement for lost wages during recovery period

• Monetary relief for pain and suffering undergone due to physical scars or emotional trauma induced by attack

At Carlson Bier, we possess distinct expertise in navigating these often dense legal landscapes surrounding dog bite injuries so you don’t have to do it alone. Our proficient team undertakes comprehensive examinations into each case brought before us ensuring not only robust representation but also compassionately tailored solutions for our client’s needs.

While we value client education and awareness around dog bite injuries here at Carlson Bier, we also believe in the power of professional assistance. When faced with such a situation, it isn’t just about knowing the law but understanding how to make it work for you and that is where we come in. Personal injury cases like these can be daunting to face alone; from gathering evidence, proving negligence, negotiating settlements or if needed, representing you confidently in court- each step could significantly benefit from our expertise.

Our team is driven by the desire to secure justice for victims of dog bite injuries. We meticulously evaluate your case and devise strategies aiming for maximum damage recovery while compassionately supporting you through this trying period.

In depth knowledge about legalities involved, assertive negotiation skills coupled with steadfast dedication – all these factors play crucial roles in successfully closing personal injury claims especially those life changing situations involving dog bites; exactly what Carlson Bier has built its reputation upon over years of diligent service within Illinois.

As your potential advocates at Carlson Bier, security and relief is what we aim to provide you as we progress along on this journey together. Authentic concern coupled with proficient legal counsel -that’s the promise we bring to each client who walks through our doors seeking help after falling victim to distressing incidents involving dog attacks.

Understanding the visceral impact such incidents have on individuals physically, emotionally or financially – rasterizes our resolve ensuring fullest possible restitution through claim settlements favoring our clients’ . Your peace of mind isn’t just desired but demanded when working alongside us combating situations stemming from dog-bite injuries.

It’s important not only comprehend consequences related to these incidents but also understand process towards restitution which involves insights into applicability laws promising rightful compensation thereby offering chances at progressive recovery. That’s where distinguished attorneys like Carlson Bier progressively enter picture easing burdensome paths towards justice one well-negotiated settlement at a time!

Remember that allying yourself with seasoned professionals like Carlson Bier can prove to be the difference between an overwhelming ordeal and a manageable process. Leverage our knowledge, experience and dedication in navigating these tumultuous waters. For more information regarding how much your specific case could be worth, click on the button below for assistance from the reliable personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Norris City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Norris City

Areas of Practice in Norris City

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Offering professional legal assistance for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Offering specialist legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Tumble Mishaps

Professional in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Neonatal Damages

Delivering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Collisions

Collisions: Devoted to helping clients of car accidents get reasonable compensation for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Accident

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for hurts.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Damages

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal support for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to representing victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer