...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Norris

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be emotionally and physically devastating. At Carlson Bier, we believe in advocating for victims of such situations located in Norris. Our firm has built a reputation for aggressive representation and unwavering commitment to achieving justice for our clients inflicted with severe dog bites injuries. We meticulously investigate incidents to establish liability, ensuring you receive rightful compensation whether it’s related to loss of wages, medical expenses, or subjective factors like pain or trauma faced. As knowledgeable experts up-to-date with the diverse complexities of Illinois statutes on dog bites injuries law, we provide unparalleled legal counsel tailored specially towards your unique circumstances. Securing your future is essential; choosing Carlson Bier empowers you with the dedication of experienced lawyers working tirelessly behind-the-scenes armed by extensive trial experience and strategic judgement pivotal while fighting complicated battles against negligent parties causing the grievous harm! Reach out today – choose peace-of-mind knowing that Carlson Bier is standing firmly beside you as advocates against Dog Bite Injuries in this trying time.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Norris Illinois

The legal team at Carlson Bier takes personal injury cases seriously and we are here to provide you with comprehensive legal support in the aftermath of a dog bite injury. Based in Illinois, we understand the emotional distress and physical harm that such incidents can cause and are committed to helping you navigate through this challenging time.

Dog bite injuries can range from minor punctures and lacerations to serious wounds involving nerve damage or disfigurement. Moreover, these incidents can also lead to severe psychological trauma that is sometimes overlooked but no less significant than the physical injuries sustained. It’s important to know that under Illinois law, owners may be held legally responsible for their dogs’ aggressive behavior including bites regardless of past behavior or breed.

Proving liability in dog bite cases often requires a thorough understanding of various aspects including:

• Identifying who is legally responsible.

• Gaging if there was any provocation involved.

• Understanding and presenting medical reports detailing the severity of your injuries.

• Coordinating with insurance companies regarding claims and compensation guidelines.

Our experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier possess extensive knowledge in each of these areas ensuring you receive focused representation tailored for your specific situation. We don’t just stop there; our commitment to you extends beyond courtrooms as we work diligently towards connecting victims with appropriate medical treatments and rehabilitation services available within Illinois. For instance, did you know infection is one of the most common complications connected with dog bites? Rapid response could make all the difference when it comes to recovery speed.

While laws vary by state, Illinois follows strict liability where a pet owner will be held liable if their animal injures another person unless there was some form of provocation involved (in which case ensuing legal battles may become considerably more complex). From collecting evidence to managing paperwork, our competent attorneys adeptly tackle each aspect empowering our clients via efficacious advocacy against negligent parties.

We believe it’s not only about seeking compensation for medical expenses incurred but also transforming your situation towards recovery and normalcy. We strive hard to ensure victims are compensated for lost wages, pain & suffering, property damage, and other possible losses emerging from the incident.

We take immense pride in delivering personalized service consistently by understanding your circumstances thoroughly and providing clear action plans suited for you—this has become our hallmark at Carlson Bier. Our team is just a phone call away ready to advice you regarding potential claims following dog bite incidents.

Our ultimate aim is to keep your stress levels down while ensuring justice prevails in securing rightful compensation that matches up with the intensity of physical emotional trauma experienced during such unfortunate incidents.

As we traverse this journey together, we want to assure you that every step of the legal process will be carefully explained so that there’s absolute clarity about what’s happening now and what lies ahead. Transparency forms the crux of our practice because once you are armed with knowledge, you regain control over your life even in tumultuous times like these.

Finally, we know it might seem daunting but remember; recovering from a dog bite injury can be easier if equipped with proper legal assistance specializing in personal injury cases—and that’s exactly where Carlson Bier fits in! Don’t let uncertainty or insecurity hamper potential claims resulting out of a dog bite incident. Every case is unique seek help today for efficient navigation around Illinois laws surrounding dog bites. Keep scrolling below as success stories wait on the next page detailing various clients who have availed our services and emerged victorious.

So go ahead –click on that button below right now! Discover how much your case could potentially be worth whilst making informed decisions backed by our dedicated support as skilled practitioners within this realm!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Norris Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Norris

Areas of Practice in Norris

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Burn Traumas

Offering skilled legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing specialist legal support for victims affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, extending expert legal guidance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for hurts and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing professional legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to providing specialized legal advice for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and adept legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to supporting individuals with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​