...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Norris

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a potential medical malpractice case in Norris, identifying the right legal counsel is imperative. Let Carlson Bier be your personal and dedicated advocate. Our esteemed team of attorneys combines years of experience across multiple practice areas to provide exceptional representation, focusing particularly on medical malpractice cases. With unrivaled expertise right here in Illinois, we have an impressive track record of winning favorable settlements for our clientele who were wronged by negligent professionals in the healthcare industry. We continuously aim to shoulder a significant part of the burden associated with these challenging circumstances while passionately fighting for justice on your behalf. At Carlson Bier, it’s more than just legal support; it’s compassion and commitment tailored specifically towards aiding those affected by what could have been avoidable tragedies if due care was taken. In choosing us as your advocates against medical malpractice offenses – you’re choosing reliable partners committed to seeking success relentlessly no matter how complex or intricate one’s case may appear.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Norris Illinois

Carlson Bier Associates is a distinguished personal injury law firm in Illinois, steadfastly committed to representing victims of medical malpractice. This complex intersection of medicine and law requires robust expertise and an intimate understanding of both sectors; something that our seasoned attorneys possess in abundance. Medical malpractice refers to scenarios where a healthcare provider fails in providing the standard care required, resulting in harm or injury to the patient.

The most common types of medical malpractice include misdiagnosis or late diagnosis, inappropriate treatment or surgical errors, lack of informed consent from patients before conducting surgeries or other invasive procedures, ignoring patient’s history, displaying incompetence in interpreting test results leading to potential health risks.

In dealing with these manifold issues under Medical Malpractice law, Carlson Bier combines empathy with aggressive advocacy to ensure every client secures maximum rightful compensation: be it for physical suffering, emotional distress, additional medical expenses incurred due to negligence, loss of wages during recovery period or ongoing caretaking costs amidst other considerations.

Navigating through this complex system successfully requires legal representation that comprehends not only state laws but also recounts precedent cases. Our lawyers have extensive experience in investigating and identifying justifications that truly stand out for your respective case:

• A clear doctor-patient relationship was established.

• The doctor was negligent- fell short on providing proficient and reasonably skillful medical aid.

• Direct causality between the doctor’s negligence and injury suffered by the patient.

• Quantifiable physical damage resulted from this incidence: mental anguish isn’t sufficient ground; definitive harm such as pain, illness aggravation or increased likelihood of future health problems must be showcased.

Carlson Bier adopts a thorough approach towards all its cases. We diligently collect evidence such as medical reports and expert testimonies while working closely with credited professionals who can attest how standards were violated. Furthermore, we assist clients adapt suitable strategies based upon respective statutes allotted under Illinois’ law e.g., timeperiods for filing medical malpractice lawsuits.

Every victim of medical malfeasance deserves nothing less than exemplary legal insight and support. And this is precisely what we, at Carlson Bier, bring to the forefront using our years of experience in safeguarding victims’ rights and ensuring they retain their fair share in such unfortunate circumstances.

Yet, every case pertaining to medical anomalies isn’t inherently tantamount to malpractice—hence, timely legal consultation becomes extraordinarily essential. Despite the intricacies involved with these cases, we believe comprehensive education about the subject will help potential victims identify their situations better. Hence, we consistently strive towards enriching respective information through our website and personal discussions alike.

As your trusted associate during these challenging times, Carlson Bier highlights its resolute commitment towards bringing justice to your doorstep. While every instance of harm doesn’t qualify for a lawsuit necessarily, it’s crucially necessary to grasp rightful evaluation based on distinct details and respective context under expert supervision; allowing you an understanding if you have valid grounds for filing a judicial claim.

So why wait? It’s time now for action! Entrust us with your situation and let us be the sturdy beacon illuminating the path towards your deserving justice. Click on the button below now! Let us help evaluate how much compensation rightfully belongs to you– not just monetarily but also facilitating restitution for peace-of-mind that was brazenly taken away from you by careless execution within established healthcare protocols. Regardless of how complex or straightforward these scenarios might appear initially; precise context-based assessment remains imperative- something which requires seasoned expertise like ours at Carlson Bier Associates.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Norris Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Norris

Areas of Practice in Norris

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing skilled legal services for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Providing experienced legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Aged Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Slip Occurrences

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Accidents

Collisions: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents get fair settlement for harms and damages.

Motorbike Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring professional legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Expert in extending specialized legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Committed to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Fatality

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Trauma

Committed to advocating for clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer